Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/730,275

Preparation assemblage for coating seed

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 18, 2024
Priority
Jan 21, 2022 — DE 10 2022 000 218.3 +1 more
Examiner
HOLLOMAN, NANNETTE
Art Unit
1612
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Instant Seed GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
478 granted / 788 resolved
+0.7% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
810
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
81.1%
+41.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 788 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 22-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 22 recites the phrase “component A) has a temperature of at most 60°C” , claim 35 recites “component A has a temperature of at most 50°C”, and claim 36 recites “component A has a temperature of at most 40°C” and it is not clear what the temperature is referring to. Therefore, the claim is indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 22-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jessop (WO 2012/143685, disclosed by applicant). Jessop discloses a method of manufacturing a seed coating comprising adding a wax having a melting point of ≥50°C; heating the wax to form a liquid; and adding one or more additives for enhancing seedling vigour and/or seedling growth selected from one or more inorganic additives and/or one or more live biological agents (reference claim 9 and 18). Jessop discloses the wax includes castor wax, carnauba wax, beeswax, montan wax, Chinese wax, castor wax, ouricury wax and rice bran wax (p.3, lines 30-36). Jessop discloses additives include rhizobial symbionts (p. 5, line 9). Jessop discloses the coating method includes antifreeze compounds, surfactants, emulsifying agent thickeners or binders (p. 6). Jessop discloses peat wax with a particle size less that 10 micron (p. 4, lines 2-8). Jessop discloses seeds of rice, wheat, rye, oat, corn and barley (reference claim 24). Jessop is silent in regard to microplastics. Jessop discloses a seed coating composition in the form of particles that comprises a wax and seed an a least one additive form one or more inorganic additives and/or one or more live biological agent, which would meet the limitation of a kit (reference claim 1). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NANNETTE HOLLOMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5231. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sahana S. Kaup can be reached at 571-272-6897. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NANNETTE HOLLOMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678382
WATER-IN-OIL TYPE EMULSIFIED SOLID COSMETIC MATERIAL
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673030
PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR BURN TREATMENT COMPRISING TMD NANOSHEETS AS AN ACTIVE INGREDIENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673137
THERAPEUTIC PUTTIES CONTAINING ADDITIVES INCLUDING PROCESSED HUMAN BLOOD PLASMA
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673058
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO INCREASE HAIR GROWTH AND/OR PREVENT HAIR LOSS
11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12653765
SUNSCREEN COSMETIC
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+22.9%)
3y 0m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 788 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month