Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/733,138

LOW-LOSS WAVEGUIDES FORMED IN HIGH-TRANSMISSION GLASS USING Ag-Na ION EXCHANGE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 04, 2024
Priority
Jan 18, 2018 — provisional 62/618,866 +2 more
Examiner
WASHVILLE, JEFFREY D
Art Unit
1766
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Corning Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
995 granted / 1245 resolved
+14.9% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-4.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1288
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
86.1%
+46.1% vs TC avg
§102
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1245 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions 2. Applicant’s election without traverse of Group 1, claims 1-11 in the reply filed on 8/29/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 12-18 are withdrawn. Information Disclosure Statement 3. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/23/2024 was filed timely. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 4. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 6. Claims 1-4 and 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (US 2016/0018949 A1) to Lambricht et al. (hereinafter Lambricht) in view of the teachings of (US 2008/0264107 A1) to Malinovich et al. (hereinafter Malinovich) in further view of (US 5,991,490) to Mizuuchi et al. (hereinafter Mizuuchi). Lambricht is directed toward a glass substrate configured as a waveguide. Lambricht discloses at paragraph [0003] that the substrate is glass and acts as a waveguide. Lambricht discloses at paragraph [0025] that Na2O is 0-10%, which reads on applicants range of 3 mol% to 15 mol%. Lambricht discloses at paragraph [0025] that Fe concentration is 0-5%, which reads on 20 ppm or less. Lambricht discloses at paragraph [0025] that the glass substrate is an aluminosilicate. Lambricht discloses at paragraph [0045] that the glass may have layers of high and low refractive indexes to form an antireflective surface on the glass. Lambricht discloses at paragraph [0009] that the glass substrate is connected to an electronic device. Lambricht discloses at paragraph [0019] that SiO2 is 55-78%, which reads on Applicants range of 65.79 mol% to 78.17 mol%. Lambricht discloses at paragraph [0019] that Al2O3 is 0-18%, which reads on Applicants range of 2.94 mol% to 12.12 mol%. Lambricht discloses at paragraph [0019] that Na2O is 5-20%, which reads on Applicants range of 3.52 mol% to 13.25 mol%. Malinovich is directed toward a glass substrate configured as a waveguide. Lambricht and Malinovich are both directed toward a glass substrate configured as a waveguide and therefore are analogous art. Malinovich teaches at paragraph [0014] that ion exchange is used to form high refractive indexes at predetermined portion of the substrate. Malinovich teaches at paragraph [0013] that a birefringence free product is made, which reads on Applicants magnitude of less than 0.001. Mizuuchi is directed toward a glass substrate configured as a waveguide. Lambricht and Mizuuchi are both directed toward a glass substrate configured as a waveguide and therefore are analogous art. Mizuuchi teaches at (C4, L43) that a waveguide is formed in a glass substrate. Mizuuchi teaches at (C26, L19) that the buried waveguide has a loss less than 1 db/cm that overlaps loss of 0.05 db/cm. It would be obvious to one skilled in the art at the time of the filing of the disclosure of Lambricht in view of the teachings of Malinovich and Mizuuchi to produce a buried optical waveguide having low losses that forms a prime facie case of obviousness for claims 1-4 and 9-11. Allowable Subject Matter 7. Claims 5-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 8. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art does not teach an optical waveguide having the refractive indexes at the claimed depth and bulk refractive index. Conclusion 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFREY D WASHVILLE whose telephone number is (571)270-3262. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. 10. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. 11. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached at 571-272-1302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. 12. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEFFREY D WASHVILLE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 04, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637393
ADVANCED COATING CHEMISTRIES FOR CMCS
3y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12642018
ELECTRONIC DEVICES COMPRISING SILICON CARBIDE MATERIALS
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630714
Thermoplastic Resin Composition and Molded Product Using Same
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12616227
STABLE CAROTENOID MICROCAPSULE HAVING HIGH BIOAVAILABILITY AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
3y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12619006
WAVELENGTH SELECTIVE ABSORPTION FILTER AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (-4.8%)
2y 8m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1245 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month