Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/728,882

CAIMAN RING FORCEPS - MANUAL HF ACTIVATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 14, 2024
Examiner
RHODES, NORA W
Art Unit
3794
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Aesculap AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 2m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allow Rate
47 granted / 91 resolved
-18.4% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 2m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
153
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.4%
+20.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 91 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: Line 10: “a inner part” should read –an inner part–. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 12-18, 20, and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Boudreaux, US 20210330374, herein referred to as “Boudreaux”. Regarding claim 12, Boudreaux teaches a bipolar HF instrument (Figure 5) comprising: a jaw part (Figure 5: end effector 210), a first instrument branch and a second instrument branch for grasping tissue (Figure 5: housing 232 and resilient arm 234), which are provided and configured to move away from each other when opening and toward each other when closing (Figures 14A-B); a blade actuating element for moving a mechanical blade in the jaw part for cutting tissue (Figure 5: knife trigger 251 and [0085]); and/or (every claim limitation after the preceding “and/or” is not actively claimed and thus is considered an optional feature) an HF activation element for activating an HF power supply for sealing tissue ([optional] Figure 5: RF trigger 242), the blade actuating element and/or the HF activation element being operable from two opposite sides of the bipolar HF instrument ([optional] [0086]: “Electrode activation assembly (240) includes an RF trigger (242) slidably supported on each lateral side of housing (232), ”), the HF activation element comprising an inner part which is mounted in a rocking, sliding or pivotable manner on an axis of rotation of the HF activation element in the second instrument branch orthogonal to a proximal-distal direction ([optional] Figure 6: coupling block 244 and [0086]), the inner part having a side pointing in a direction proximal to the bipolar HF instrument that has a contact element with an activation surface that contacts at least a first HF activation button during actuation of the HF activation element and activates the HF power supply ([optional] Figure 10: sliding body 246 contacts activation button 248 and [0086]), the inner part of the HF activation element comprising a first actuating wing or knob and a second actuating wing or knob ([optional] Figures 6 and 10: coupling block 244 has two sides which are considered actuating wings), the first actuating wing or knob protruding laterally on the second instrument branch ([optional] Figure 6) and the second actuating wing or knob protruding opposite the first actuating wing on the other side of the second instrument branch ([optional] Figure 6: coupling block 244 has two sides which are considered actuating wings), and the contact element comprising two adjacent cams that extend in a direction of the first HF activation button and receive the first HF activation button between the two adjacent cams without contact in a non-actuated state ([optional] Figure 10: sliding body 246 and [0086]). Regarding claim 13, Boudreaux discloses the bipolar HF instrument according to claim 12, wherein the HF activation element is proximally movable when performing sealing ([0086]: “A proximal end of sliding body (246) is directly adjacent to activation button (248) such that proximal translation of sliding body (246) triggers activation button (248). Therefore, the operator may press RF trigger (242) proximally in order to compress activation button (248). ”). Regarding claim 14, Boudreaux discloses the bipolar HF instrument according to claim 12, wherein the inner part is crossbar-shaped (Figure 10: coupling block 244 is crossbar-shaped). Regarding claim 15, Boudreaux discloses the bipolar HF instrument according to claim 12, wherein the HF activation element is provided in an open state of the bipolar HF instrument with a locking element of the HF activation element to lock an actuation of the HF activation element (Figure 6: lockout button 245 and [0088]). Regarding claim 16, Boudreaux discloses the bipolar HF instrument according to claim 12, wherein the first HF activation button is arranged in a proximal direction away from the inner part of the HF activation element (Figure 6: activation button 248 is proximal to coupling block 244) but facing the inner part of the HF activation element on a printed circuit board in the second instrument branch (Figure 6: activation button 248 is on circuit board 208 as part of housing 232). Regarding claim 17, Boudreaux discloses the bipolar HF instrument according to claim 12, wherein in the first instrument branch, a first rack and pinion gear is provided and arranged (Figure 10: teeth 228 and output pinion 256), in which an input rack is connected to the blade actuating element (Figure 10: distal rack 282 and [0117]) and an output rack is connected to the mechanical blade (Figure 10: proximal rack 226 and [0103]), wherein the blade actuating element is linearly movable proximally from a distal resting position for operating the mechanical blade (Figure 10: knife 220 and [0111]-[0112]). Regarding claim 18, Boudreaux discloses the bipolar HF instrument according to claim 17, wherein the input rack and the blade actuating element are arranged approximately on a plane of symmetry between the first instrument branch and the second instrument branch (Figures 6 and 10: distal rack 282 and knife trigger 251 are arranged approximately on a plane of symmetry between housing 232 and resilient arm 234). Regarding claim 20, Boudreaux teaches a bipolar HF instrument (Figure 5) comprising: a jaw part (Figure 5: end effector 210), a first instrument branch and a second instrument branch for grasping tissue (Figure 5: housing 232 and resilient arm 234), which are provided and configured to move away from each other when opening and toward each other when closing (Figures 14A-B); a blade actuating element for moving a mechanical blade in the jaw part for cutting tissue (Figure 5: knife trigger 251 and [0085]); and/or (every claim limitation after the preceding “and/or” is not actively claimed and thus is considered an optional feature) an HF activation element for activating an HF power supply for sealing tissue ([optional] Figure 5: RF trigger 242), the blade actuating element and/or the HF activation element being operable from two opposite sides of the bipolar HF instrument ([optional] [0086]: “Electrode activation assembly (240) includes an RF trigger (242) slidably supported on each lateral side of housing (232), ”), the HF activation element comprising an inner part mounted in a rocking, sliding or pivotable manner on an axis of rotation of the HF activation element in the second instrument branch orthogonal to a proximal-distal direction ([optional] Figure 6: coupling block 244 and [0086]), the inner part having a side pointing in a direction proximal to the bipolar HF instrument that has a contact element with an activation surface that contacts at least a first HF activation button during actuation of the HF activation element and activates the HF power supply ([optional] Figure 10: sliding body 246 contacts activation button 248 and [0086]), the inner part of the HF activation element comprising a first actuating wing or knob and a second actuating wing or knob ([optional] Figures 6 and 10: coupling block 244 has two sides which are considered actuating wings), the first actuating wing or knob protruding laterally on the second instrument branch and the second actuating wing or knob protruding opposite the first actuating wing on the other side of the second instrument branch ([optional] Figure 6), and a second HF activation button being provided and arranged next to the first HF activation button parallel to the inner part of the HF activation element ([optional]). Regarding claim 22, Boudreaux teaches a bipolar HF instrument (Figure 5) comprising: a jaw part (Figure 5: end effector 210), a first instrument branch and a second instrument branch for grasping tissue (Figure 5: housing 232 and resilient arm 234), which are provided and configured to move away from each other when opening and toward each other when closing (Figures 14A-B); a blade actuating element for moving a mechanical blade in the jaw part for cutting tissue (Figure 5: knife trigger 251 and [0085]); and/or an (every claim limitation after the preceding “and/or” is not actively claimed and thus is considered an optional feature) an HF activation element for activating an HF power supply for sealing tissue ([optional] Figure 5: RF trigger 242), the blade actuating element and/or the HF activation element being operable from two opposite sides of the bipolar HF instrument ([optional] [0086]: “Electrode activation assembly (240) includes an RF trigger (242) slidably supported on each lateral side of housing (232), ”), and the HF activation element being configured to activate the HF power supply after a first tap activation and switches off the HF power supply automatically ([optional] [0086]: “RF trigger (242), coupling block (244), and/or sliding body (246) may be biased toward a position such that activation button (248) is not activated.”) or stops the HF power supply manually after a second tap activation of the HF activation element. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 19, 21, and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Boudreaux in view of Cummings, US 20200015881, herein referred to as “Cummings”. Regarding claims 19, 21, and 23, Boudreaux discloses the bipolar HF instrument according to claims 12, 20, and 22, but does not explicitly disclose a bipolar HF instrument further comprising a latching device for achieving a latched-in state with the first instrument branch and the second instrument branch closed. However, Cummings teaches a bipolar HF instrument (Figure 1) further comprising a latching device for achieving a latched-in state with the first instrument branch and the second instrument branch closed (Figure 12: latch assembly 348 and [0079]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify the bipolar HF instrument disclosed by Boudreaux so that it includes a latching device for achieving a latched-in state with the first instrument branch and the second instrument branch closed as taught by Cummings to ensure that the device stays closed (Cummings [0079]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Nora W Rhodes whose telephone number is (571)272-8126. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joanne Rodden can be reached on 3032974276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /N.W.R./Examiner, Art Unit 3794 /SEAN W COLLINS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 14, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588942
CONTINUOUS ROTATION OF A SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582289
ENHANCED VISION IN ELECTROSURGERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569138
Methods And Systems For Analyzing Surgical Smoke Using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564415
FORCEPS MOTION TRANSFER ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558144
WAVEFORM GENERATOR AND CONTROL FOR SELECTIVE CELL ABLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+30.3%)
4y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 91 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month