Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/729,335

ELECTRONIC DOSIMETER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 16, 2024
Examiner
KEFAYATI, SOORENA
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Chiyoda Technol Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
330 granted / 397 resolved
+15.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
429
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 397 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. Claim Objections Claims 1-2 are objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 1, limitation “, characterized by comprising” should be changed to “, comprising:” in order to correct narrative claim language. Regarding claim 2, limitation “characterized by further comprising” should be changed to “further comprising:” in order to correct narrative claim language. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nelson (U.S. 2017/0248703). Regarding claim 1: Nelson discloses an electronic dosimeter, characterized by comprising a communication unit (Fig. 2, 255) that is mounted on the electronic dosimeter and that continuously and in one way transmits, by an advertising signal via Bluetooth ([0034], communication using Bluetooth), radiation dose data measured by a radiation detection unit mounted on the electronic dosimeter ([0021], signals transmitted wirelessly; [0024], signals regarding dose exposure generated). Regarding claim 2: Nelson discloses he electronic dosimeter according to claim 1, characterized by further comprising a control unit (Fig. 2, 245 and 225) that detects that the electronic dosimeter is not being worn on a body by an acceleration sensor ([0024], acceleration sensor) and/or a gyro sensor mounted on the electronic dosimeter, and, in a case in which the electronic dosimeter is judged to not have been worn for a predetermined period, stops transmission of the advertising signal or stops supply of power to the radiation detection unit ([0024], detecting motion from user; [0037], standby mode or turned off when not worn after a certain period). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SOORENA KEFAYATI whose telephone number is (469)295-9078. The examiner can normally be reached M to F, 7:30 am to 4:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Makiya can be reached at 571-272-2273. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.K./Examiner, Art Unit 2884 /DAVID J MAKIYA/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12582365
APPARATUS AND METHOD OF ENHANCING COMFORTABILITY OF MAMMOGRAM IMAGING AND PROCEDURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584536
ANTI-VIBRATION DAMPING SYSTEM FOR A CARBON FIBER C-ARM MOUNTED ON A MOBILE BASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569215
IMAGING MANAGEMENT DEVICE, METHOD FOR OPERATING IMAGING MANAGEMENT DEVICE, AND OPERATION PROGRAM FOR IMAGING MANAGEMENT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12569213
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564333
SETTING DEVICE, SETTING METHOD, AND SETTING PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.1%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 397 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month