Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/732,928

CERAMIC SUBSTRATE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME, ELECTROSTATIC CHUCK, SUBSTRATE FIXING DEVICE, AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE PACKAGE

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT§DP
Filed
Jun 04, 2024
Priority
Jun 05, 2023 — JP 2023-092635
Examiner
CAVALLARI, DANIEL
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Shinko Electric Industries Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
662 granted / 844 resolved
+10.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
875
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
63.6%
+23.6% vs TC avg
§102
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 844 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 7 and 10 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected claims, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 3/16/2026. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1 and 7 and rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1 and 7 of U.S. Patent No. 12,431,379 in view of Yang US 2021/0330425. The difference between US 12,431,379 claims and the present application being that the patent claim requires one of: a solid solution having a body-centered cubic lattice structure in which cobalt and: iron, silicon, manganese, or nickel are solid-dissolved in tungsten whereas the present application US 18/732,928 claims a solid solution having a body-centered cubic lattice structure in which nickel and: manganese, niobium, or indium are solid-dissolved in tungsten. Yang teaches a chuck assembly comprising the equivalent alloys of the above comprising one or more of the following: [0112] The materials are used for manufacturing the needle files of present invention may include, but are not limited to, metals, alloys, oxides, plastics, composites, and mixtures thereof. Metals that may be used to fabricate a needle file of present invention, include, but are not limited to, Aluminum, Gallium, Indium, Tin, Thallium, Bismuth, Scandium, Titanium, Vanadium, Chromium, Manganese, Iron, Cobalt, Nickel, Copper, Zinc, Yttrium, Zirconium, Niobium, Molybdenum, Tantalum, Tungsten, Rhenium, Platinum, Gold, Cerium, Ytterbium and mixture thereof. Allows that may be used to fabricate a needle file of present invention, include, but are not limited to, Aluminum Alloys, Cobalt Alloys, Copper Alloys (Brass), Bronze (copper, tin, aluminum, or any other element), Aluminum bronze (copper, aluminum), Arsenical bronze (copper, arsenic), Nickel silver (copper, nickel), Gold Alloys, Indium Alloys, Iron or Ferrous Alloys, Steel (carbon), Stainless steel (chromium, nickel), Surgical stainless steel (chromium, molybdenum, nickel), Silicon steel, Magnesium Alloys, Mercury Alloys, Nickel Alloys, Ni—Ti alloys, Silver Alloys, Tin Alloys, Titanium Alloys, Zinc Alloys, and mixture thereof. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-6 and 8-9 would be allowable but for the double patenting rejection above and Claim 7 would be eligible for rejoinder. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL CAVALLARI whose telephone number is (571)272-8541. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 0900-18:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at (571)272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL CAVALLARI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 04, 2024
Application Filed
May 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683404
AC COUPLED CONTROLLER FOR POWER FLOW CONTROL VIA ELECTRIC VEHICLE DURING ISLANDING FROM GRID
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683396
POWER SOURCE, SUPERVISORY APPARATUS AND CONTROL SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671250
CONTROL APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665528
STARTUP CONTROL CIRCUIT, POWER TOOL, AND STARTUP CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654587
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONVERTING AND DISTRIBUTING REGENERATIVE POWER
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.2%)
2y 10m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 844 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month