Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/726,826

SUSPENSION WIRING MODULE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 05, 2024
Priority
Jan 12, 2022 — JP 2022-002791 +1 more
Examiner
PAGHADAL, PARESH H
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
402 granted / 669 resolved
-7.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
712
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 669 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
CTNF 18/726,826 CTNF 89232 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Priority Acknowledgment is made wherein this application is 371 of the PCT Application PCT/JP2023/000086, being filed on January 05, 2023. 02-27 Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in present Application filed on July 05, 2024. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements filed July 05,2024 have been submitted for consideration by the Office. It has been placed in the application file and the information referred to therein has been considered. Applicants must continue to submit prior art references throughout the patent application process. A supplemental IDS must be submitted if prior art is discovered through a foreign patent application or an International Patent Search, or a related application before a prosecution closes. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 07-30-02 AIA The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 07-34-01 Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Rejections of claims 1-5, in claims 1 and 3, it is not clear that a part “a part in an extension direction of the wiring member” refresh to what wiring member or else. Note that a steering rotation center axis is imaginary axis in the limitation “a part in an extension direction of the wiring member being fixed with rotation about a steering rotation center axis stopped at a rotation stopping/fixing position on the steering rotation center axis” and it does not exist without underlying essential structure (appears to be damper 37). Something can not be fixed on the steering rotation center axis; it is only used as reference point. Fixing member 60 fixed on upper and lower arms which stop rotation of wires; not on the steering rotation center axis or a damper 38. Proper clarification required. Claims 2, and 4-5 are rejected by the same reason applied above. 07-06 AIA 15-10-15 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AlA) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 102 which forms the basis for all rejections set forth in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – 07-08-aia AIA (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 07-12-aia AIA (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 07-15 AIA Claim s 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102( a)(1)/(a)(2) (whichever apply ) as being anticipated by JP2008-308033 (cited reference), or Ishikawa (US20190111747) or Tokuda (US20070234559) . Rejections of claims 1-2, JP2008 or Ishikawa or Tokuda discloses a suspension wiring module, comprising: a wiring member (claim 1) (see figures of JP2008 or see figures of Ishikawa or see figures of Tokuda) a wiring member for connecting a vehicle body-side device and a wheel-side device; a part in an extension direction of the wiring member being fixed with rotation about a steering rotation center axis stopped at a rotation stopping/fixing position on the steering rotation center axis (claim 1); wherein the wiring member is fixed at a position different from an extension of a damper (claim 2) ( only positive structure in claim is wiring member; limitation “for connecting a vehicle body-side device and a wheel-side device… wherein the wiring member is fixed at a position different from an extension of a damper” consider to be intended use; therefore do not get any patentable weight. “for” defines intended use; and same wire can be used or attached to other part of vehicles. Note that structure is what it is, not how is been used. Furthermore, see MPEP ). Rejections of claims 3-5, JP2008 or Ishikawa or Tokuda discloses a suspension wiring module, comprising: a wiring member; the wiring member including a first linear transmission member and a second linear transmission member (claim 1) (see figures of JP2008 or see figures of Ishikawa or see figures of Tokuda). a wiring member for connecting a vehicle body-side device and a wheel-side device; a part in an extension direction of the wiring member being fixed in a rotation stopped state at a rotation stopping/fixing position on a steering rotation center axis, end parts of the respective first and second linear transmission members on side of the wheel-side device being connected to a connector at mutually different positions, and a length of the first linear transmission member from the rotation stopping/fixing position to the wheel-side device being equal to a length of the second linear transmission member from the rotation stopping/fixing position to the wheel-side device; wherein the wiring member is fixed at a position different from an extension of a damper (claim 3); wherein the wiring member is fixed by a fixing member fixed to at least one of a damper, an upper arm and a lower arm at the rotation stopping/fixing position (claim 4); and wherein the extension direction of the wiring member to the steering rotation center axis is within range of +-30 degree(claim 5) ( only positive structure in claim is wiring member as mentioned above; limitation “for connecting a vehicle body-side device and a wheel-side device… the steering rotation center axis is within range of +-30 degree” considered to be intended use; “for” defines intended use, and same wire can be used or attached other part of vehicles. therefore do not get any patentable weight. Note that structure is what it is, not how is been used). Pertinent Prior Arts The prior arts made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please refer to the enclosed PTO-892 form for the citation of pertinent arts in the present case, all of which disclose various Bus bars. Communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PARESH PAGHADAL whose telephone number is (571)272-5251. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00AM-4:00PM, Monday - Thursday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Thompson can be reached on (571)272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PARESH PAGHADAL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847 Application/Control Number: 18/726,826 Page 2 Art Unit: 2847 Application/Control Number: 18/726,826 Page 3 Art Unit: 2847 Application/Control Number: 18/726,826 Page 4 Art Unit: 2847 Application/Control Number: 18/726,826 Page 5 Art Unit: 2847 Application/Control Number: 18/726,826 Page 6 Art Unit: 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 05, 2024
Application Filed
May 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Aug 03, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772382
RESTRICTING DEVICE FOR FLEXIBLE WIRING BOARD AND DISPLAY DEVICE USING THE RESTRICTING DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12756167
Adaptor for Connecting and Securing Different Harness Protection Systems
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12745349
ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING INTERPOSER PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738923
RADIO FREQUENCY MODULE AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12715374
WIRE HARNESS
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+21.5%)
2y 9m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 669 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month