Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/725,444

DISPERSION ELECTROLYTE FOR GRAPHITE-CONTAINING LAYERS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 28, 2024
Examiner
HASKE, WOJCIECH
Art Unit
1794
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Dr -Ing Max Schlötter GmbH & Co. Kg
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
417 granted / 571 resolved
+8.0% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
610
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
27.0%
-13.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 571 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II (claims 16, 17, 19, 20 and 22) in the reply filed on 10/29/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 16, 17 and 31 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Omura et al. (JP 2002180296 A, machine translation). Considering claims 16 and 17, Omura discloses a coated metal substrate, wherein the metal substrate is coated with a graphite-containing nickel layer, wherein the graphite-containing layer contains 3%, which is within the claimed range of from 0.1 to 8 wt% graphite relative to the total weight of the graphite-containing layer (page 9, lines 21-27). Considering claim 31, Omura discloses a battery comprising the coated metal substrate (abstract). Claim(s) 16 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Schmidt et al. (US 6852445 B1). Considering claims 16 and 17, Schmidt discloses a coated metal substrate, wherein the metal substrate is coated with a graphite-containing nickel layer, wherein the graphite-containing layer contains 1.8%, which is within the claimed range of from 0.1 to 8 wt% graphite relative to the total weight of the graphite-containing layer (col. 4, lines 30-46). Claim(s) 16 and 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Takei et al. (US 20060068220 A1) Considering claims 16 and 17, Takei discloses a coated metal substrate, wherein the metal substrate is coated with a graphite-containing tin layer, wherein the graphite-containing layer contains 0.1 to 1.0 wt%, which is within the claimed range of from 0.1 to 8 wt% graphite relative to the total weight of the graphite-containing layer [0013]. Considering claim 26, Takei discloses the graphite particles have a median diameter of 3.4 µm [0017]. Considering claim 27, Takei discloses the graphite-containing layer has a layer thickness of 0.5 to 10 µm [0013]. Considering claim 28, Takei discloses the graphite-containing layer is a final layer [0013]. Considering claim 29, Takei discloses the substrate is a metal component [0016]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 19, 20, 22 and 30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Takei et al. (US 20060068220 A1) in view of Funk et al. (WO 2016131916 A1, machine translation). Considering claims 19, 20 and 30, Takei discloses tin layer with graphite at 0.1 to 1.0 wt%. Takei does not disclose a graphite-containing tin-nickel layer and has a nickel content of 10 to 40 wt% relative to the metals tin and nickel. However, Funk discloses tin-nickel layers with a composition 65 wt% Sn and about 35 wt% Ni show a high corrosion resistance and good hardness of at least HV 750 (page 3, last 3 lines and page 4, 3rd paragraph). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have a tin nickel alloy with nickel at 35 wt% in the graphite-containing layer of Takei, because Funk teaches that such alloy shows a high corrosion resistance and good hardness of at least HV 750. Considering claim 22, Takei discloses contact resistance of 1 mΩ or less [0008]. Takei does not disclose the contact resistance is measured in relation to a gold contact at 25°C. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use gold contact at 25°C, because gold is conventionally used for contact resistance measurement at room temperature. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Wojciech Haske whose telephone number is (571)272-5666. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:30 am - 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Lin can be reached at 571-272-8902. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WOJCIECH HASKE/Examiner, Art Unit 1794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601068
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CARBON MONOXIDE OR ORGANIC COMPOUND
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601079
HIGH HEAT-RESISTANT ANTIOXIDANT SOLUTIONS FOR LITHIUM BATTERY COPPER FOIL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601069
MEMBRANE ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY FOR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION, ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL COMPRISING THE SAME, AND METHOD FOR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595581
COPLANARITY IMPROVEMENT OF HIGH-RATE CU PILLAR PROCESSES USING HIGH AGITATION TO ENABLE USE OF HIGH ACID, LOW CU CHEMISTRIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595570
METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ELECTROLYSIS PLANT, AND ELECTROLYSIS PLANT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+17.6%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 571 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month