Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/725,166

High Bio-Content Polyurethane Hot Melt Adhesive Composition

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 28, 2024
Priority
Jan 13, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022071706
Examiner
LEONARD, MICHAEL L
Art Unit
1746
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
OA Round
2 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
866 granted / 1359 resolved
-1.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
1419
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1359 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-15 and 19-21 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 3, 5-15, and 21-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2021/0163801 to Ward et al. (Cited on IDS) in view of in view of U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2022/0340796 to Komatsuzaki. As to claims 1-3, 5-7, 12, 14, and 21-25, Ward discloses a bio-based reactive polyurethane hotmelt adhesive comprising 14% by weight of 4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate and a polyol mixture comprising 20.67% of bio-based polyether, 21% of acrylate resin dianal, 6% by weight of crystalline polyester polyol (Dynacoll 7380), 20% by weight of bio-based crystalline polyester (Terra 481), and 17.7% of bio-based amorphous polyester (Priplast 3238) (Example 7, Table 1). The adhesive composition contains 58.37% by weight of bio-based reactants or materials. Ward further discloses embodiments wherein 100% of the polyether polyol is bio-based, 75% of the crystalline polyester polyol is biobased and at least 50% of said amorphous polyester polyol is bio-based (0104). Terra 481 has an hydroxyl value of 30 mgKOH/g, a molecular weight of 3500 g/mol, a glass transition of -45 °C, and a melting point of 55.0°C (See data sheet attached). Ward discloses crystalline polyester polyols made from decanedioic acid and 1,2-propanediol or decanedioic acid and 1,4-butanediol, or butanedioc acid and 1,4-butanediol (0043). Ward discloses amorphous polyester polyols made from C10-C30 fatty acids, C2-C4 diol, (preferably 1,3-propanediol) and C8-C16 dicarboxylic acid (0055). Priplast 3238 is an amorphous polyester polyol that has a molecular weight of 2,000 g/mol and glass transition temperatures of amorphous polyesters typically range from 50-80°C (Google search). Ward does not expressly disclose the use of biomass reactant derived ethylene glycol to prepare the crystalline polyester polyol. However, within the same field of endeavor Komatsuzaki discloses moisture curable hot melt polyurethane adhesives comprising the reaction product of polyisocyanates and a polyester polyol mixture that includes a polyester polyol derived from biomass-derived polybasic acids and glycols preferably sebacic acid and ethylene glycol (0014-0016) wherein the content of bio-based polyester polyol ranges from 20 to 80 mass% from the viewpoint of obtaining excellent film strength and adhesiveness to certain fabrics (0021). At the time of filing it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to substitute the solid polyester polyol taught in Ward with the biomass derived polyester polyol in Komatsuzaki to prepare an adhesive that is environmentally friendly (0009) while still providing excellent adhesiveness and film strength (0009). As to claim 8, Ward discloses wherein the adhesive further contains a bio-based polyether polyol and a thermoplastic acrylic resin (Example 7). As to claim 9, Ward discloses embodiments wherein 100% of the polyether polyol is bio- based, 75% of the crystalline polyester polyol is biobased and at least 50% of said amorphous polyester polyol is bio-based (0104). As to claim 10, Ward discloses wherein the hotmelt adhesive comprises 20% by weight of bio-based crystalline polyester (Terra 481). As to claim 11, Ward discloses wherein the hotmelt adhesive comprises 17.7% of bio- based amorphous polyester (Priplast 3238) (Example 7). As to claims 13, 15, and 26, Ward discloses suitable catalysts used in amounts that range from 0.1 to 1.0% by weight (0069), such as dimorpholine o-diethylether (Example 7). Claims 4 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2021/0163801 to Ward et al. (Cited on IDS) in view of in view of U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2022/0340796 to Komatsuzaki that has been explained above and is applied here as such in view of U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2013/0231445 to Vendamme et al. As to claims 4 and 20, Ward discloses a bio-based reactive polyurethane hotmelt adhesive comprising 14% by weight of 4,4-diphenylmethane diisocyanate and a polyol mixture comprising 20.67% of bio-based polyether, 21% of acrylate resin dianal, 6% by weight of crystalline polyester polyol (Dynacoll 7380), 20% by weight of bio-based crystalline polyester(Terra 481), and 17.7% of bio-based amorphous polyester (Priplast 3238) (Example 7, Table 1). The adhesive composition contains 58.37% by weight of bio-based reactants or materials. Ward further discloses embodiments wherein 100% of the polyether polyol is bio-based, 75% of the crystalline polyester polyol is biobased and at least 50% of said amorphous polyester polyol is bio-based (0104). Ward discloses amorphous polyester polyols made from C10-C30 fatty acids, C2-C4 diol, (preferably 1,3-propanediol) and C8-C16 dicarboxylic acid (0055). Priplast 3238 is an amorphous polyester polyol that has a molecular weight of 2,000 g/mol and glass transition temperatures of amorphous polyesters typically range from 50-80°C (Google search). Ward does not expressly disclose an amorphous polyester polyol derived from anhydrohexitol, in particular isosorbide. However, within the same field of endeavor, Vendamme discloses polyurethane adhesive (0041-0044, 0115) derived from diisocyanates and a polyester polyol made from a dimer of a fatty acid, azelaic acid, and isosorbide (Examples). At the time of filing it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate isosorbide into the polyester polyol preparation of Ward as taught in Vendamme to allow for the modification of the glass transition temperature of the adhesive and tuning the visco-elastic properties, which allows for better adhesion on a variety of substrates and better cohesion of the adhesive (0136). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL L LEONARD whose telephone number is (571)270-7450. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 7:00-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Del Sole can be reached at 571-272-1130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL L LEONARD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2024
Application Filed
May 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 04, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767755
POLYURETHANES, POLISHING ARTICLES AND POLISHING SYSTEMS THEREFROM AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12753265
Process for Preparing Carbodiimides
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753284
METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A POLYURETHANE SANDWICH ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12747355
RESIN COMPOSITION AND ARTICLE MADE THEREFROM
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742042
POLYETHER DERIVATIVE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (+8.3%)
3y 1m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1359 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month