Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/726,004

CHASSIS OF A VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 01, 2024
Priority
Jan 12, 2022 — DE 10 2022 200 232.6 +1 more
Examiner
RESTIFO, JEFFREY J
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
841 granted / 1062 resolved
+27.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1077
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
47.7%
+7.7% vs TC avg
§102
39.4%
-0.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1062 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 3 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species B, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 6/10/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 14, and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Landgraf (US 9,579,963 B2). With respect to claims 1, 14, and 15, Landgraf discloses a vehicle with chassis or frame 5, front and rear wheels inherently with axles (not numbered), and batteries 2 arranged between said axles and also outside said axles, said batteries supported on said chassis, as shown in figure 2. PNG media_image1.png 548 377 media_image1.png Greyscale With respect to claim 2, said batteries are in housings 3, 4, supported by said chassis, as shown in figure 2. With respect to claim 4, said battery arrangement includes tree separate battery modules 3, 4, interconnected, as shown in figure 2. With respect to claim 5, an intermediate battery module 3 is located in the central portion of the chassis, and front and rear battery modules at the front and rear sections of the vehicle, as shown in figure 2. With respect to claims 7 and 8, said batteries are within a receiving chamber 7, said chamber fully enclosed with said batteries, as shown in figure 2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6, 9-13, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Landgraf, as applied to claim 1 above. With respect to claims, 6, 9-13, and 16, Landgraf does not explicitly disclose the motor, electrical connections between said batteries, or cooling circuit. These features are considered conventional in the art of vehicle battery systems and therefore, It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the motor, the electrical connecting lines, and a cooling circuit, into the receiving chamber of the vehicle of Landgraf in order to provide power from said batteries to a motor to drive said wheels, and prevent the batteries from overheating, as is considered conventional in the art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFREY J RESTIFO whose telephone number is (571)272-6697. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11am-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, J. Allen Shriver can be reached at (303) 297-4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JEFFREY J. RESTIFO Primary Examiner Art Unit 3613 /JEFFREY J RESTIFO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741544
VEHICLE BODY LOWER STRUCTURE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734907
ELECTRICALLY DRIVEN WORK MACHINE
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735086
VERTICALLY-MOVABLE, TRANSMISSION-FRIENDLY, AND CONTROLLABLE STROLLER
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728858
SYSTEM FOR BRAKING AN ELECTRIFIED VEHICLE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12719127
BATTERY CASE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.6%)
2y 5m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1062 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month