Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/728,448

UCI TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS, TERMINAL, NETWORK DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 11, 2024
Priority
Jan 11, 2022 — CN 202210028088.2 +1 more
Examiner
ZHANG, ZHENSHENG
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
311 granted / 407 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
431
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
76.6%
+36.6% vs TC avg
§102
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 407 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to arguments Applicant’s arguments regarding the102 rejection have been considered and they are not persuasive. Fu clearly teaches each and every limitation in the claims. For example, applicant argues, page 3, Fu discloses PUCCHs carrying UCI, and fails to disclose PUSCH carrying UCI. … Fu fails to disclose the above-mentioned distinguishing technical features (a) and (b). The examiner respectfully disagrees. Fu teaches (a) in case that time domain resources of a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) carrying first UCI overlap with time domain resources of multiple physical uplink shared channels (PUSCHs) (Fu, fig. 9, [0129], a PUCCH carrying a UCI with priority 1 (or a first UCI), overlaps with multiple PUSCHs; there are three PUSCHs simultaneously overlapping with the PUCCH transmitting the UCI) and (b) the multiple PUSCHs comprise a PUSCH carrying second UCI ( fig. 9, [0129], the UCI with the second priority is multiplexed on PUSCH2-2. Here, when an UCI is multiplexed on a PUSCH, the PUSCH carries the UCI). Applicant argues, page 3, Fu fails to disclose the above-mentioned distinguishing technical features (c) and (d). The examiner respectfully disagrees. Fu teaches (c ) selecting a PUSCH without carrying the second UCI from the multiple PUSCHs preferentially, and transmitting the first UCI on the selected PUSCH without carrying the second UCI (fig. 9, [0129], PUSCH2-1 is selected to multiplex with the first UCI, PUSCH2-2 is selected to multiplex with the second UCI. That is, PUSCH2-1 is transmitting the first UCI without carrying the second UCI. This is also acknowledged by the applicant in the remark, page 3, 4th para., “when overlap occurs, two UCIs with different priorities are respectively multiplexed on two different PUSCH2-l and PUSCH2-2”. That is one UCI is carried by PUSCH2-1 (without carrying the other UCI) and the other UCI is carried by PUSCH2-2 (without carrying the one UCI); or, (d) selecting a target PUSCH for carrying the first UCI (fig. 9, PUSCH 2-1) from the multiple PUSCHs (fig. 9, PUSCH 2-x) and determining a corresponding UCI transmission mode based on UCI carried on the target PUSCH. It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in this claim and the examiner can only show one of the claimed options. Applicant argues, page 4, Fu fails to disclose the above-mentioned distinguishing technical features ( e ). The examiner respectfully disagrees. Fu teaches (e ) wherein the PUCCH and the PUSCH carrying the second UCI have different priorities (fig. 9, [0129], there are three PUSCHs with the second priority simultaneously overlapping with the PUCCH transmitting the UCI with the first priority), or the first UCI comprises first priority UCI and the second UCI comprises second priority UCI (fig. 9, [0129], a transmission of UCI with the first priority and a transmission of UCI with the second priority; that is, one UCI has the first priority UCI, the other UCI has the second priority UCI). It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in this claim and the examiner can only show one of the claimed options. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, 22-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Fu (US 20230189273). Regarding claim 1, Fu discloses a method for uplink control information (UCI) transmission, performed by a terminal, comprising: in case that time domain resources of a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) carrying first UCI overlap with time domain resources of multiple physical uplink shared channels (PUSCHs) (fig. 9, [0129], a PUCCH carrying a UCI with priority 1 (or a first UCI), overlaps with multiple PUSCHs; there are three PUSCHs simultaneously overlapping with the PUCCH transmitting the UCI) and the multiple PUSCHs comprise a PUSCH carrying second UCI ( fig. 9, [0129], the UCI with the second priority is multiplexed on PUSCH2-2. Here, when an UCI is multiplexed on a PUSCH, the PUSCH carries the UCI), selecting a PUSCH without carrying the second UCI from the multiple PUSCHs preferentially, and transmitting the first UCI on the selected PUSCH without carrying the second UCI (fig. 9, [0129], PUSCH2-1 is selected to multiplex with the first UCI, PUSCH2-2 is selected to multiplex with the second UCI. That is, PUSCH2-1 is transmitting the first UCI without carrying the second UCI. This is also acknowledged by the applicant in the remark, page 3, 4th para., “when overlap occurs, two UCIs with different priorities are respectively multiplexed on two different PUSCH2-l and PUSCH2-2”. That is one UCI is carried by PUSCH2-1 (without carrying the other UCI) and the other UCI is carried by PUSCH2-2 (without carrying the one UCI); or, selecting a target PUSCH for carrying the first UCI (fig. 9, PUSCH 2-1) from the multiple PUSCHs (fig. 9, PUSCH 2-x) and determining a corresponding UCI transmission mode based on UCI carried on the target PUSCH (fig. 9, UGI transmission mode is that UGI is transmitted on PUSCH2-1), wherein the PUCCH and the PUSCH carrying the second UCI have different priorities (fig. 9 – [0129], there are three PUSCHs with the second priority simultaneously overlapping with the PUCCH transmitting the UCI with the first priority), or the first UCI comprises first priority UCI and the second UCI comprises second priority UCI (fig. 9, [0129], a transmission of UCI with the first priority and a transmission of UCI with the second priority; that is, one UCI has the first priority UCI, the other UCI has the second priority UCI). It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in this claim and the examiner can only show one of the claimed options. Claims 8, 15, 22 are rejected similarly as claim1 noting that Fu discloses a processor, memory, and transceiver (fig. 3). Regarding claims 2, 9, 16, 23, Fu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein selecting the PUSCH without carrying the second UCI preferentially comprises any of the following: a combination of selecting the PUSCH without carrying the second UCI preferentially and selecting a PUSCH with a same priority as the PUCCH preferentially (fig. 6); or a combination of selecting the PUSCH without carrying the second UCI preferentially and selecting a PUSCH supporting multiplexing transmission of different priorities preferentially (fig. 7, 9 [0129], PUSCH 2-1 without carrying the second UCI, while having different priority of the first UCI); or a combination of selecting the PUSCH without carrying the second UCI preferentially, selecting a PUSCH with a same priority as the PUCCH preferentially, and selecting a PUSCH supporting multiplexing transmission of different priorities preferentially. It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in this claim and the examiner is only showing one of the claimed options. Regarding claim 3, 10, 17, 24, Fu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein determining the corresponding UCI transmission mode based on UCI carried on the target PUSCH comprises: transmitting the first UCI on the target PUSCH in case that the target PUSCH does not carry the second UCI (fig. 9, PUSCH 2-1); or, performing transmission according to any of the following in case that the target PUSCH carries the second UCI: dropping the second UCI and transmitting the first UCI on the target PUSCH; or, dropping a part of the second UCI, and transmitting the first UCI together with remaining part of the second UCI on the target PUSCH; or, dropping a part of the first UCI, and transmitting the second UCI together with the remaining part of the first UCI on the target PUSCH; or, transmitting the first UCI and the second UCI on the target PUSCH; or, dropping the target PUSCH; or, dropping the PUCCH. It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in this claim and the examiner is only showing one of the claimed options. Regarding claim 4, 11, 18, 25, Fu discloses the method of claim 3, wherein after dropping the target PUSCH, the method further comprises: dropping all other PUSCHs overlapping with the PUCCH in time domain resources, and transmitting the PUCCH carrying the first UCI; or, selecting another target PUSCH for carrying the first UCI from remaining PUSCHs overlapping with the PUCCH in time domain resources, and determining the corresponding UCI transmission mode based on UCI carried on the another target PUSCH (fig. 9, [0129]). It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in claim 3 and the examiner is only showing one of the claimed options (in fact, the option in this claim could be ignored as it is not selected by the examiner in claim 3). Regarding claim 5, 12, 19, 26, Fu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the first UCI and the second UCI satisfy any or any combination of the following conditions: UCI comprised in the first UCI and UCI comprised in the second UCI comprise UCI that does not support multiplexing transmission; or, the first UCI comprises hybrid automatic repeat request-ACKnowledgment (HARQ-ACK) and/or channel state information (CSI), and the second UCI comprises HARQ-ACK and/or CSI ([0145], the types of UCI may include, but are not limited to, HARQ-ACK, CSI) and/or, in case that UCIs carried on the PUCCH have different priorities, a priority of the PUCCH is high priority or a third priority; or, in case that UCIs carried on the PUSCH have different priorities, a priority of the PUSCH is high priority or a third priority, wherein the third priority is a priority type other than high priority and low priority; and/or, the multiple PUSCHs are PUSCHs unable to be transmitted simultaneously with the PUCCH. It is noted that the applicant uses selective language in this claim and the examiner is only showing one of the claimed options. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZHENSHENG ZHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1985. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 8:00am-6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Thier can be reached at 571-272-2832. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZHENSHENG ZHANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2474
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2024
Application Filed
May 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 12, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750846
INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12732984
SR FOR EH DEVICES
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726294
METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726997
Information Transmission Method and Apparatus
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12713278
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 8m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 407 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month