Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/732,799

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING OCCUPANCY IN A ROOM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 04, 2024
Examiner
MOORE, WHITNEY
Art Unit
3646
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Carrier Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1008 granted / 1139 resolved
+36.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1177
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
§103
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§102
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1139 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7 and 11-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lagace et al. (Lagace, US PGPub 2021/0321222). Referring to Claim 1, Lagace teaches a detection unit (Fig. 3 #212; [0122]), and a control unit (Fig. 3 #330; [0122]) communicatively connected with the detection unit, the control unit comprising one or more processors configured to: cause, via the detection unit, transmission of radar signals within the room over a predefined period of time (Fig. 3 #310; [0122]); receive, via the detection unit, reflected signals corresponding to the transmitted radar signals, the reflected signals being indicative of information associated with the room (Fig. 3 #320; [0122]); determine, based on the reflected signals, presence of one or more occupants within the room (Fig. 1 #160; [0106-0108]); and in response to determining presence of the one or more occupants within the room, determine one or more of: an activity associated with the one or more occupants within the room ([0106-0108]), preferences associated with usage of the room by the one or more occupants within the room ([0112]), and a visualization map associated with the room; see abstract, [0002] and [0153]. Referring to Claims 2 and 12, Lagace teaches wherein the detection unit comprises a first ultra-wide band (UWB) radar and a second UWB radar, wherein the first UWB radar is configured to transmit radar signals within the room, and wherein the second UWB radar is configured to transmit the radar signals through wall structures within the room, thereby transmitting the radar signals throughout the room; [0134] and [0165]. Referring to Claims 3 and 13, Lagace teaches wherein the information associated with the room comprises one or more of: occupant activity parameters related to activities of the one or more occupants within the room, occupant location parameters related to respective location of the one or more occupants within the room, and occupant vital parameters indicative of an identification of the one or more occupants within the room and vital sign information associated with the one or more occupants within the room; [0108-0112]. Referring to Claims 4 and 14, Lagace teaches wherein to determine presence of the one or more occupants, the one or more processors are configured to: compare one or more of frequency values, phase values, and amplitude values of the transmitted radar signals with one or more of frequency values, phase values, and amplitude values associated with the received reflected signals, respectively; detect a change in the one or more of frequency values, phase values, and amplitude values of the reflected signals compared to the transmitted radar signals; and in response to detecting the change, determine presence of the one or more occupants within the room; [0108] and [0242]. Referring to Claims 5 and 15, Lagace teaches wherein to determine the activity associated with the one or more occupants within the room, the one or more processors are configured to: extract the occupant activity parameters based on the reflected signals; and determine an activity of the one or more occupants within the room based on the occupant activity parameters, wherein the activity of the one or more occupants comprises one or more of sleeping, standing, sitting, exercising, and walking; [0194]. Referring to Claims 6 and 16, Lagace teaches wherein the one or more processors are configured to: extract the occupant vital parameters based on the reflected signals; determine, based on the occupant vital parameters, a health status associated with the one or more occupants within the room, wherein the health status comprises information related to sleep quality, sleep time, sleep stage, stress level, and health risks associated with the one or more occupants; and cause the health status to be displayed on a user interface associated with one or more of: the control unit, a user device of the one or more occupants, and a user device of one or more administrators associated with the room; [0201-0202] and [0230]. Referring to Claims 7 and 17, Lagace teaches wherein the one or more processors are configured to: upon determining the health status to comprise information related to health risks, transmit an alert notification to one or more of a user device of the one or more occupants, and the user device of one or more administrators associated with the room; [0137-0138], [0166] and [0197]. Referring to Claim 8 and 18, Lagace teaches wherein to determine the preferences associated with the one or more occupants within the room, the one or more processors are configured to: extract the occupant activity parameters and the occupant location parameters based on the reflected signals; detect one or more surrounding parameters associated with the room, the one or more surrounding parameters being associated with a status of surroundings of the one or more occupants; and determine the preferences associated with a usage of the room based on the occupant activity parameters, the occupant location parameters, and the one or more surrounding parameters; [0137-0138], [0166] and [0197]. Referring to Claims 9 and 19, Lagace teaches wherein the one or more processors are configured to: perform a control action based on the preferences associated with the one or more occupants, wherein the control action comprises adjusting a status of surroundings of the occupant, wherein the status of surroundings comprises one or more of temperature status, light status, usage of one or more room areas, and stationary object status within the room; [0137-0138], [0166] and [0197]. Referring to Claim 11, Lagace teaches causing, via a detection unit, transmission of radar signals within the room over a predefined period of time; receiving, via the detection unit, reflected signals corresponding to the transmitted radar signals, the reflected signals being indicative of information associated with the room; determining, based on the reflected signals, presence of one or more occupants within the room; and in response to determining presence of the one or more occupants within the room, determining one or more of: an activity associated with the one or more occupants within the room, preferences associated with usage of the room by the one or more occupants within the room, and a visualization map associated with the room; see citations of Claim 1 above. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 10 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lagace in view Gillian et al. (Gillian, US PGPub 2017/0097413). Referring to Claims 10 and 20, Lagace teaches wherein to determine the visualization map associated with the room, the one or more processors are configured to: extract, based on reflected signals, the information associated with the room;, but does not explicitly disclose nor limit generate a virtual model of the room based on a pre-stored configuration of the room and the information associated with the room, the virtual model comprising a representation of the occupant within the room; and display the virtual model on one or more of a user interface associated with the one or more occupants and a user interface of an administrator associated with the room. However, Gillian teaches to determine the visualization map associated with the room, the one or more processors are configured to: extract, based on reflected signals, the information associated with the room; generate a virtual model of the room based on a pre-stored configuration of the room and the information associated with the room, the virtual model comprising a representation of the occupant within the room; and display the virtual model on one or more of a user interface associated with the one or more occupants and a user interface of an administrator associated with the room; [0083-0084] and [0122]. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to modify Lagace with the virtual modeling as taught by Gillian so as to provide a library of models to enable the device to learn and remember spaces. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WHITNEY T MOORE whose telephone number is (571)270-3338. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday from 7am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jack Keith can be reached at (571) 272-6878. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WHITNEY MOORE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3646
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 04, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601852
PRESENCE DETECTION DEVICE WITH A RADIO ANTENNA, FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597941
DELAY CALIBRATION CIRCUIT AND METHOD, ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTER, RADAR SENSOR, AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591034
AIRFIELD MULTILATERATION SYSTEM WITH PRIVATE 5G CELLULAR NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580309
CALIBRATION OF MULTI-ELEMENT ANTENNAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571873
ANGLE OF ARRIVAL DATA ACQUISITION METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE SUPPORTING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1139 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month