Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/722,932

IMAGE IRRADIATION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 06, 2024
Priority
Dec 24, 2021 — JP 2021-210469 +1 more
Examiner
HASAN, MOHAMMED A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1607 granted / 1779 resolved
+30.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +5% lift
Without
With
+5.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1796
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
64.8%
+24.8% vs TC avg
§102
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1779 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Priority 1. Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a) — (d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Oath/Declaration Oath/Declaration 2. Oath and declaration filed on is accepted. Information Disclosure Statement 3. The prior art documents submitted by application in the Information Disclosure Statement filed on 6/21/2024 have all been considered and made of record ( note the attached copy of form PTO – 1449). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 4. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Morohashi et al (2021/0011286 A1) in view of Ozawa (2023/0362495 A1). Regarding claim 1, Morohashi et al discloses (refer to figures 1 and 2) an image irradiation device (1,10) for a vehicle configured to be able to display a plurality of virtual (M1,M2) at different distances (paragraph 0016 and paragraph 0019), the image irradiation device (1,10) comprising: an image generation unit (20) configured to generate a first image for forming a first virtual image (M1) and a second image for forming a second virtual image (M2) to be displayed nearer than the first virtual image. Morohashi et al discloses all of the claimed limitations except an optical member configured to be able to reduce an amount of external light incident on the image generation unit and to be movable between a position through which first light constituting the first image emitted from the image generation unit passes and a position through which the first light does not pass. Ozawa discloses an optical member configured to be able to reduce an amount of external light incident on the image generation unit and to be movable between a position through which first light constituting the first image emitted from the image generation unit passes and a position through which the first light does not pass (i.e., image irradiator device [paragraph 0001] and external light outside of the vehicle [ paragraph 0104] and external light can be reduces [paragraph 0015]. It would have been obvious teaching of Ozawa an optical member configured to be able to reduce an amount of external light incident on the image generation unit and to be movable between a position through which first light constituting the first image emitted from the image generation unit passes and a position through which the first light does not pass in to the Morohashi et al an image irradiation device improve the visibility as taught by Ozawa (paragraph 0037). PNG media_image1.png 560 439 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, combination of Morohashi et al in view of Ozawa discloses wherein the position through which the first light does not pass is between a position through which the first light constituting the first image emitted from the image generation unit passes and a position through which second light constituting the second image emitted from the image generation unit passes (Ozawa , figure 3 first image X1 and second image X2 [paragraph 0068] and image generation unit 424 [paragraph 0064]. Regarding claim 3, Morohashi et al discloses, further comprising: a reflection unit (2) figure 1 ) configured to reflect the first light constituting the first image and the second light constituting the second image emitted from the image generation unit, wherein the optical member is provided between the image generation unit and the reflection unit (2). Regarding claim 4, Morohashi et al discloses, wherein the optical member is attached to the image generation unit (20) (as shown in figure 1). Regarding claim 5, combination of Morohashi et al in view of Ozawa discloses further comprising: a controller (2) (Ozawa et al ) configured to control the optical member, wherein the controller (2) is configured to control the optical member so that the optical member is arranged at a position through which the first light does not pass when the first light is emitted from the image generation unit, and is arranged at a position through which the first light passes when the first light is not emitted from the image generation unit. Regarding claim 6, combination of Morohashi et al in view of Ozawa discloses further comprising: a controller (2) (Ozawa et al ) configured to control the optical member, wherein the controller is configured to control the optical member to be arranged at a position through which the first light passes when a temperature of the image generation unit becomes a predetermined value or greater(i.e., image irradiator device [paragraph 0001] and external light outside of the vehicle [ paragraph 0104] and external light can be reduces [paragraph 0015]. Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claim 7 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 6. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: further comprising: a controller configured to control the optical member, wherein the controller is configured to control the optical member so that the optical member is arranged at a position through which the first light does not pass when the first light is emitted from the image generation unit, and is arranged at a position through which the first light passes when the first light is not emitted from the image generation unit, and wherein the controller is configured to control the optical member to be arranged at a position through which the first light passes when a temperature of the image generation unit becomes a predetermined value or greater while the first light is emitted. Conclusion 7.Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMED A HASAN whose telephone number is (571)272-2331. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 6 AM -4 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bumsuk Won can be reached at 571-272-2713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMED A HASAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872 6/17/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678042
OPHTHALMOLOGIC APPARATUS AND METHOD OF EXAMINING EYE TO BE EXAMINED
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681362
IMAGING APPARATUS, CAMERA MODULE, AND CONTROL METHOD FOR IMAGING APPARATUS
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672775
ACCOMMODATION TRACKING BASED ON RETINAL-IMAGING
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674962
OPTICAL LENS ASSEMBLY AND PHOTOGRAPHING MODULE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667256
EYE EXAMINATION APPARATUS FOR USE WITH A SMARTPHONE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+5.1%)
1y 10m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1779 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month