Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/733,829

MANUFACTURING METHOD OF ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE IMAGE DEVELOPING TONER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 04, 2024
Priority
Jul 05, 2023 — JP 2023-111047
Examiner
SULLIVAN IV, CHARLES COLLINS
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
69 granted / 100 resolved
+9.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
117
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 100 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tomita (US 20210255558). Regarding claims 1-7, Tomita discloses a toner formed by aggregation and coalesced resin fine particles ([0177]-[0179]). Tomita further discloses a method of producing Polyester Resin A, using 30 parts terephthalic acid, 70 parts fumaric acid, 5 parts BPA ethylene oxide adduct, and 95 parts BPA propylene oxide adduct, stirred in a flask for 1 hour as the temperature is raised to 220°C, adding titanium tetraethoxide in an amount of 1 part per 100 parts of the mixture, increasing the temperature to 230°C over 30 minutes, and reacting for 1 hour before cooling ([0325]). A resin fine particle dispersion (P1) is then formed by charging 200 parts polyester resin A, 0.4 parts of 25% sodium hydroxide aqueous solution, 2 parts Basic Violet 11:1 into a twin screw extruder, melting at a barrel temperature of 90°C and a screw speed of 400 RPM. The melt is then emulsified with 3 separate additions of 150 parts water adjusted to 90°C, with a supply rate of 12 kg/h. the resultant dispersion has a solid content of 31%, and an average particle size of 0.2µm, or 200 nm ([0328]-[0329]). This is identical to the process of the Instant Application except for the temperature during the melt and emulsification stages, which is 95°C instead of Tomita’s 90°C (Instant Specification [0126]-[0132], page 29-31). One of skill in the art would understand the melting and emulsification steps would take the same amount of time, 30 seconds, because the same amount of material is fed through the same twin screw extruder, at the same supply rate. Therefore, the value of T x ln R would be 90 x ln 30 = 306. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES COLLINS SULLIVAN IV whose telephone number is (571)272-2208. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.C.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1737 /AMBER R ORLANDO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 04, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12736890
TONER
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730389
EXTERNAL ADDITIVE FOR TONER AND TONER
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12699335
CORE-SHELL PARTICLE, AND TONER
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693608
CARRIER CORE MATERIAL, AND ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC DEVELOPMENT CARRIER AND ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHIC DEVELOPER USING SAME
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687796
TONER, TONER PRODUCTION METHOD, AND TWO-COMPONENTDEVELOPER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+12.5%)
3y 2m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 100 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month