Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/723,783

SYSTEM OF A TOY ASSEMBLY LINE FOR A TOY, TOY ASSEMBLY LINE AND TOY

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 24, 2024
Examiner
FERNSTROM, KURT
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Min Toy Private Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
1048 granted / 1589 resolved
-4.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1632
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§103
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1589 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings New corrected drawings in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in this application because the drawings of record do not have the requisite line quality. Under 37 CFR 1.84(a)(1), black and white drawings incorporating solid black lines are required. Additionally, the reference numbers in Figs. 2 and 3 are so small as to be illegible. The drawings are further objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they include the following reference characters not mentioned in the description: 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 (all of which are in Fig. 4). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d), or amendment to the specification to add the reference character(s) in the description in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(b) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. Applicant is advised to employ the services of a competent patent draftsperson outside the Office, as the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office no longer prepares new drawings. The corrected drawings are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. The requirement for corrected drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 8-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claims 8-12 recite “[a]n assembly line box” in their preambles. These claims are not in proper dependent form, because they fail to include all of the limitations of claim 1 (from which they depend). Amendment of the claims to recite “The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the assembly line box comprises…” in their preambles is suggested as one way to overcome the rejections. Claims 13-15 recite a toy of the system in their preambles, and rejected for similar reason. Amendment of these claims to recite “The system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the toy comprises…” would overcome the rejections to these claims. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7 are allowed. Claims 8-15 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art fails to disclose or suggest a device having each of the recited limitations. While various toy assembly devices are known, including devices comprising systems for assembling toy vehicles and toy assembly lines, the specific configuration of structural elements as recited in claim 1 is not disclosed in the prior art, nor is there any motivation or suggestion to modify the teachings of the prior art to create the claimed invention without using impermissible hindsight. As a result, claim 1 and its dependent claims 2-15 contain allowable subject matter. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KURT FERNSTROM whose telephone number is (571)272-4422. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Vasat can be reached at 571-270-7625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KURT FERNSTROM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715 February 26, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 24, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588778
UPLIFTED HANDS ASSIST DEVICE FOR PRAYING LIKE MOSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12567342
Fluid Simulation Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562078
VEIN SIMULATOR SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12555493
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MANIPULATIVES FOR INSTRUCTION IN EXPONENTS AND LOGARITHMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12555494
VASCULAR ACCESS TRAINING SIMULATOR SYSTEM AND TRANSPARENT ANATOMICAL MODEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1589 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month