Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/722,805

SLIDING CONTACT MATERIAL FOR MOTOR BRUSH, MOTOR BRUSH, AND DIRECT CURRENT MOTOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 27, 2024
Priority
Dec 24, 2021 — JP 2021-211066 +1 more
Examiner
VAZIRI, MASOUD
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.k.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
124 granted / 168 resolved
+13.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
176
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 168 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-5 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakamura et al. (US 20100308688 A1). Regarding claim 1, Nakamura discloses a sliding contact material for a motor brush (para [0001]: “The present invention relates to a sliding contact material suitable for a motor commutator performing electrical opening and closing by means of mechanical sliding operation. More particularly, it relates to a sliding contact material suitable for a high-capacity small electric DC motor whose initial starting current is 1 ampere or higher, which is used for an electrically-driven retractable mirror and the like of an automobile.”), the sliding contact material comprising: ZnO particles (para [0015]: “The sliding contact material of the present invention may be a material in which an oxide of one kind or two or more kinds of Mg, Fe, Co, Ni and Zn is further dispersed.”) and Ta205 particles dispersed in the matrix, wherein the sliding contact material has a ZnO particle content of 0.1% by mass or more and 12% by mass or less and a Ta2O5 particle content of 0.1% by mass or more and 6.0% by mass or less (para [0012]: “the present invention provides a sliding contact material in which metal oxide particles are dispersed in an Ag alloy matrix, wherein the Ag alloy matrix is an Ag alloy containing 0.01 to 10.0 wt % of at least one kind of Fe, Co, Ni and Cu in Ag, and as the metal oxide, 0.1 to 3.0 wt % of a Ta oxide is dispersed.”, and [0015]: “The content of oxide of one kind or two or more kinds of Mg, Fe, Co, Ni and Zn is made 0.1 to 10.0 wt %.” and “Among the oxides of Mg, Fe, Co, Ni and Zn, at least one kind of Mg oxide and Zn oxide is preferably dispersed.”). Nakamura does not disclose the Ag is pure. However, to optimize the design, controlling the impurity level or the composition of the Ag as a matrix is within the skills of those having ordinary skills in the art. To optimize the design of the sliding contact material, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use pure Ag as a matrix. Regarding claim 2, Nakamura as modified in claim 1 discloses the sliding contact material for a motor brush according to claim 1, wherein the pure Ag as a matrix is pure Ag having an Fe/Cr/Ni total content of 0.3% by mass or less (see [0012] and [0015]: “The content of oxide of one kind or two or more kinds of Mg, Fe, Co, Ni and Zn is made 0.1 to 10.0 wt %.”) . Regarding claim 3, Nakamura discloses a composite material for a motor brush (para [0013]), the composite material comprising: a base material comprising a Cu-based material; and a sliding contact material jointed to at least a part of the base material, wherein the sliding contact material jointed is the sliding contact material defined in claim 1 or 2 (see para [0016]: “In the case where the above-described sliding contact material of the present invention is used as the motor commutator, to make the construction material of commutator more suitable, the sliding contact material is preferably used as a clad composite material in which a base material consisting of Cu or Cu alloy is used, and the sliding contact material of the present invention is embedded in a part of the base material.”). Regarding claim 4, Nakamura discloses a motor brush for a DC motor (para [0001]), the motor brush comprising the composite material defined in claim 3 (see para [0016]). Regarding claim 5, Nakamura discloses a DC motor comprising: a motor brush; and a commutator ([0004]), wherein the motor brush is the motor brush defined in claim 4 (see para [0016]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MASOUD VAZIRI whose telephone number is (571)272-2340. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm EST.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, the examiner’s supervisor, SEYE IWARERE can be reached on (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MASOUD VAZIRI/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749941
BRUSHLESS MOTOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749936
ROTOR ARRANGEMENT FOR IMPROVED COOLING OF A ROTOR
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738799
MOTOR RADIATOR
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738812
DISCHARGE DEVICE FOR DISCHARGING ELECTRICAL CURRENTS AND MACHINE COMPRISING SUCH A DISCHARGE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726057
FAN MOTOR AND HAIR DRYER COMPRISING SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+8.0%)
2y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 168 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month