Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/725,539

DECORATIVE FILM AND VEHICLE WITH A DECORATIVE FILM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 28, 2024
Priority
Jan 01, 2022 — DE 10 2022 000 005.9 +1 more
Examiner
CHUNG, DAVID Y
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
E Ink Holdings Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
493 granted / 707 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
739
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
84.3%
+44.3% vs TC avg
§102
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
§112
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 707 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by DE19958720A1. As to claim 1, DE19958720A1 discloses in figure 5, a decorative film comprising: a decorative layer; and a plurality of expansion regions 10, each expansion region having an expansion element which is formed by at least one expansion slit 11 that penetrates the decorative film in the thickness direction. The preamble reciting “for application to a surface having non-planar surface regions” is not given patentable weight because it is merely a statement of intended use for the decorative film, and does not limit the structure of the decorative film. The claim further recites “a plurality of compression regions and/or expansion regions”, and therefore does not require any compression regions. The claim further recites “wherein the decorative film is inherently stiff”. This is believed to be met by the decorative film of DE19958720A1 in light of applicant’s specification (page 2, last paragraph). As to claim 5, DE19958720A1 discloses all of the elements of the claimed invention discussed above regarding claim 1. DE19958720A1 further discloses in figure 5, wherein the at least one expansion slit 11 has longitudinal edges that are parallel to one another when the decorative film is laid flat and the at least one expansion slit has a constant slit width. As to claim 10, DE19958720A1 discloses all of the elements of the claimed invention discussed above regarding claim 1. DE19958720A1 further discloses in figure 5, that the expansion regions 10 have a greater number of slits 11 (expansion elements) per unit area than non-expansion regions 15. The expansion regions 10 form convex surface regions having a smaller radius of curvature than the non-expansion regions 15 when the decorative film expands. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-4, 6-9 and 11-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: none of the prior art taught or fairly suggested a decorative film comprising the combination required by claims 2-4, 6-9, 11 and 16-18, wherein the decorative film further comprises the compression regions having a star-shaped or diamond-shaped compression element as recited in claim 1. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: none of the prior art taught or fairly suggested a decorative film comprising the combination required by claim 12, wherein the decorative layer is configured such that the light reflection properties or light transmission properties of the decorative layer can be changed by applying an electrical voltage thereto. Claims 13-14 are objected to by virtue of their dependency. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: none of the prior art taught or fairly suggested a vehicle comprising the combination required by claim 15, and further comprising the decorative film recited in claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to David Chung whose telephone number is (571)272-2288. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:30 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Caley can be reached at (571)272-2286. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID Y CHUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676421
INTELLIGENT REFLECTING SURFACE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669882
DISPLAY PANELS AND ARRAY BASEPLATES
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669725
LIQUID CRYSTAL PANEL, LIQUID CRYSTAL PANEL APPARATUS, AND IMAGER
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663676
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663683
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+7.9%)
2y 10m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 707 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month