Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/729,540

METHOD FOR ENCODING AND DECODING DATA

Non-Final OA §101§112
Filed
Sep 10, 2024
Priority
Jan 27, 2022 — DE 10 2022 200 893.6 +1 more
Examiner
SUN, SCOTT C
Art Unit
2181
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
577 granted / 655 resolved
+33.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
673
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 655 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 19 and 20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 1/5/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 11-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 recites “the first encoding rule” and “the second encoding rule”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Examiner notes that “the first predefined encoding rule” and “the second predefined encoding rule” is assumed. To advance prosecution, the remaining office action is based on this assumption. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. The claim(s) recite(s) various steps and rules to encode data, including “selecting a suitable encoding rule”, “first encoding rule”, “second encoding rule”, “third encoding rule”, “omitting all binary positions…”, “extending a binary number…” simply manipulate a set of binary data, and are mathematical and/or logical steps that can be performed by the human mind, with the assistance of pen and paper. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because “sensors”, “transmitter”, “receiver”, and “automation system” are generic computer elements. These generic elements do not add a meaningful limitation to the abstract idea because they amount to simply implementing the abstract idea on a computer. The claim(s) does/do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because the steps of “receiving” and “transmitting” data merely move data using generic computer elements such as memory and related circuitry. These are well-understood, routine, conventional computer functions as recognized by the court decisions listed in MPEP § 2106.05(d) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yin (US 20240089608 A1) discloses data encoding algorithms, including selecting a range of data to encode. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT C SUN whose telephone number is (571)272-2675. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 12-8:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Idriss Alrobaye can be reached at (571) 270-1023. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SCOTT C SUN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2181
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596496
HBM BASED MEMORY LOOKUP ENGINE FOR DEEP LEARNING ACCELERATOR
1y 9m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12567457
MEMORY DEVICES AND SYSTEMS CONFIGURED TO COMMUNICATE A DELAY SIGNAL AND METHODS FOR OPERATING THE SAME
1y 9m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12561058
DYNAMIC MODIFICATION OF INPUT/OUTPUT REQUESTS FOR RAID DEVICES
2y 0m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12561140
BITWIDTH RESPONSIVE PROCESS OPERATIONS
1y 10m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12536086
System, Method And Apparatus For High Level Microarchitecture Event Performance Monitoring Using Fixed Counters
4y 1m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.5%)
2y 5m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 655 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month