Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/722,273

METHODS AND DEVICES FOR DETERMINING BONE CHARACTERISTICS AND BONE PREPARATION PLANS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 20, 2024
Priority
Jan 07, 2022 — provisional 63/297,402 +1 more
Examiner
GIBSON, ERIC SHANE
Art Unit
3775
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Smith & Nephew Asia Pacific Pte. Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
748 granted / 874 resolved
+15.6% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
896
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.0%
+3.0% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 874 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of group I, claims 1, 2 and 5-14 in the reply filed on 13 March 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 16, 17 and 20-29 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 13 March 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2 and 5-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Forstein, U.S. PG-Pub 2020/0030036. Regarding claim 1, Forstein discloses a computer-assisted surgical system comprising: a bone preparation tool (30); and at least one computing device (104) in communication with the bone preparation tool (Fig. 5), the at least one computing device comprising: processing circuitry; and a memory coupled to the processing circuitry (paragraph [0042]), the memory comprising instruction that, when executed by the processing circuitry, cause the processing circuitry to receive operating information of the bone preparation tool (spindle speed, force, friction and temperature) with a portion of the patient bone (paragraph [0031]), and determine bone characteristic information (bone quality data and density) of the portion of the patient bone based on the operating information (paragraph [0034]); wherein the bone characteristic information comprises bone hardness (paragraph [0038]). Regarding claims 2 and 5, Forstein discloses wherein the bone preparation tool (30) comprises a cutting tool (32) (Fig. 5 and paragraph [0040]); and wherein the operating information comprises resistance (via force sensing) and rotation speed (spindle speed) (paragraph [0031]). Regarding claims 6-8, Forstein discloses the memory comprising instructions that, when executed by the processing circuitry, cause the processing circuitry to: access an interference-fit (press-fit due to undersized cavity) for a cementless implant component for the portion of the patient bone, and determine at least one implant component property of the cementless implant based on the bone characteristic information and the interference-fit value; the at least one implant component property comprising a size of the cementless implant (implant being larger than the cavity); and the at least one implant component property comprising a shape of the implant (paragraphs [0005], [0027], [0033]). Regarding claims 9-11, Forstein discloses the memory comprising instructions that, when executed by the processing circuitry, cause the processing circuitry to: access an interference-fit value for a cementless implant component for the portion of the patient bone, and generate an offset value based on the bone characteristic information, the offset value comprising an adjustment of the interference-fit value (via cavity size adjustment) (paragraph [0033]); wherein the bone characteristic information comprises a hardness value for each of a plurality of different regions of the portion of the patient bone; and the memory comprising instructions that, when executed by the processing circuitry, cause the processing circuitry to generate an interference-fit value map to visually represent interference-fit values and corresponding offsets for the plurality of different regions of the portion of the patient bone (paragraphs [0033] and [0042]). Regarding claims 12-14, Forstein discloses the memory comprising instructions that, when executed by the processing circuitry, cause the processing circuitry to generate a bone preparation plane for a cementless implant component base, at least in part, on the bone characteristic information (paragraph [0005]), to generate the bone preparation plane via updating an existing bone preparation plane (intra-operative changes) based on the bone characteristic information (paragraphs [0042] and [0045]), and to update the existing bone preparation plan with a modified interference-fit value (via cavity adjustments) (paragraph [0033]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Eric Gibson whose telephone number is (571)270-5274. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday ~6:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. (CST). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, Kevin Truong, at (571) 272-4705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ERIC S GIBSON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3775
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636017
IMPROVED SURGICAL OSCILLATING SAW BLADES
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636018
DRILLING DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS
1y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629154
MULTI HELICAL BROACHING PUNCH FOR OSTEOTOMY CREATION
3y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629263
EXPANDABLE FUSIONS DEVICES, INSTRUMENTS, AND METHODS THEREOF
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622789
Bladed Spinal Fusion Implants
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.8%)
2y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 874 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month