Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/726,085

AUDIO DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 01, 2024
Examiner
YU, NORMAN
Art Unit
2693
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
525 granted / 598 resolved
+25.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
633
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.8%
+11.8% vs TC avg
§102
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 598 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: Audio Device With Audio Output in an Upward Direction. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3 and 8-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsurumoto (WO 2021/145152) in view of Yasuda (US 2011/0160883). Regarding claim 1, Tsurumoto teaches An audio device comprising: a first speaker disposed on a left side (Tsurumoto figure 3, Speaker LSP); a second speaker disposed on a right side (Tsurumoto figure 3, Speaker RSP); a third speaker disposed between the first speaker and the second speaker (Tsurumoto figure 3, Speaker CSP); and a controller, wherein: the first to third speakers are arranged to output audio in an upward direction (Tsurumoto figure 3, and ¶0025, “face upward at a predetermined angle with respect to the bottom surface 36E”), however does not explicitly teach the controller generates a third channel signal corresponding to the third speaker based on a first channel signal corresponding to the first speaker and a second channel signal corresponding to the second speaker, and outputs audio corresponding to the third channel signal through the third speaker. Yasuda teaches the controller generates a third channel signal (Yasuda figure 7, 703c) corresponding to the third speaker (Yasuda figure 7, speaker 706c) based on a first channel signal corresponding to the first speaker (Yasuda figure 7, Stereo digital audio signals signal 701a) and a second channel signal corresponding to the second speaker (Yasuda figure 7, Stereo digital audio signals signal 701b), and outputs audio corresponding to the third channel signal through the third speaker (Yasuda figure 7, speaker 706c). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the known technique of Yasuda to improve the known audio device of Tsurumoto to achieve the predictable result of reduced power consumption (Yasuda ¶0069, “it is possible to combine L and R in a digital acoustic playback system covering low pass, the low power consumption characteristics of the acoustic playback system can be further optimized”). Regarding claims 2 and 9, Tsurumoto in view of Yasuda teaches wherein a separation distance between the first speaker and the third speaker is equal to a separation distance between the second speaker and the third speaker (Tsurumoto ¶0067, “when the speaker units are arranged at equal intervals on the same surface”). Regarding claims 3 and 10, Tsurumoto in view of Yasuda teaches wherein the controller generates the third channel signal based on a result of adding up the first channel signal and the second channel signal (Yasuda figure 7, 703c from summer). Regarding claim 8, Tsurumoto teaches A method of operating an audio device, the method comprising: the first speaker disposed on a left side (Tsurumoto figure 3, Speaker LSP), the second speaker disposed on a right side (Tsurumoto figure 3, Speaker RSP), and the third speaker disposed between the first speaker and the second speaker (Tsurumoto figure 3, Speaker CSP); wherein the first to third speakers are arranged to output audio in an upward direction (Tsurumoto figure 3, and ¶0025, “face upward at a predetermined angle with respect to the bottom surface 36E”), however does not explicitly teach generating a third channel signal corresponding to a third speaker based on a first channel signal corresponding to a first speaker and a second channel signal corresponding to a second speaker, and outputting audio corresponding to the third channel signal through the third speaker. Yasuda teaches generating a third channel signal (Yasuda figure 7, 703c) corresponding to a third speaker (Yasuda figure 7, speaker 706c) based on a first channel signal corresponding to a first speaker (Yasuda figure 7, Stereo digital audio signals signal 701a) and a second channel signal corresponding to a second speaker (Yasuda figure 7, Stereo digital audio signals signal 701b), and outputting audio corresponding to the third channel signal through the third speaker (Yasuda figure 7, speaker 706c). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the known technique of Yasuda to improve the known audio device of Tsurumoto to achieve the predictable result of reduced power consumption (Yasuda ¶0069, “it is possible to combine L and R in a digital acoustic playback system covering low pass, the low power consumption characteristics of the acoustic playback system can be further optimized”). Claim(s) 4, 6, 11, and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsurumoto (WO 2021/145152) in view of Yasuda (US 2011/0160883) in further view of 958’ (KR19980036958). Regarding claims 4 and 11, Tsurumoto in view of Yasuda does not explicitly teach wherein the controller calculates a correlation coefficient between the first channel signal and the second channel signal, and generates the third channel signal based on the calculated correlation coefficient. 958’ teaches wherein the controller calculates a correlation coefficient between the first channel signal and the second channel signal, and generates the third channel signal based on the calculated correlation coefficient (958’ page 3 ¶7, “That is, the scale ratio of the audio data of the center channel is determined by the correlation between the audio data of the two left and right channels, and the center channel data is generated according to the determined scale ratio, thereby further enhancing the stereoscopic effect of the audio system”). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the known technique of 958’ to improve the known audio device of Tsurumoto in view of Yasuda to achieve the predictable result of enhancing the stereoscopic effect of the audio system (958’ page 3 ¶7). Regarding claims 6 and 13, Tsurumoto in view of Yasuda in further view of 958’ teaches wherein the controller is configured to: generate a first output signal corresponding to the first channel signal and a second output signal corresponding to the second channel signal based on the calculated correlation coefficient (958’ figure 2 and Page 3 ¶3, output 19 is based on scale rate table 18 which is determined based on correlation between left and right channel. Calculated correlation from calculator 12 is stored in 10 and 11); output audio corresponding to the first output signal through the first speaker; and output audio corresponding to the second output signal through the second speaker (Tsurumoto figure 3, Speaker LSP and RSP). Claim(s) 5 and 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsurumoto (WO 2021/145152) in view of Yasuda (US 2011/0160883) in further view of 958’ (KR19980036958) in further view of Schuijers (US 2005/0177360). Regarding claims 5 and 12, Tsurumoto in view of Yasuda in further view of 958’ does not explicitly teach herein the controller calculates the correlation coefficient between a waveform of the first channel signal and a waveform of the second channel signal in a time domain based on a predetermined sampling rate, and generates a waveform, corresponding to the waveform of the first channel signal and the waveform of the second channel signal, as the third channel signal based on the calculated correlation coefficient. Schuijers teaches herein the controller calculates the correlation coefficient between a waveform of the first channel signal and a waveform of the second channel signal in a time domain (Schuijers ¶0026, “a parameter (r) that describes the similarity or dissimilarity of the waveforms” and “ITD”) based on a predetermined sampling rate (Schuijers ¶0057, “the left and right incoming signals are split up in various time frames (2048 samples at 44.1 kHz sampling rate)”), and generates a waveform, corresponding to the waveform of the first channel signal and the waveform of the second channel signal, as the third channel signal based on the calculated correlation coefficient the left and right incoming signals are split up in various time frames (2048 samples at 44.1 kHz sampling rate). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the known technique of Schuijers to improve the known audio device of Tsurumoto in view of Yasuda in further view of 958’ to achieve the predictable result of reducing artifacts related to parametric multi-channel coding (Schuijers ¶0012). Claim(s) 7 and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tsurumoto (WO 2021/145152) in view of Yasuda (US 2011/0160883) in further view of Sakamoto (US 2008/0240474). Regarding claims 7 and 14, Tsurumoto in view of Yasuda teaches wherein the controller is configured to: generate a reservation signal based on the first channel signal and the second channel signal (Yasuda figure 22, 2203c); and generate the third channel signal based on a result of mixing the reservation channel signal and a fourth channel signal (Yasuda figure 22, ¶0104, “Digital signals (2205a, 2205b) from digital filters (2202a, 2202b) each of which processes L and R digital signals respectively, and the digital signal (2202c) from the digital filter (2202c) which processes the quasi-surround digital signal, are combined and input to the speakers (2206a, 2206b, 2206c, 2206d”), however does not explicitly teach a fourth speaker disposed to output audio in a forward direction in response to the third speaker. Sakamoto teaches a fourth speaker disposed to output audio in a forward direction in response to the third speaker (Sakamoto ¶0013). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the known technique of Sakamoto to improve the known audio device of Tsurumoto in view of Yasuda to achieve the predictable result of an adaptive sound field when speaker location changes. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NORMAN YU whose telephone number is (571)270-7436. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon - Fri 11am-7pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ahmad Matar can be reached on 571-272-7488. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Any response to this action should be mailed to: Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Va. 22313-1450 Or faxed to: (571) 273-8300, for formal communications intended for entry and for informal or draft communications, please label “PROPOSED” or “DRAFT”. Hand-delivered responses should be brought to: Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Arlington, VA 22314 Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NORMAN YU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2693
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604123
APPARATUS AND VEHICULAR APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598409
IN-EAR WEARABLE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594882
AUTOMOTIVE SOUND AMPLIFICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593165
ACOUSTIC INPUT-OUTPUT DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581238
BINDING BAND ASSEMBLY FOR HEADSET AND HEADSET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.5%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 598 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month