Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/727,069

METHOD FOR PROVIDING AUXILIARY INFORMATION ON DYSPHAGIA BY USING VOICE ANALYSIS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jul 05, 2024
Examiner
GETZOW, SCOTT M
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Rs Rehab Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
864 granted / 1073 resolved
+10.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1114
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1073 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 Claims 1-12,15-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. Step 1 Claims 1-12,15-22 are for a method, and thus fit into a statutory class of invention. Step 2A, prong 1 Claim 1 includes the step of comparing characteristic values. Such step is considered to be an abstract idea in the form of a mental process. The user can compare values in his head. Step 2A, prong 2 Claim 1 also includes the step of obtaining voice or vibrations. This step does not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application since it is used merely to supply data for use in the abstract idea. Re claim 2, the steps of calculating and comparing are also steps that can be done in one’s head, and thus are merely a further expression of the abstract idea. Claims 3,4 only include example of sensors, which are only used to sense sound or vibration and not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application. Re claims 5-9, the step of determining also can be considered a mental step, and thus part of the abstract idea of claim 1. Re claims 10-18 only set forth details of the sensed values, and thus do not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application. Claims 18,19 include providing control information for an electrical stimulator. However, it is not stated that the stimulator actually stimulates the patient. Thus, the elements of the claims do not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application. Claims 20,21 only include further details of the result of the abstract idea, and nothing that integrates the idea into a practical application. Claim 22 includes the step of comparing, which is part of the abstract idea of claim 1, and the step of obtaining data which merely provides data for use with the abstract idea. Step 2B The claims include a sensor array in the form of a microphone to detect voice or vibrations. Microphones are considered to be well understood, routine and conventional, considered by themselves or as a whole. The claims include no improvements to the functioning of a computer or technical field, but merely add limitations that are extra solution activity or the result of the abstract idea not tied to a special apparatus or a transformation of a particular article to a different state or thing. See MPEP 2106.05. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Oku (2016/0143575) teaches a swallowing estimation device that detects sound of the larynx before a swallowing event. Eisenfeld (2009/0316925) teaches a stethoscope that detects bowel sound before and after eating. Neither reference teaches the claimed method including providing information re whether food has been aspirated and the presence or absence of residue. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Scott M. Getzow whose telephone number is (571)272-4946. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Klein can be reached at 571-270-5213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Scott M. Getzow/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 05, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599772
Selection of Sensing Electrodes in a Spinal Cord Stimulator System Using Sensed Stimulation Artifacts
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12582817
USE OF ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE MATERIALS FOR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582823
FLEXIBLE STIMULATION PATTERNING FRAMEWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569188
DEEP SOUND STIMULATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SLEEP REGULATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569397
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LASER TREATMENT OF A DERMATOLOGIC CONDITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+0.2%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1073 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month