Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/726,604

Apparatus and Method for Loading Unit Cell

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 03, 2024
Priority
Feb 15, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0019801 +1 more
Examiner
HOLMES, JUSTIN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1148 granted / 1291 resolved
+28.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1303
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
58.0%
+18.0% vs TC avg
§102
8.5%
-31.5% vs TC avg
§112
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1291 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-15 are pending. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on July 3, 2024 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 6, 9-12, 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Korean Patent No. KR20160076796 to Kim et al. in view of European Patent No. EP3832526 to Nilsson et al. (A machine translation of the documents are enclosed with this action and referred to herein). Regarding claims 1 and 10, the Kim patent teaches an apparatus for loading a unit cell C, the apparatus comprising: a magazine configured to receive unit cells and configured to be placed into set positions. See Fig. 1. However, the Kim patent lacks a specific teaching there are a plurality of magazines. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the subject invention to modify the Kim patent to have a plurality of magazines, since it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. St Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co., 193 USPQ 8. However, the Kim patent lacks a teaching of an identification part on the magazine. The Nilsson patent teaches an identification device, label 320 that is put on a shelf and identified by a camera 10. See Fig. 1A. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the subject invention to modify the Kim patent to have the identification device of the Nilsson patent as it would have been combining known prior art elements using known method to provide the predictable result of being able to identify the items in the magazine. Regarding claims 2, 6, 11 and 12, the Nilsson patent teaches the labels can change colors (see paragraph 0090) which teaches that it is capable of a plurality of identification parts are provided in different colors to identify the plurality of magazines. Regarding claim 3, the Nilsson patent teaches that the label 320 has different images, and this this is interpreted as being capable to having the plurality of identification parts are provided in different shapes to identify the plurality of magazines, as the images can be different shapes. See paragraph 0090 of Nilsson. Regarding claim 4, the Nilsson patent teaches that label can be a barcode. See paragraph 0090. Regarding claims 9 and 15, the combined device of the Kim and Nilsson patent teaches all of the elements of the claim, except for the explicit teaching the unit cells are provided as a plurality of unit cells having differently stacked structures, and wherein the plurality of unit cells having the differently stacked structures are loaded into the plurality of magazines. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the subject invention to modify the Kim and Nilsson device to have different shacked structures for the different unit cells that are different, as it is known that unit cells can have different shapes so different magazines would be used for each different shape and this would be known in the art as a matter of design choice. Regarding claim 14, the sensing part 310 comprises a plurality of color sensors configured to sense colors of the identification parts respectively provided in the plurality of magazines. This is interpreted as camera 310 in Nilsson. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5, 7, 8 and 13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. German Patent No. DE20011990 teaches a magazine. Chinese Patent No. CN113822089 to Yan teaches a label and camera. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN HOLMES whose telephone number is (571)272-3448. The examiner can normally be reached 10AM-6PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob S Scott can be reached at 571-270-3415. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN HOLMES/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679648
Article Transport Facility
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680599
DRIVE DEVICE FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE
11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668081
TRAILER, AUXILIARY AXLE FOR A TRAILER, DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE COUPLING AND/OR UNCOUPLING BETWEEN A TRAILER AXLE AND AN AUXILIARY MOTOR
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662312
A VEHICLE FOR TRANSPORTING STORAGE CONTAINERS IN AN AUTOMATED STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662367
AUTOMATIC DISPENSING SYSTEM FOR LIQUID SAMPLES
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+9.9%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1291 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month