Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/729,742

NUMERICAL CONTROL DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 17, 2024
Priority
Mar 15, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022011740
Examiner
PAN, YUHUI R
Art Unit
2116
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
FANUC Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
514 granted / 617 resolved
+28.3% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
637
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.6%
+14.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 617 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 – 5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by McCormick et al. US 5,349,337 (hereinafter McCormick). Regarding claim 1, McCormick teaches: a numerical control device comprising: a deep-hole drilling execution unit configured to carry out deep hole drilling by repeatedly performing a cutting operation of causing a cutting tool to cut into a workpiece while rotating the cutting tool and a retraction operation of retracting the cutting tool while rotating the cutting tool (C5, L47-66 - - peck cycle); and a chip removal time calculation unit configured to calculate a chip removal time in accordance with a position of the cutting tool at an end of each cutting in the cutting operation (C5, L47-66 - - full retract cycles, bit is fully retracted from the drill hole to clear chips from the drill hole; thus the retraction distance is known, the retraction time can be calculated based on the retraction distance and retraction speed; C4, L9-11 - - the elapsed drill time which including the time of retract cycles is programmed into control computer, thus the retract time is calculated), wherein the deep-hole drilling execution unit performs the retraction operation for the chip removal time (C5, L47-66 - - retract cycle to clear chips from the drill hole). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YUHUI R PAN whose telephone number is (571)272-9872. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Lo can be reached at (571) 272-9774. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YUHUI R PAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2116
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746724
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734746
TECHNIQUES FOR GENERATING COMPOSITE STRUCTURES THAT COMBINE METAL AND POLYMER COMPOSITIONS
3y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734755
Method of Monitoring and Influencing an Additive Layer Manufacturing Process
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728599
IMPROVED ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING MONITORING METHOD AND SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12717980
INTERIOR-LAYOUT ASSISTANCE METHOD, INTERIOR-LAYOUT ASSISTANCE SYSTEM, AND PROGRAM
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.1%)
2y 7m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 617 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month