Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/724,417

Method for regulating a heating unit in a facility for producing containers

Non-Final OA §101§102§Other
Filed
Jun 26, 2024
Examiner
HUSON, MONICA ANNE
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sidel Participations
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
1073 granted / 1352 resolved
+14.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1395
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
44.8%
+4.8% vs TC avg
§102
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1352 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 18 is objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claim 1. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 9 and 11-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because the claim’s computer program product would be considered a transitory signal which does not fall into a statutory category. See MPEP 2160.03 (I-II). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 9-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Linke et al. (U.S. Patent 7,887,742). Regarding Claims 9 and 11-17, Linke et al., hereafter “Linke,”, shows a computer program product (Column 3, lines 19-28, 46-55; Column 7, lines 7-40: instructions for the automatic control and how it takes into consideration behavior of the system are held to meet a computer program product). Regarding Claim 10, Link shows that it is known to have a data processing device (Column 7, lines 7-40: automatic control system). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The prior art of record does not clearly show or suggest the claimed method for producing containers made of thermoplastic material from preforms, especially including the step of modifying electrical power of at least two rows of radiation sources while keeping the sum of electrical power of at least two rows of radiation sources the same. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONICA HUSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1198. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8a-4p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MONICA ANNE HUSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 1742 /MONICA A HUSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600076
METHOD FOR OPERATING A CONTAINER TREATMENT SYSTEM AND CONTAINER TREATMENT SYSTEM WITH OPTIMIZED PARAMETERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594630
AMORPHOUS PHASE MODIFICATION APPARATUS AND PROCESSING METHOD OF SINGLE CRYSTAL MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589543
METHOD FOR PRODUCING A CONTAINER PRODUCT AND DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589525
IN-SITU COMPACTION DURING Z-FIBER REINFORCEMENT OF DRY FIBER PREFORMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591083
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DIFFRACTION GRATING AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING REPLICA GRATING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.6%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1352 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month