Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/731,683

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DELIVERING SHORT MESSAGE SERVICE MESSAGES USING A SHORT MESSAGE SERVICE CENTER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 03, 2024
Examiner
TON, DANG T
Art Unit
4100
Tech Center
4100
Assignee
Verizon Communications Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
533 granted / 602 resolved
+28.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+1.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
642
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 602 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1,2,5,8,9,12,15,16,and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hua et al. (2020/0204962) in view of Bansal et al. (2016/0381710). For independent claim 1, Hua et al. (2020/0204962) discloses a system comprising: a method, comprising: receiving, by a device, a short message service (SMS) message for delivery to a user equipment (UE) ( See details of box 620 in figure 6); attempting, by the device, an SMS message delivery to the UE via a first network; determining, by the device, that the SMS message delivery via the first network has failed ( See box 630 in figure 6); attempting, by the device, the SMS message delivery via a second network; determining, by the device, that the SMS message delivery via the second network is successful ( See paragraphs 0019 lines 1-20, 0023 lines 1-25 and 0017 lines 1-14) ; receiving, by the device, a subsequent SMS message for delivery to the UE; and delivering, by the device and based on the indicator, the subsequent SMS message to the UE using the second network( See paragraphs 0019 lines 1-20, 0023 lines 1-25 and 0017 lines 1-14); and a non-transitory computer-readable medium ( See boxes 214 and 206 in figure 2). For independent claim 1, Hua et al. (2020/0204962) discloses all the subject matter of the claimed invention with the exception of setting, by the device, an indicator to skip the first network for any subsequent SMS messages for the UE in a communications network. Bansal et al. from the same or similar fields of endeavor teaches a provision of setting, by the device, an indicator to skip the first network for any subsequent SMS messages for the UE ( See paragraph 0087 lines 1-11). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use setting, by the device, an indicator to skip the first network for any subsequent SMS messages for the UE as taught by Bansal et al. (2016/0381710) in the communications network of Hua et al. (2020/0204962) for the purpose of setting, by the device, an indicator to skip the first network for any subsequent SMS messages for the UE. For independent claims 8 and 15 are rejected for the same reasons as claim 1. For dependent claim 5, Hue et al. also discloses receiving, by the device, an indication of a UE registration status, wherein the UE registration status indicates whether the UE is registered with the first network or the second network; and storing, by the device, the UE registration status as part of local registration data( See paragraph 0087 lines 1-11). For dependent claims 2,9, and 16, Hua et al. (2020/0204962) in view of Bansal et al. (2016/0381710) disclose all the subject matter of the claimed invention with the exception of wherein the device is a short message service center (SMSC), the first network is associated with Internet Protocol multimedia subsystem (IMS), and the second network is associated with Global System for Mobile communication (GSM). However, wherein the device is a short message service center (SMSC), the first network is associated with Internet Protocol multimedia subsystem (IMS), and the second network is associated with Global System for Mobile communication (GSM) are well-known in the art. Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use wherein the device is a short message service center (SMSC), the first network is associated with Internet Protocol multimedia subsystem (IMS), and the second network is associated with Global System for Mobile communication (GSM) as well-known in the art in the communications network of Hua et al. (2020/0204962) in view of Bansal et al. (2016/0381710) for the purpose of using wherein the device is a short message service center (SMSC), the first network is associated with Internet Protocol multimedia subsystem (IMS), and the second network is associated with Global System for Mobile communication (GSM). Claims 3,4,6,7,10,11,13,14,17,18,and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hirai (2013/0136131) is cited to show a system which is considered pertinent to the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANG T TON whose telephone number is (571)272-3171. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 5:30 AM to 3:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ayaz Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-3795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANG T TON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476 /D.T.T/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707528
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UPDATING RNA DURING SDT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701087
SWITCH AND SCHEDULING METHOD FOR SWITCH
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12677333
WIRELESS DEVICE CONNECTION ESTABLISHMENT AND CONFIRMATION WITH ENHANCED VIRTUAL ASSISTANT FUNCTIONS
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669949
SERVICE LEVEL PORT OVERSUBSCRIPTION
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665654
TECHNIQUES FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNAL STRENGTH INDICATION AND BEAM-SPECIFIC MEASUREMENT THRESHOLD
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+1.1%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 602 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month