Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/727,615

ALLOY PARTICLE, DUST CORE, ELECTRONIC ELEMENT, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, ELECTRIC MOTOR, AND ELECTRIC GENERATOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 09, 2024
Priority
Dec 21, 2022 — JP 2022-204352 +1 more
Examiner
DUMBRIS, SETH M
Art Unit
1784
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Niterra Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
690 granted / 903 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
60 currently pending
Career history
948
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.1%
+9.1% vs TC avg
§102
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 903 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 23 June 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kawano et al. (US 2010/0239879 – previously cited). Considering claim 8, Kawano teaches an iron powder coated with an oxide (abstract). The iron powder may comprise less than 0.01 mass percent Si (Paragraph 44). The coating comprises and oxide film which is Si-based and comprises SiO2 and Fe2SiO4 in a ratio of 7 or more (Paragraph 13) and is positively taught to disclose the presence of Fe2SiO4 (Fig. 1, upper portion; Paragraph 14). While not expressly teaching a singular example of the instantly claimed alloy particle this would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date in view of the teachings of Kawano as this is considered a conventionally known combination of a core comprising Fe and optionally Si with a coating containing Fe2SiO4 known to afford high insulating properties (Paragraph 16) and one would have had a reasonable expectation of success. Further, while not expressly teaching the claimed XRD diffraction ratio of FeO/ Fe2SiO4, Kawano teaches an oxide coating directly on the iron particle and is silent regarding the presence of FeO and therefore is expected to meet the claimed ratio due to the recitation of “or lower” as ~zero is encompassed by the claimed range. See MPEP §§ 2111.01, 2111.03, 2112.01, and 2144.05. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art to the instant claims is that of Orimo (US 2018/0374619 – previously cited) which teaches an outermost coating of Fe2SiO4, and is silent regarding a positive recitation of FeO. Therefore, it would not have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to achieve the claimed ratio. Claim 8 may be placed in condition for allowance if amended to recite where the ratio is greater than 0, similar to instant claim 1. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see remarks p.4 last section - p. 6, 2nd paragraph, filed 23 June 2026, with respect to 35 USC 103 rejections in view of Orimo have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 1-7 has been withdrawn. As outlined above, applicant has amended to recite ratio features not disclosed by Orimo. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SETH DUMBRIS whose telephone number is (571)272-5105. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:00 AM - 3:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Humera Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-0604. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SETH DUMBRIS Primary Examiner Art Unit 1784 /SETH DUMBRIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1784
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Mar 11, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 26, 2026
Interview Requested
Jun 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746603
CUTTING TOOL
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742227
NICKEL-BASED ALLOY
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12729420
STEEL SHEET AND PLATED STEEL SHEET
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722444
TUBULAR STABILIZER BAR FOR A VEHICLE CHASSIS, AND VEHICLE CHASSIS COMPRISING THE TUBULAR STABILIZER BAR
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725732
RARE-EARTH IRON-BASED RING MAGNET AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+16.6%)
2y 7m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 903 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month