Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/723,137

A SYSTEM TO TREAT HEART FAILURE WITH PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION (HFpEF)

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 21, 2024
Examiner
LAU, MICHAEL J
Art Unit
3796
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Royal College Of Surgeons In Ireland
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
207 granted / 292 resolved
+0.9% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
337
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.9%
+11.9% vs TC avg
§102
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§112
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 292 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-3, 5, 11, 23-25, 28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fukamachi (WO 2020/081481 A1) in view of Mohl (US 2016/0000983 A1). Regarding claim 1, Fukamachi discloses a system to treat heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), the system comprising: a blood pumping device configured for implantation in a left ventricle of a heart of a subject (Eg. Para. 2-9, 75), in which the blood pumping device is configured to draw blood from a left atrium into the left ventricle of the heart through a mitral valve upon activation (eg. Para. 62); an anchoring assembly (eg. Para. 66) and a controller configured to modify the output parameters of the blood pumping device so as to activate and deactivate the blood pumping device in a pattern synergistic with a cardiac cycle of the subject comprising activation during ventricular diastole and deactivation during ventricular systole (eg. Para. 79-83, claim 3) but does not specifically disclose for anchoring the blood pumping device to a wall of the left ventricle. Mohl teaches a ventricular assist device using an anchor on the left ventricle (eg. Abstract, Para. 5, 13, 30, 76, Fig. 2a-b) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the invention of Fukamachi with the anchoring on the left ventricle as taught by Mohl since assist devices are typically implanted in the left ventricle (eg. Mohl, Para. 5). Regarding claim 2, the combined invention of Fukamachi and Mohl discloses at least one sensor in communication with the controller to detect one or more parameters associated with the heart, wherein the controller is configured to modify the output parameters of the blood pumping device based on the one or more detected parameters received from the at least one sensor (eg. Fukamachi, Para. 14, 26-27, 32-41, 68, 78, 81). Regarding claim 3, the combined invention of Fukamachi and Mohl discloses further comprising at least one sensor (in communication with the controller to detect one or more parameters associated with the heart, wherein the controller is configured to modify the output parameters of the blood pumping device based on the one or more detected parameters received from the at least one sensor (eg. Fukamachi, Para. 14, 26-27, 32-41, 68, 78, 81); and in which the at least one sensor is configured to detect one or more parameters selected from heart rate, closure of the aortic valve, opening of the aortic valve, closure of the mitral valve, and-or opening of the mitral valve; and the controller is configured to adjust the frequency of activation and deactivation of the blood pumping device based on the one or more parameters sensed by the sensor (eg. Fukamachi, Para. 14, 26-27, 32-41, 68, 78, 81); and in which controller is optionally configured to adjust the frequency of activation and deactivation of the blood pumping device by modulating the frequency of the voltage supply to the blood pumping device (Eg. Fukamatsu, Para. 14, 18, 26-27, 32-42 synchronizing with the heart beats and alternatively turn on and off). Regarding claim 5, the combined invention of Fukamachi and Mohl discloses comprising at least one sensor in communication with the controller to detect one or more parameters associated with the heart, wherein the controller is configured to modify the output parameters of the blood pumping device based on the one or more detected parameters received from the at least one sensor (eg. Fukamachi, Para. 14, 26-27, 32-41, 68, 78, 81); and in which the at least one sensor is configured to detect a blood pressure parameter of the subject's heart and the controller is configured to adjust the pump flow rate of the blood pumping device to correspond to the blood pressure parameter sensed by the sensor (eg. Fukamachi, Para. 14, 26-27, 32-41, 68, 78, 81), in which controller is optionally configured to adjust the pump flow rate of the blood pumping device by modulating the amplitude of the voltage supply to the blood pumping device (Eg. Fukamatsu, Para. 14, 18, 26-27, 32-42 synchronizing with the heart beats and alternatively turn on and off). Regarding claim 11, the combined invention of Fukamachi and Mohl discloses the blood pumping device comprises: a first cylindrical part (eg. Fig. 1-9, housing 20 comprising a motor (eg. Fig. 1-9 stator and rotor 40 and 60); a second cylindrical part comprising an impeller (eg. Fig. 1-9, 62 and pumping chamber 22), a central part connecting the first cylindrical part and second cylindrical part comprising the fluid inlet (Eg. Fig. 1-9, inlet 102); and a fluid outlet disposed in the first cylindrical part or second cylindrical part (eg. Fig. 1-9, outlet 104), wherein the rotor extends from the motor to the impeller through the central part (Eg. Fig. 1-9 central area of housing 20). Regarding claim 23, the combined invention of Fukamachi and Mohl discloses an access sheath having a lumen configured for percutaneous delivery of the blood pumping device to the left ventricle (eg. Mohl, Para. 29, 42, 60, 78, 81, claim 10). Regarding claim 24, the combined invention of Fukamachi and Mohl discloses an access sheath having a lumen configured for percutaneous delivery of the blood pumping device to the left ventricle and comprising a delivery shaft for the blood pumping device to advance the blood pumping device through the lumen of the access sheath (eg. Mohl, Para. 29, 42, 60, 78, 81, claim 10). Regarding claim 25, the combined invention of Fukamachi and Mohl discloses an access sheath having a lumen configured for percutaneous delivery of the blood pumping device to the left ventricle and a delivery shaft for the blood pumping device to advance the blood pumping device through the lumen of the access sheath; and in which the delivery shaft and blood pumping device are configured for detachable coupling together (eg. Mohl, Para. 29, 42, 60, 78, 81, claim 10, detachable obvious in view of MPEP 2144.04). Regarding claim 28, the combined invention of Fukamachi and Mohl discloses the anchoring assembly is configured to couple to the blood pumping device in-vivo (eg. Mohl, Para. 1, 5, 13, 30, 76, claim 1). Claim(s) 8-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fukamachi (WO 2020/081481 A1) in view of Mohl (US 2016/0000983 A1), further in view of Schmulewitz (US 2001/0027287 A1). Regarding claims 8-9, the combined invention of Fukamachi and Mohl discloses the invention of claim 1, but does not disclose blood pumping device comprises a fluidic extension conduit configured to provide fluidic communication from inside the left atrium to the blood inlet of the housing. Schmulewitz discloses a blood pumping device with a flexible conduit providing fluidic communication from the left atrium to a left ventricle (eg. Para. 41-51, Fig. 1, 6, 11). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have combined the invention to have a flexible conduit from the left atrium as taught by Schmulewitz since it is common in the art for delivering oxygenated blood and add other therapeutic agents (eg. Schmulewitz Para. 21-23). While the conduit doesn’t connect to a housing inlet, one of ordinary skill would have connected a detachable conduit to the pump system for delivery of blood and/or therapeutic agents since conduits are commonly used in the art. Making a conduit detachable is obvious in view of MPEP 2144.04. Regarding claim 10, the combined invention of Fukamachi, Mohl, and Schmulewitz discloses the fluidic extension conduit is flexible (eg. Schmulewitz, Para. 46). Claim(s) 26 and 29 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fukamachi (WO 2020/081481 A1) in view of Mohl (US 2016/0000983 A1), further in view of Quadri (US 2015/0032153 A1). Regarding claim 26, the combined invention of Fukamachi and Mohl discloses the invention of claim 1, but does not disclose the anchoring assembly comprises a plurality of anchoring arms configured for adjustment from a stowed position suitable for percutaneous delivery to a deployed position in which the plurality of anchoring arms oppose the ventricular wall. Quadri teaches an anchoring assembly for an anatomical wall with retractable features (Fig. 5-7, 14-15, Para. 51, 123-125, 132). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have combined the invention of Fukamachi and Mohl with the anchoring mechanism as taught by Quadri to provide the predictable result of a retractable function to the implant. Regarding claim 29, the combined invention of Fukamachi, Mohl, and Quadri discloses the anchoring assembly is configured to couple to the blood pumping device in-vivo (eg. Mohl, Para. 1, 5, 13, 30, 76, claim 1); and in which the anchoring assembly comprises an anchoring hub configured for coupling to the blood pumping device and a plurality of anchoring arms extending from the hub (eg. Quadri, Fig. 5-7, 14-15, Para. 51, 123-125, 132). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL J LAU whose telephone number is (571)272-2317. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Carl Layno can be reached at 571-272-4949. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL J LAU/Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 21, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599762
LEAD ANCHOR FOR A NEUROMODULATION LEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588824
CARDIAC PULSE WAVE RETRIEVAL FROM AN ELECTRICAL SIGNAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588849
GARMENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582343
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR WAVELENGTH MAPPING CARDIAC FIBRILLATION AND OPTIMIZING ABLATION LESION PLACEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564443
Tailored Laser Pulses for Surgical Applications
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+25.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 292 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month