Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/731,051

Recommendation And Update Of Network Policies

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 31, 2024
Examiner
MANIWANG, JOSEPH R
Art Unit
2441
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Cisco Technology Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
376 granted / 441 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
458
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§103
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 441 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/11/2026 has been entered. Claims 14 and 20 are amended. Claims 1, 3-5, and 11-20 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant’s claim amendments and arguments, see Remarks, filed 03/11/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 14-19 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as detailed below. Claim Objections Claim 14 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 14 recites “generate one or more policy update recommendations based on the output” in line 20, which is redundant to the same limitation previously recited in line 12. Examiner suggests amending to remove the “generate” limitation in line 20, and move the “wherein” clause in line 21 directly after the “generate” limitation in line 12. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 14-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 14 recites the limitation "the generated policy update recommendation" in 15. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim, as while the claim previously recites “one or more policy update recommendations” (i.e., plural, line 12) and “at least one of the generated policy update recommendations” (i.e., plural, line 13), the claim does not recite a particular one (i.e., singular) of the policy update recommendations, which would be required for the reference to “the generated policy update recommendation” as claimed. Claims 15-19 are rejected as depending from claim 14 and under the same rationale. Examiner suggest the amendment “the at least one of the generated policy update recommendations”. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3-5, 11-13, and 20 are allowed. Examiner’s statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter is stated in the Final Rejection mailed 12/18/2025. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH R MANIWANG whose telephone number is (571)270-7257. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30AM - 4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kamal B. Divecha can be reached at (571) 272-5863. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH R MANIWANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2441
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 31, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 12, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 14, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Jan 08, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 08, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603811
AUTO-HEALING CONTROL IN CONSIDERATION OF TYPE OF NETWORK PROBLEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596637
OPTIMZING SYNTHETIC TESTS ACROSS CLOUD, ENTERPRISE, AND USER AGENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587438
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR NETWORK ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581365
NETWORK LOAD BALANCING BASED ON DEVICE TYPE OR HISTORY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574300
FEDERATED LEARNING GROUP PROCESSING METHOD, DEVICE AND FUNCTIONAL ENTITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 441 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month