Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/733,704

OPTICAL SENSING OF TRANSLATIONAL AND ROTATIONAL SHAFT MOVEMENTS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 04, 2024
Priority
Sep 28, 2023 — provisional 63/541,246
Examiner
ELAHI, TOWFIQ
Art Unit
2625
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
581 granted / 732 resolved
+17.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
752
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
87.6%
+47.6% vs TC avg
§102
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§112
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 732 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 06/01/26 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 10, 11, 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Boonsom (US 20190017846) in view of Joet (US 20200025793) and Milkov (US 20230061926) and Hoover (US 20150168178). Regarding claim 1 Boonsom teaches an assembly for an electronic device (fig.1A-1B), comprising: a rotatable and translatable input device having an axis of rotation ([0044] crown 140 includes a dial or knob for receiving rotational input from the user and is operatively coupled to an optical encoder used to measure rotation of the dial or knob), a circumference about the axis of rotation (fig. 5A [0088] FIG. 5A, the optical encoder 500 may include an optical emitter 520 and a photodiode array 550 that are radially aligned with respect to the spindle 510. For example, the optical emitter 520 and the photodiode array 550 may be aligned with each other such that the reflected beam 545 is transverse to (e.g., perpendicular) to the axis of rotation of the spindle 510), and an optical encoder pattern disposed around the circumference, the optical encoder pattern including a series of polygon facets (fig. 5A, 515) about the circumference and a one-dimensional (1D) substantially retroreflective feature parallel to the axis of rotation (fig. 5A, [0087] the optical encoder 500 includes a spindle 510, an optical emitter 520 and an optical detector… detecting reflected light from the encoded pattern 515 may be used to determine aspects of the rotational movement the spindle 510); an optical emitter ([0087] an optical emitter 520) configured to emit electromagnetic radiation (fig. 5A, light from 520, as per Google; light is a form of electromagnetic radiation) toward the optical encoder pattern ([0087] encoded pattern 515); and the optical receiver (fig.4, 430) configured to receive reflections of the emitted electromagnetic radiation from the optical encoder pattern ([0084] the length of the spindle 410 is sufficient to enable the light 445 i.e., electromagnetic radiation, from the optical emitter 440 to be reflected off the spindle 410 and received by the photodiode array 430) and generate an irradiance pattern in response to the reflections (fig. 5B, pattern of reflected beam 545), the optical emitter (fig. 5B, 520) and the optical receiver (fig. 5B, 550) disposed along a sensing axis (red) [[orthogonal]] to the axis of rotation (purple). PNG media_image1.png 321 625 media_image1.png Greyscale an optical element (fig. 1B, 160) disposed between the rotatable and translatable input device (140) and the optical receiver (optical detector 180), Boonsom is silent on sensing axis orthogonal to the axis of rotation. However, Joet teach sensing axis orthogonal to the axis of rotation ([0094]). Boonsom teaches a base electronic device that would be improved by the orthogonal relation of sensing axis and rotation axis taught in the strain gauge sensor device of Joet. One of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized improvements afforded by the enclosures of Joet, and the combination would have yielded predictable results. Boonsom is silent on an optical receiver including a two-dimensional (2D) array of pixels having multiple rows and columns of pixels; the optical element configured to convert an angular change of a retroreflection from the optical encoder pattern, resulting from a translation of the input device, to a change of a spatial position of the retroreflection on the optical receiver; and the optical element is a cylindrical lens having a power axis oriented parallel to the sensing axis. However, Milkov teaches an optical receiver including a two-dimensional (2D) array of pixels having multiple rows and columns of pixels ([0030] The optical receiver 302 may include any suitable electronic device for detecting light transmitted by the optical transmitter 300 and reflected from the object 104. With reference to FIG. 3, according to one example, the optical receiver 302 includes one or more pixels 304. In the illustrated example, the optical receiver 302 includes an array 305 of pixels 304, i.e. in multiple rows and columns). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skilled in the art to combine Boonsom in light of Milkov teaching so that it may include an optical receiver including a two-dimensional (2D) array of pixels having multiple rows and columns of pixels. The motivation is to provide an optical receiver configured to receive the pulse of light generated by the optical transmitter. Further, Hoover teach the optical element configured to convert an angular change of a retroreflection from the optical encoder pattern, resulting from a translation of the input device, to a change of a spatial position of the retroreflection on the optical receiver (Abstract: angular and axial position sensor arrangement comprises several sensors arranged adjacently, and aligned parallel to the axis of an encoded member that is angularly and axially displaceable relative to the sensors. The encoded member comprises N-1 axial detection encoded rings with value A along their entire circumference and comprises an Nth axial detection encoded ring that is axially adjacent with value B, different from value A, along its entire circumference. The values of axial detection encoded rings are distinguishable by the sensors overlapping some axial detection encoded rings. The encoded member comprises several angular detections encoded rings axially adjacent to the Nth axial detection encoded ring. The angular detection encoded rings comprise a coding pattern composed of A and B values along their circumference to determine angular position by some sensors overlapping them [0033] [0131]); and the optical element is a cylindrical lens having a power axis oriented parallel to the sensing axis ([0088]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skilled in the art to combine Boonsom in light of Hoover teaching so that it may include the optical element configured to convert an angular change of a retroreflection from the optical encoder pattern, resulting from a translation of the input device, to a change of a spatial position of the retroreflection on the optical receiver; and the optical element is a cylindrical lens having a power axis oriented parallel to the sensing axis. The motivation is to provide a sensor arrangement adapted for detecting and determining angular as well as axial positions of an encoded member being rotatable as well as axially displaceable relative to a series of at least two sensors. Regarding claim 10 Boonsom teaches wherein an optical emission plane of the optical emitter differs from an image plane of the optical receiver (fig. 9A, 940 emission plane differs 930). Regarding claim 11 Boonsom teaches wherein the optical emitter comprises a light-emitting diode ([0053]). Regarding claim 12 Boonsom in view of Milkov teach wherein each pixel in the two-dimensional array of pixels comprises a single-photon avalanche diode (Milkov: [0031] Each pixel 304 includes a photodetector 314. The photodetector 314 is configured to generate a photocurrent pulse corresponding to the received pulse of light. In one example, the photodetector 314 is a PIN photodiode, but may be an avalanche photodiode (APD) or other type of photodiode). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-20 are allowed. Claims 4-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. -Pacala US 20200025879 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TOWFIQ ELAHI whose telephone number is (571)270-1687. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 10AM-3PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Boddie can be reached at (571)272-0666. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOWFIQ ELAHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2625
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Sep 25, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 25, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 25, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 17, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 01, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681580
SKIN STIMULATION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DRIVING SKIN STIMULATION DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681691
INPUT DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675253
SCREEN PROJECTION METHOD, VIDEOCONFERENCING DEVICE, AND SYSTEM
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670840
Circuit Apparatus And Display System
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12656862
METHOD FOR DETECTING GESTURES OF AN EYE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+14.6%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 732 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month