Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/724,858

SWITCH POWER SUPPLY CIRCUIT AND TERMINAL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Examiner
DE LEON DOMENECH, RAFAEL O
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Honor Device Co., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
418 granted / 477 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
494
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.4%
+0.4% vs TC avg
§102
39.5%
-0.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 477 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is in response to the preliminary amendment filed on June 27, 2024. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Inventorship This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 08/30/2024 and 03/04/2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings were filed on June 27, 2024. These drawings are accepted by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by D’Souza et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2021/0265911 A1). In re claim 12, D’Souza discloses (Fig. 1) a terminal device (100), comprising: a boost switch power supply circuit or a buck switch power supply circuit (D’Souza discloses power supply 130 as a boost power supply, but also indicated the power supply 130 can be implemented as a buck power supply as well, Para. 0023); wherein the boost switch power supply circuit or the buck switch power supply circuit (130) is configured to supply power to a to-be-powered device in the terminal device, and the to-be-powered device comprises a speaker power amplifier (Speaker 120, Para. 0017-0024) or a liquid crystal display (LCD) backlight device. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-11 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding to claim 1, the prior art of record fails to disclose or suggest “one end of the first inductor is connected to a positive input end of the boost switch power supply circuit, and another end of the first inductor is connected to a first end of the first switch transistor; a second end of the first switch transistor is connected to ground, and a control end of the first switch transistor is connected to a drive signal controller; a first end of the second switch transistor is connected to a public node of the first inductor and the first switch transistor, a second end of the second switch transistor is connected to a positive output end of the boost switch power supply circuit, and a control end of the second switch transistor is connected to the control circuit; the control circuit comprises a first voltage divider circuit and a second voltage divider circuit, and the control circuit outputs a control signal for controlling a switch status of the second switch transistor; the first voltage divider circuit is connected in parallel between the first end of the first switch transistor and the second end of the first switch transistor; the second voltage divider circuit is connected between the second end of the second switch transistor and the ground, the second voltage divider circuit comprises at least two resistors connected in series, a third switch transistor is connected in series between the at least two resistors, a first end of the third switch transistor is connected to the control end of the second switch transistor, and a control end of the third switch transistor is connected to a middle node of the first voltage divider circuit; and the output capacitor is connected in parallel between the positive output end and the ground” in combination with other limitations of the claim. Claims 2-6 depend directly or indirectly from claim 1 and are, therefore, also allowable at least for the same reasons set above. Regarding to claim 7, the prior art of record fails to disclose or suggest “a first end of the first switch transistor is connected to a positive input end of the buck switch power supply circuit, a second end of the first switch transistor is connected to one end of the first inductor, and a control end of the first switch transistor is connected to a drive signal controller; another end of the first inductor is connected to a positive output end of the buck switch power supply circuit; a first end of the second switch transistor is connected to a first public node of the first switch transistor and the first inductor, a second end of the second switch transistor is connected to ground, and a control end of the second switch transistor is connected to the control circuit; the control circuit comprises a first voltage divider circuit and a second voltage divider circuit, and the control circuit outputs a control signal for controlling a switch status of the second switch transistor; the first voltage divider circuit is connected in parallel between the first end of the second switch transistor and the second end of the second switch transistor; the second voltage divider circuit is connected between the another end of the first inductor and the ground, the second voltage divider circuit comprises at least two resistors connected in series, a third switch transistor is connected in series between the at least two resistors, a first end of the third switch transistor is connected to the control end of the second switch transistor, and a control end of the third switch transistor is connected to a middle node of the first voltage divider circuit; and the output capacitor is connected in parallel between the positive output end and the ground” in combination with other limitations of the claim. Claims 8-11 depend directly or indirectly from claim 7 and are, therefore, also allowable at least for the same reasons set above. Claims 13-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding to claim 13, the prior art of record fails to disclose or suggest “one end of the first inductor is connected to a positive input end of the boost switch power supply circuit, and another end of the first inductor is connected to a first end of the first switch transistor; a second end of the first switch transistor is connected to ground, and a control end of the first switch transistor is connected to a drive signal controller; a first end of the second switch transistor is connected to a public node of the first inductor and the first switch transistor, a second end of the second switch transistor is connected to a positive output end of the boost switch power supply circuit, and a control end of the second switch transistor is connected to the first control circuit; the first control circuit comprises a first voltage divider circuit and a second voltage divider circuit, and the first control circuit outputs a control signal for controlling a switch status of the second switch transistor; the first voltage divider circuit is connected in parallel between the first end of the first switch transistor and the second end of the first switch transistor; the second voltage divider circuit is connected between the second end of the second switch transistor and the ground, the second voltage divider circuit comprises at least two resistors connected in series, a third switch transistor is connected in series between the at least two resistors, a first end of the third switch transistor is connected to the control end of the second switch transistor, and a control end of the third switch transistor is connected to a middle node of the first voltage divider circuit; and the first output capacitor is connected in parallel between the positive output end and the ground” in combination with other limitations of the claim. Claims 14-16 depend directly or indirectly from claim 13 and are, therefore, also objected at least for the same reasons set above. Regarding to claim 17, the prior art of record fails to disclose or suggest “a first end of the fourth switch transistor is connected to a positive input end of the buck switch power supply circuit, a second end of the fourth switch transistor is connected to one end of the second inductor, and a control end of the fourth switch transistor is connected to a drive signal controller; another end of the second inductor is connected to a positive output end of the buck switch power supply circuit; a first end of the fifth switch transistor is connected to a first public node of the fourth switch transistor and the second inductor, a second end of the fifth switch transistor is connected to ground, and a control end of the fifth switch transistor is connected to the second control circuit; the second control circuit comprises a third voltage divider circuit and a fourth voltage divider circuit, and the second control circuit outputs a control signal for controlling a switch status of the fifth switch transistor; the third voltage divider circuit is connected in parallel between the first end of the fifth switch transistor and the second end of the fifth switch transistor; the fourth voltage divider circuit is connected between the another end of the second inductor and the ground, the fourth voltage divider circuit comprises at least two resistors connected in series, a sixth switch transistor is connected in series between the at least two resistors, a first end of the sixth switch transistor is connected to the control end of the fifth switch transistor, and a control end of the sixth switch transistor is connected to a middle node of the third voltage divider circuit; and the second output capacitor is connected in parallel between the positive output end and the ground” in combination with other limitations of the claim. Claims 18-20 depend directly or indirectly from claim 17 and are, therefore, also objected at least for the same reasons set above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAFAEL O. DE LEÓN DOMENECH whose telephone number is (571)270-0517. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 a.m. -5:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hammond Crystal can be reached at (571) 270-1682. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAFAEL O DE LEON DOMENECH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 30, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603583
ISOLATED DC-DC CONVERTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597863
ISOLATED BUCK-BOOST TOPOLOGIES AND CONTROL THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592641
BIDIRECTIONAL HIGH VOLTAGE GAIN DC-DC POWER CONVERTER WITH AUTOMATIC CURRENT SHARING FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587096
A POWER CONVERTER WITH INDUCTOR CURRENT MONITORING CIRCUIT BASED ON INDUCTOR VOLTAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580475
SWITCHING CONVERTER EQUIPPED WITH NEGATIVE CURRENT TRACKING CONTROL FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+5.6%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 477 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month