Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/731,247

DUAL-MOTOR RECLINER CHAIR, LOVE SEAT, OR SOFA

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 01, 2024
Examiner
THOMPSON, JESSICA KATHRYN
Art Unit
3636
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Motomotion China Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
11 granted / 14 resolved
+26.6% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
24
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 14 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-16 are pending. Claims 1-16 have been examined. Claim Objections Claim 1-5, and 9-13 objected to because of the following informalities: The claims alternate between the phrases “position/orientation/state” (as in claims 1, 2, 4, etc) and “position, state, or orientation” (as in claim 3, 5, etc) – note additionally the ordering of the words changes also (for example, from “position/orientation/state” to “position/state/orientation”); the claims should be amended to only use one of these phrases for consistency and clarity. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 4, 6, 12 and 14 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 4 is indefinite as in lines 3-4 it recites “the entire chair” which lacks proper antecedent basis. Additionally, it is noted that claim 1, and line 3 of claim 4 recite the position of the “furniture piece”, however in the final line of claim 4, the claim then recites the position of “said chair”. It is unclear if the position of “said chair” is different than that of the “furniture piece.” Similarly claim 12 is indefinite for the same reasons as claim 4. Claim 6 and 14 recites the limitation "said chair framework", there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(2) as being anticipated by Chih Hsiung Liu (US 12082698). As concerns claim 1, Liu teaches a powered furniture piece, comprising: a framework (Liu, fig. 1: 104); a pair of oppositely disposed seat plates (Liu, fig. 3: 174), mounted upon said framework (Liu, fig. 1: 104), for mounting a seat (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) thereon; a pair of oppositely disposed footrest mounting brackets (Liu, fig. 12: 238 and 250), operatively connected to said pair of oppositely disposed seat plates (Liu, fig. 3: 174), for mounting a footrest (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) thereon; a pair of oppositely disposed backrest mounting brackets (Liu, fig. 1: 162), operatively connected to said pair of oppositely disposed seat plates (Liu, fig. 3: 174), for mounting a backrest (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) thereon; and a pair of linear actuators (Liu. Fig. 3: 108 and 110) operatively connected to said framework (Liu, fig. 1: 104) and said seat (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) such that when a first one of said pair of linear actuators (Liu. Fig. 3: 108) is extended (Liu, fig. column 11, lines 17-19), while a second one of said pair of linear actuators (Liu. Fig. 3: 110) is partially extended (Liu, column 11, line 44), said furniture piece is disposed in a SEATED position/orientation/state (Liu, shown in fig. 10) wherein said seat (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) is disposed within a substantially horizontal plane (Liu, column 13, lines 7-8), said footrest (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) is retracted (Liu, column 13, lines 11-13), and said backrest is disposed upright (Liu, column 13, lines 9-10). As concerns claim 2, Liu teaches wherein: when said second one of said pair of linear actuators (Liu. Fig. 3: 110) is retracted (Liu, column 10, lines 21-23), said furniture piece is disposed at a TV position/orientation/state (Liu, shown in fig. 12), wherein said seat is disposed within a substantially horizontal plane (Liu, column 13, lines 7-8), said footrest is extended (Liu, shown in fig. 12), and said backrest is disposed upright (Liu, column 13, lines 9-10). As concerns claim 3, Liu teaches wherein: when said second one of said pair of linear actuators (Liu. Fig. 3: 110) is retracted (Liu, column 10, lines 21-23) further, said furniture piece is disposed at a ZERO-GRAVITY position, state, or orientation (Liu, shown in fig. 13) wherein said seat is reclined (Liu, shown in fig. 1) with a rear portion of said seat being disposed at an elevation which is lower than a front portion of said seat, and wherein said footrest is disposed at a higher elevation than that of said seat (Liu, column 2, lines 26-35). As concerns claim 4, Liu teaches wherein: when said second one of said pair of linear actuators (Liu. Fig. 3: 110) is extended (Liu, column 11, line 44), said furniture piece is disposed at a LIFT position/orientation/state (Liu, shown in fig. 11) wherein the entire chair (Liu, fig. 1: 100), comprising said footrest (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23), said seat (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23), and said backrest (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23), is elevated to an elevational level which is significantly above (Liu, column 11, lines 17-25) where said chair (Liu, fig. 1: 100) is disposed when said chair (Liu, fig. 1: 100) is disposed at said SEATED position/state/orientation (Liu, shown in fig. 10). As concerns claim 5, Liu teaches wherein: when said first one of said pair of linear actuators (Liu. Fig. 3: 108) is retracted (Liu, column 11, lines 32-33), said backrest of said furniture piece is disposed at a RECLINED position, orientation, or state (Liu, shown in fig. 1). As concerns claim 6, Liu teaches wherein: said first and second linear actuators (Liu. Fig. 3: 108 and 110) are mounted upon said chair framework (Liu, fig. 1: 104) so as to be disposed in opposite orientations (Liu, shown in fig. 1). As concerns claim 7, Liu teaches wherein: said pair of oppositely disposed footrest mounting brackets (Liu, fig. 12: 238 and 250) are operatively connected to said pair of oppositely disposed seat plates (Liu, fig. 3: 174) by a plurality of linkage members (Liu, fig. 1: 106). As concerns claim 8, Liu teaches wherein: said furniture piece is selected from the group comprising a chair, a love seat, and a sofa (Liu, column 1, lines 15-17). As concerns claim 9, Liu teaches A powered furniture piece, comprising: a framework (Liu, fig. 1: 104); a pair of oppositely disposed seat plates (Liu, fig. 3: 174), mounted upon said framework (Liu, fig. 1: 104), for mounting a seat (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) thereon; a pair of oppositely disposed footrest mounting brackets (Liu, fig. 12: 238 and 250), operatively connected to said pair of oppositely disposed seat plates (Liu, fig. 3: 174), for mounting a footrest (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) thereon; a pair of oppositely disposed backrest mounting brackets (Liu, fig. 1: 162), operatively connected to said pair of oppositely disposed seat plates (Liu, fig. 3: 174), for mounting a backrest (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) thereon; and a pair of linear actuators (Liu. Fig. 3: 108 and 110) operatively connected to said framework (Liu, fig. 1: 104) and said seat (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) such that when said pair of linear actuators (Liu. Fig. 3: 108 and 110) are actuated, said furniture piece can attain different positions/orientations/states (Liu, column 2, line 67 through column 3, lines 1-4), comprising a SEATED position/orientation/state (Liu, shown in fig. 10), a TV position/orientation/state (Liu, shown in fig. 12), a ZERO- GRAVITY position/orientation/state (Liu, shown in fig. 13), a LIFT position/orientation/state (Liu, shown in fig. 11), and a backrest (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) RECLINED position/orientation/state (Liu, shown in fig. 1). As concerns claim 10, Liu teaches wherein: when said furniture piece is disposed at said SEATED position, orientation, or state, (Liu, shown in fig. 10) said seat (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) is disposed within a substantially horizontal plane (Liu, column 13, lines 7-8), said footrest is retracted (Liu, column 13, lines 11-13), and said backrest is disposed upright (Liu, column 13, lines 9-10). As concerns claim 11, Liu teaches wherein: when said furniture piece is disposed at said ZERO-GRAVITY position/state/orientation (Liu, shown in fig. 13), said seat is reclined with a rear portion of said seat being disposed at an elevation which is lower than a front portion of said seat, and wherein said footrest is disposed at a higher elevation than that of said seat (Liu, column 2, lines 26-35). As concerns claim 12, Liu teaches wherein: when said furniture piece is disposed at said LIFT position, state, or orientation (Liu, shown in fig. 11), the entire chair (Liu, fig. 1: 100), comprising said footrest (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23), said seat (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23), and said backrest (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23), is elevated to an elevational level which is significantly above (Liu, column 11, lines 17-25) where said chair (Liu, fig. 1: 100) is disposed when said chair (Liu, fig. 1: 100) is disposed at said SEATED position, state, or orientation (Liu, shown in fig. 10). As concerns claim 13, Liu teaches wherein: when said backrest (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) of said furniture piece is disposed at said RECLINED position/orientation/state (Liu, shown in fig. 1), said backrest (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) is disposed at a reclined position/state/orientation (Liu, shown in fig. 1) relative to an upright position (Liu, column 13, lines 9-10). As concerns claim 14, Liu teaches wherein: said pair of linear actuators (Liu. Fig. 3: 108 and 110) are mounted upon said chair framework (Liu, fig. 1: 104) so as to be disposed in opposite orientations (Liu, shown in fig. 1). As concerns claim 15, Liu teaches wherein: said at least one footrest mounting bracket (Liu, fig. 12: 238 and 250) is operatively connected to said seat (Liu, column 2, lines 18-23) by a plurality of linkage members (Liu, fig. 1: 106). As concerns claim 16, Liu teaches wherein: said furniture piece is selected from the group comprising a chair, a love seat, and a sofa (Liu, column 1, lines 15-17). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSICA K THOMPSON whose telephone number is (571)272-3620. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30-5:00 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Dunn can be reached at 571-272-6670. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JESSICA K THOMPSON Examiner Art Unit 3636 /DAVID R DUNN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3636
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 01, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600268
VEHICLE SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583371
SLIDING INTERLOCKING RECLINING SEAT STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12552294
MOTOR VEHICLE SEAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12520944
TRAVELING SUPPORT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12522119
DEPLOYABLE TRAY TABLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 14 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month