Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/724,561

INK SET

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 26, 2024
Priority
Jan 31, 2022 — JP 2022-013169 +1 more
Examiner
BLEDSOE, JOSHUA CALEB
Art Unit
1762
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sakata INX Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allowance Rate
47 granted / 107 resolved
-21.1% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+45.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
197
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
58.9%
+18.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 107 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Konishi (WO 2021/192452 A1, hereinafter referring to the attached ESPACENET translation). Regarding claim 1, Konishi teaches an ink set comprising a printing treatment solution and an aqueous inkjet ink composition ([0010]), wherein the printing treatment solution contains an organic acid having a boiling point of 120°C or less at 1 atm ([0008]). The ink composition contains the following: A pigment ([0023]), wherein the pigment may be a white pigment ([0030]) An alkali-soluble resin ([0023]), which is specifically indicated as containing anionic groups such as carboxy groups ([0031]) and hydrophobic groups ([0032]), and wherein monomers containing these groups are specifically and separately listed (e.g., [0042] and [0044]). The alkali-soluble resin is indicated as having an acid value ranging from 140 – 300 mgKOH/g ([0033]), which overlaps the claimed range of “200 mgKOH/g or higher,” establishing a prima facie case of obviousness. Regarding the claimed limitation requiring that the alkali-soluble resin is included in amounts ranging from 1.0 to 3.0% by mass in the ink composition, Konishi states that the alkali-soluble resin may be included in an amount of 5 parts or more per 100 parts by mass of pigment within the composition (equivalent to 5% of the mass of the pigment), from the standpoint of improving dispersibility ([0058]). Konishi further teaches that when white pigment is used, the pigment is included in amounts ranging from 4 to 30 wt% of the ink composition ([0057]). The amount of alkali-soluble resin within the formulations of Konishi which contain white pigment may therefore range from about 0.2 to about 1.5 wt% or more, which overlaps the claimed range of “1.0 to 3.0% by mass,” establishing a prima facie case of obviousness. A resin emulsion ([0023]), which contains a water-dispersed resin ([0050]), wherein the resin has a glass transition temperature ranging from -50 to 0°C ([0052]-[0053]). This range overlaps the claimed range of “-25°C to 10°C,” establishing a prima facie case of obviousness A surfactant ([0023]), which may be a silicone-based surfactant ([0053]). Water ([0023]) Regarding claim 2, Konishi teaches that the percentage of solids in the resin emulsion may range from 1 to 25 wt% ([0059]) which overlaps the claimed range of “10.0 to 30.0% by mass,” establishing a prima facie case of obviousness. Regarding claims 3-8, Konishi teaches that the composition is useful for inkjet printing and textile printing (e.g., [0006] and [0073], wherein Konishi teaches printing onto fabrics/textiles and the specific use of the inventive inkjet composition in an inkjet recording device). The composition of Konishi therefore reads on the claimed limitations requiring said composition be adapted for both inkjet and textile printing. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA CALEB BLEDSOE whose telephone number is (703)756-5376. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Jones can be reached at 571-270-7733. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHUA CALEB BLEDSOE/Examiner, Art Unit 1762
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 26, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767812
THERMOPLASTIC RESIN COMPOSITION AND MOLDED ARTICLE THEREOF
4y 7m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760153
SOLVENT-FREE LIQUID FROM REGENERATED SILK FIBROIN: A WRITEABLE AND SHAPEABLE MATERIAL
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12742039
METHOD FOR PREPARING GLUTARYL-BRIDGED BIS-BIOGENIC GUANIDINE CHELATE AND METHOD FOR PREPARING POLYBUTYLENE SUCCINATE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735571
SILICONE FORMULATION WITH HIGH TEMPERATURE STABILITY AND CLARITY
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735526
POLYURETHANE-REACTIVE SYSTEM FOR PULTRUSION
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+45.8%)
3y 5m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 107 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month