Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/730,109

VEHICLE CONTROL APPARATUS AND SUSPENSION SYSTEM

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 18, 2024
Examiner
TRAN, LONG T
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hitachi Astemo, Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
1114 granted / 1343 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1371
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§102
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1343 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1 – 2, 4 – 7 remain pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 – 2, 4 – 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hirao et al. (US 2020/023705). Regarding Claim 1: Hirao et al. teaches a vehicle control apparatus (10) mounted on a vehicle, the vehicle including an actuator apparatus (7) provided between a vehicle body (1) and a wheel (2) of a vehicle and configured to change a force for suppressing a relative displacement (via 4, 5, 6) between the vehicle body and the wheel, a road surface displacement detection portion (8) configured to detect road surface displacement information in a traveling direction of the vehicle, and a vehicle speed information output portion (3) configured to output vehicle speed information of the vehicle, the vehicle control apparatus being configured to control the actuator apparatus, the vehicle control apparatus comprising: a road surface displacement information reception portion (11) configured to receive an input of the road surface displacement information; a vehicle speed information reception portion (12) configured to receive an input of the vehicle speed information; and a memory (10a) configured to record the input road surface displacement information, wherein the vehicle control apparatus records the road surface displacement information into the memory for each predetermined distance by which the vehicle moves based on the vehicle speed information and a sampling time (paragraph 0055) and also determines wheel position road surface displacement information (via 9) corresponding to a position of the wheel based on the road surface displacement information recorded in the memory, and outputs an actuator instruction value for causing the actuator apparatus to perform a predetermined operation according to the wheel position road surface displacement information (via 26, and see paragraph 0019), and wherein the predetermined distance based on which the road surface displacement information is recorded into the memory can be changed to be a shorter interval when a road surface is highly uneven compared to when the road surface is less uneven (Figs 5 – 6, paragraphs 0045 – 0061). Regarding Claim 2: Hirao et al. teaches the predetermined distance based on which the road surface displacement information is recorded into the memory is changed according to an environment surrounding the vehicle (Figs 2 – 3). Regarding Claim 6: Hirao et al. teaches the road surface displacement information for each predetermined distance by which the vehicle moves is recorded into the memory when a movement speed of the vehicle is equal to or lower than a predetermined speed (Figs 5 – 6). Regarding Claim 7: See the rejection of Claim 1 above. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4 – 5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed December 17, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. On Page 4 of the Remarks, the Applicant argues that Hirao et al. does not teach the vehicle control apparatus records the road surface displacement information into the memory for each predetermined distance by which the vehicle moves based on the vehicle speed information and a sampling time.” The Examiner disagrees and maintains the rejection because Hirao et al. teaches in paragraph 0055 a camera 8 that conducts a simulation of running on the road surface twenty times as fast as real time corresponding to a predetermined time (corresponding to one running event during a sampling time per which the road surface data is updated). Paragraph 0022 of Hirao et al. describes a memory 10A that stores the road surface preview information ahead of the vehicle that is imaged by the camera device 8 in an updatable manner. The camera device of Hirao et al. is a well known recording medium, and the memory and controller described by Hirao et al. uses speed detected, recorded images, real time sampling of the road condition, to further simulate an upcoming or preview road characteristic, which reads on the limitation of the claim. On Pages 6 and 7 of the Remarks, the Applicant argues that Hirao et al. does not teach the limitation requiring “the predetermined distance based on which the road surface displacement information is recorded into the memory can be changed to be a shorter interval when a road surface is highly uneven compared to when the road surface is less uneven.” The Examiner disagrees and maintains the rejection. Hirao et al. describes in paragraph 0039 the camera device can detect the distance. Memory 10A is used to record the memory. Figs 5 – 6, paragraphs 0045 – 0061 of Hirao et al. further describe the process of changing and updated the memory of the road surface in real time, of which Fig 5 specially shows the changing time periods based on vehicle speed and road waviness conditions. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LONG T TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1899. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 9:00 - 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Logan Kraft can be reached at 571-270-5065. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LONG T TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 18, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 09, 2025
Interview Requested
Dec 12, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 17, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 09, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601315
CARBURETED ENGINE HAVING AN ADJUSTABLE FUEL TO AIR RATIO
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600407
STEERING CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600405
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE, VEHICLE CONTROL PROGRAM, AND VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594989
COMPENSATION SYSTEM FOR COMPENSATING TRAILER SWAY OF A VEHICLE TRAILER OF A TOWING VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594936
VEHICLE CONTROL APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+13.8%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1343 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month