Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/724,895

USER EQUIPMENT, BASE STATION, AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A HYBRID AUTOMATIC REPEAT REQUEST (HARQ) PROCESS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 27, 2024
Priority
Dec 27, 2021 — provisional 63/266,048 +1 more
Examiner
PHAM, BRENDA H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sharp Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
1071 granted / 1180 resolved
+30.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1199
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
§103
46.3%
+6.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1180 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 19 September 2024 is being considered by the examiner. Claims 1-20 are pending. Figure 6 of the application illustrates the claimed invention. PNG media_image1.png 461 649 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 8 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (WO 2008/042906 A2) in view of WO 2007/046764 A1. Regarding claims 1, 8 and 15, (WO 2008/042906 A2) discloses a method performed by a user equipment (UE) for controlling a hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process, the method comprising: receiving a handover command from a serving cell via broadcast signaling, the handover command (WO 2008/042906 A2) discloses a handover to any cell of target base station. ([0030]: “The UE may obtain a list of candidate cells of the target eNB, which are candidates for handover, in various manners. In one design, the source eNB may send the list of candidate cells to the UE, e.g., by including cell IDs of these cells in a Handover Command message send to direct the UE to perform handover...The UE may select one candidate cell at a time from the list to attempt handover, starting with the first cell in the list.”). (WO 2008/042906 A2) fails to teach the handover command comprising at least one of HARQ feedback configuration or a HARQ state configuration associated with a candidate cell. (WO 2007/127557 A2) in the same field of invention, teaches (“In step 340, the wireless communication device 200 can receive information. For example, the wireless communication device 200 can receive automatic repeat request feedback message from a candidate cell of the multiple candidate cells, the hybrid automatic repeat feedback message indicating receipt of the channel quality indicator message. As another example, the wireless communication device 200 can receive information from the serving cell regarding which candidate cell to select as the new serving cell. The wireless communication device 200 can also determine which candidate cell to select as the new serving cell. Page 7, lines 20-32). Therefore, it would have been obvious to those having ordinary skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement the UE to receive a hybrid automatic repeat request message from a candidate cell of the multiple cells, the HARQ feedback message indicating receipt of the channel quality indicator message. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7, 9-14 and 16-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRENDA H PHAM whose telephone number is (571)272-3135. The examiner can normally be reached 571-272-3135. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Charles Jiang can be reached at 571-270-7191. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BRENDA H. PHAM Primary Examiner Art Unit 2412 /BRENDA H PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2412
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684450
EXTENDING LOCAL CELLULAR WAN CAPABILITIES TO A CONNECTED DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683730
COOPERATIVE TRANSMISSION METHOD BASED ON ADAPTIVE TERMINAL AGGREGATION
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677290
PHYSICAL DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL DETECTION METHOD AND RELATED APPARATUS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677311
METHODS OF MULTIPLEXING A HIGH PRIORITY SR ON A LOW PRIORITY PUSCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671460
CONFIGURABLE TRANSMIT-RECEIVE SWITCH FOR A TRANSCEIVER
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+2.0%)
2y 7m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1180 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month