Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/723,959

RESIN COMPOSITION, OPTICAL FIBER, OPTICAL FIBER MANUFACTURING METHOD, OPTICAL FIBER RIBBON, AND OPTICAL FIBER CABLE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 25, 2024
Priority
Jun 01, 2023 — JP 2023-090943 +1 more
Examiner
MCCLENDON, SANZA L
Art Unit
1765
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
1007 granted / 1252 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1289
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
§112
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1252 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102/Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 4, and 7-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Tortorello et al (6,638,616), as evidenced by Samim Blog post (1/2024). Tortorello sets forth radiation curable solvent-free coating compositions for optical fibers. Said compositions comprise a urethane (meth) acrylate oligomer having an alkyd backbone; a reactive diluent; a photoinitiator; and, optionally, an additive—see abstract and col. 2, lines 30-37. Said resin compositions are used optical fiber coatings, such as outer primary coating compositions; ink compositions, matrix compositions, and bundling materials—see col. 9, lines 55-59. Tortorello explicitly sets forth a resin composition for a primary optical fiber coating comprising 20.63 wt. % of oligomer UA-1; 4.86 wt. % of isobornyl acrylate; 1.50 wt. % ethoxylated bisphenol diacrylate; 3.0 wt. % of hexanediol diacrylate; and 0.90 wt. % of a photoinitiator; wherein UA-1 is a urethane (meth) acrylate comprise an alkyd polyester comprising coconut oil (plant based)—see example 1, Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3. Said composition does not comprise a silane coupling agent; however, Tortorello sets forth when used as an inner primary coating or a coating intended to be coated onto a fresh fiber, a silane coupling agent should be added—see col. 9, lines 33-45 and col. 10, lines 7-11. Therefore, it is deemed the addition of a silane coupling agent is set forth with sufficient specificity in absence of evidence to the contrary and/or unexpected results. In the alternative, it would have been within the skill level of an ordinary artisan to add a silane coupling agent to the composition with a reasonable expectation of promoting adhesion to said glass fiber in absence of evidence to the contrary and/or unexpected results. Regarding claim 2 and claim7: The urethane acrylate (UV-1) is obtained from the reaction of 45.88 parts of alkyd I (based on coconut oil (plant based)); 22.37 parts isophorone diisocyanate; and 11.65 parts hydroxyethyl acrylate, wherein this composition, i.e., the urethane (meth) acrylate, comprises 57.4 % of the alkyd resin. Regarding claim 4, the composition set forth in example 1 comprises 66.7 wt. % of the urethane (meth) acrylate oligomer. In the overall teachings of said reference it is set forth the oligomer (A) is added in amounts from 10 wt. % to 90 wt. %--see col 6, lines 39-44. The courts have upheld “where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation. In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 124 (CCPA 1955). Regarding the optical fiber in claims 8-9: Tortorello does not expressly set forth the structure of an optical fiber as set forth in instant claim 8-9; however, Tortorello sets forth said resin compositions can be incorporated into inner primary coating compositions, outer primary coating compositions, ink compositions, matrix forming compositions, and bundling materials, which can be colored or non-colored, wherein it is preferred to use alkyd-based urethane acrylate oligomers in harder coatings such as outer primary coatings, ink compositions, matrix and bundling materials—see col. 9, lines 50-59. Additionally, it is known that optical fibers set inherently comprises as required parts a core (glass fiber); a cladding layer; a primary coating and a secondary coating-- PNG media_image1.png 330 623 media_image1.png Greyscale , as evidenced by Samin blog (1/2024). Therefore, it would have been within the skill level of an ordinary artisan to obtain from the overall teachings of the reference an optical fiber comprising a core; a cladding, a primary resin layer in contact with said fiber; and a secondary resin layer coating said primary resin layer, wherein the primary resin layer contains the resin compositions set forth by Tortorello and exmplified the example with a reasonable expectation obtaining a resin layer having improved break-out characteritics, as suggested by Tortorello in absence of evidence to the contary and/or unexpected results—see col. 9, lines 60-65. Thus, claim 8 is found in the reference with sufficient specificity. Regarding claim 9: It is set forth the compositions are coated onto fibers [col. 10, lines 5-12] and the compositions are curable by exposure to UV radiation [col. 3, line 3; col. 10, lines 45-51 and examples]. It is deemed curing by exposure to UV radiation after coating is sufficiently set forth in the overall teachings of the reference. Regarding claims 10-12: Tortorello sets forth said resin compositions can be incorporated into inner primary coating compositions, outer primary coating compositions, ink compositions, matrix forming compositions, and bundling materials, which can be colored or non-colored, wherein it is preferred to use alkyd-based urethane acrylate oligomers in harder coatings such as outer primary coatings, ink compositions, matrix and bundling materials. Thus, claims 10-12 are found in the overall teachings of the reference with sufficient specficity for a skilled artisan to obtain optical fiber ribbons and optical fiber cables comprising at least one hard primary layer comprising said compositions in absence of evidence to the contrary and/or unexpected results. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 or 5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SANZA L MCCLENDON whose telephone number is (571)272-1074. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Heidi Riviere-Kelley can be reached at 571-270-1831. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SANZA L. McCLENDON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1765 SMc
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 25, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767866
UV CURABLE ADHESIVE COMPOSITION AND ADHESIVE FILM, ADHESIVE TAPE, AND BONDING COMPONENT COMPRISING THEREOF
4y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760192
3D PRINTING COMPOSITION WITH LIGHT SCATTERING NANOPARTICLES TO ASSIST CURING
3y 12m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760137
PHOTOSENSITIVE RESIN COMPOSITION, CURED PRODUCT THEREOF AND MULTILAYER MATERIAL
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760199
DAYLIGHT CURING CONCRETE PRIMER COMPOSITION
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12760265
DYNAMIC HYDROGEL AND PULMONARY FIBROSIS BIONIC CHIP
2y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 9m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1252 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month