Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/728,128

Method for Operating a Heating Arrangement for a High-Voltage Storage Module for a Motor Vehicle

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 11, 2024
Examiner
SHAAWAT, MUSSA A
Art Unit
3669
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
665 granted / 876 resolved
+23.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
905
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
§103
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
§102
37.5%
-2.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 876 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 12-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Klose et al., US pg. Pub. No. (2021/0188127) referred to hereinafter as Klose. As per claim 12, Klose teaches a method for operating a heating arrangement for a high-voltage storage module for a motor vehicle (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4), wherein the heating arrangement has a fluid heater and a resistance heater (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4), which can be arranged in intermediate spaces formed by battery cells, the method comprising: determining an operating requirement of the high-voltage storage module (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4); and operating at least one of the resistance heater or the fluid heater depending on the operating requirement (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4). As per claim 13, Klose teaches a method of claim 12, further comprising: adjusting a heating output of the resistance heater depending on the operating requirement (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4). As per claim 14, Klose teaches a method of claim 12, wherein the operating requirement is determined depending on an operating state of a motor vehicle (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4). As per claim 15, Klose teaches a method of claim 14, wherein an operating state is determined on the basis of a navigation input (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4). As per claim 16, Klose teaches a method of claim 12, wherein an operating requirement is a charging operation of the high-voltage storage module (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4). As per claim 17, Klose teaches a method of claim 12, wherein the operating requirement is a temperature of the high-voltage storage module (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4). As per claim 18, Klose teaches a method of claim 12, wherein the resistance heater is operated independently of the fluid heater (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4). As per claim 19, Klose teaches a method of claim 12, wherein the resistance heater is operated in sections (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4). As per claim 20, Klose teaches a method of claim 12, wherein the resistance heater is operated as a function of time (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4). As per claim 21, Klose teaches a method of claim 12, wherein the resistance heater is operated by means of an external energy source (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4). As per claim 22, Klose teaches a method of claim 12, wherein the resistance heater (7) is operated by means of energy from the battery cells (see at least Abstract, Summary, Para 35-36, 38, 40, 46-48, 66-67, figs. 1-4). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments have been considered but are not persuasive. In particular applicant argues that A) the prior art (Klose) fails to teach expressly teach wherein the heating arrangement has a fluid heater and a resistance heater (preamble of claim 12). In response to A) the examiner respectfully disagrees. Applicant is reminded that claims must be given their broadest reasonable interpretation. A fluid heater as defined in applicant specification para 10, is a known fluid cooling device, which is taught by Klose (see at least Abstract, Para 3, 7); furthermore the body of the claim states “resistance heater or the fluid heater depending on the operating requirement”; in addition Klose also teaches a resistance heater, Klose teaches an electrical battery heater (see at least Para 15, 37, 49, 60. Therefore Klose still meets the scope of the limitation as currently claimed. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUSSA A SHAAWAT whose telephone number is (313)446-6592. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Erin Piateski can be reached at 571-270-7429. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUSSA A SHAAWAT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3669
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 09, 2026
Response Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595070
METHOD OF OPERATING A ROTORCRAFT IN A SINGLE ENGINE OPERATION MODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595049
METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A ROTORCRAFT, ASSOCIATED ROTORCRAFT AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583605
FAST THRUST RESPONSE USING OPTIMAL POWER SPLITTING IN HYBRID ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583606
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AIRCRAFT ENERGY OPTIMIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576715
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 876 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month