Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/727,963

LADDER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 10, 2024
Priority
Nov 06, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0151529 +2 more
Examiner
MATTEI, BRIAN DAVID
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Ikamper Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
496 granted / 737 resolved
+7.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
760
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.5%
+9.5% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 737 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the election filed June 16, 2026. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-11 are pending. Claims 3-5 and 7-11 are withdrawn as set forth below. Claims 1, 2 and 6 stand rejected as set forth below. Election/Restrictions Claims 3-5 and 7-11 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on June 16, 2026. Applicant's election with traverse of Species III, Figs 8-11 in the reply filed on June 16, 2026 is acknowledged. As best understood by the examiner, the traversal appears to be on the ground(s) that there are not separate patentable species. This is not found persuasive because there is a lack of unity amongst the species since the only common special technical feature of a step sheet detachably coupled to the frame is not novel in view of ikamper Co., Ltd. (KR 102228108). Thus, there is no unique technical link between the species and they lack a posteriori lack of unity. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by ikamper Co., Ltd. (KR 102228108) (hereinafter Ikamper) (published 3/16/2021). In regard to Claim 1, ikamper discloses a ladder (Fig 1) comprising: a pair of vertical frames (2a); a plurality of horizontal frames (2b) installed between the pair of vertical frames at predetermined intervals (Fig 4); and a step sheet (12) configured to be coupled to any two horizontal frames among the plurality of horizontal frames (Fig 1), respectively, to form a footrest of a ladder, wherein the step sheet may be detachably coupled to the horizontal frame through a coupling means (20, 30) (Fig 1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ikamper as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Pytiak (US Pub 2022/0183270). In regard to Claim 2, ikamper discloses the ladder as described above, but does not disclose the ladder as telescoping. Pytiak teaches wherein the pair of vertical frames include a space therein, and is configured such that a plurality of hollow pipes having different diameters are continuously connected to each other, overlapped and stacked inside each other (Figs 2, 4). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to make the ladder as disclosed by ikamper to be telescoping as taught by Pytiak, since it will make the ladder easier to move as well as require less space to store. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ikamper as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of LeGrand et al. (US 6,006,863) (hereinafter LeGrand). In regard to Claim 6, ikamper discloses the ladder as described above, wherein the coupling means comprises: and a pole member (40) formed on one side of the step sheet. Ikamper does not disclose a sliding groove formed on one side of the horizontal frame with coupling by sliding in the sliding groove. LeGrand teaches a sliding groove (3) formed on one side of the horizontal frame and coupling by sliding in the sliding groove (Fig 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the coupling of ikamper to slide the pole member into a groove as taught by LeGrand, in order to make a more secure connection between the step sheet and the ladder thereby preventing unintentional removal of the step sheet. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See list of references on PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Brian Mattei whose telephone number is (571)270-3238. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 8:00 to 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Namrata Boveja can be reached at 571-272-8105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN D MATTEI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768185
EXPANDABLE WEDGE DECK PANEL FOR A MODULAR DECK SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760552
SHUTTER MOUNTING SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12742337
SEISMIC DISSIPATOR
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12729543
Lining board arrangement and method for mounting said arrangement
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723425
FLOATING TYPE COMPREHENSIVE DISASTER PREVENTION WATER-SAVING BUILDING STRUCTURE WITH WATER DAMAGE RESISTANCE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+15.5%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 737 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month