Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/734,036

LASER LEVEL ASSEMBLY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 05, 2024
Priority
Jun 06, 2023 — provisional 63/506,445 +3 more
Examiner
GUADALUPE, YARITZA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Stanley Black & Decker Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
954 granted / 1157 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1171
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
58.2%
+18.2% vs TC avg
§102
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§112
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1157 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on October 11, 2024; October 15, 2024 and April 18, 2025 were filed in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings filed June 5, 2024 are accepted. Abstract The Abstract filed June 5, 2024 is accepted. Specification The specification filed June 5, 2024 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 5, 12 – 15 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Caelwaerts et al. (US Pub. No. 2023/0115417 A1). With respect to claim 1, Caelwaerts et al. discloses a laser level assembly comprising a mounting bracket (210) comprising an attachment bracket (216) and a movable bracket (230, 290); a laser level (30) mounted on the movable bracket (230, 290), the laser level configured to project at least one of a horizontal line, a vertical line or a laser spot (Paragraph [0059], line 5); a motor (240) in the movable bracket (See Figure 23), wherein the motor is configured to drive movement of the movable bracket relative to the attachment bracket (Paragraph [0089]); and a clutch operatively associated with the motor (See Paragraph [0092]). PNG media_image1.png 534 624 media_image1.png Greyscale Referring to claim 2, Caelwaertz et al. sets forth a laser level assembly further comprising a pinion driven by the motor (worm wheel 238). In regards to claim 3, Caelwaertz et al. teaches a laser level assembly wherein the clutch is operatively coupled between the motor (240) and the pinion (238) as shown in figure 23. Regarding claim 4, Caelwaertz et al. shows a laser level assembly wherein the attachment bracket (216) comprises a rack (234). With regards to claim 5, Caelwaertz et al. discloses a laser level assembly wherein the pinion (238) is engaged with the rack (234). Referring to claim 12, Caelwaertz et al. discloses a laser level assembly comprising an attachment bracket (216); a movable bracket (230, 290) attached to the attachment and configured to translate relative to the attachment bracket; a laser level (30) mounted on the movable bracket (230, 290), the laser level configured to project at least one of a horizontal line, a vertical line or a laser spot (Paragraph [0059], line 5); a motor (240) in the movable bracket (See Figure 23), wherein the motor is configured to drive translation of the movable bracket relative to the attachment bracket (Paragraph [0089]); and further comprising a clutch operatively associated with the motor (See Paragraph [0092]). PNG media_image1.png 534 624 media_image1.png Greyscale In regards to claim 13, Caelwaertz et al. sets forth a laser level assembly further comprising a pinion driven by the motor (worm wheel 238). Regarding claim 14, Caelwaertz et al. teaches a laser level assembly wherein the clutch is operatively coupled between the motor (240) and the pinion (238) as shown in figure 23. With respect to claims 15 and 18, Caelwaertz et al. shows a laser level assembly wherein the attachment bracket (216) comprises a rack (234). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 – 11 and 16 - 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 19 – 20 are allowed. Reasons for Allowance The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 6 – 11 are allowable because the prior art fails to teach or suggest a laser level assembly comprising an attachment bracket further comprises a door that is movable between an open position and a closed position; wherein when the door is in the closed position, the door blocks the pinion from disengagement from the rack; and wherein when the door is in the open position, the door does not block the pinion from disengagement from the rack; wherein the attachment bracket comprises magnets; and wherein the movable bracket comprises a biasing member that biases the movable bracket away from the attachment bracket to facilitate movement of the movable bracket relative to the attachment bracket in combination with the remaining limitations of the claims. Claims 16 – 17 are allowable because the prior art fails to teach or suggest a laser level assembly comprising a clutch operatively associated with the motor; wherein the clutch comprises a first clutch part with first teeth and a second clutch part with second teeth; wherein the pinion is integral with the second clutch part in combination with the remaining limitations of the claims. Claims 19 – 20 are allowable because the prior art fails to teach or suggest a laser level assembly comprising a mounting bracket comprising an attachment bracket and a movable bracket; wherein the attachment bracket further comprises a door that is movable between an open position and a closed position; wherein when the door is in the closed position, the door blocks the pinion from disengagement from the rack; and wherein when the door is in the open position, the door does not block the pinion from disengagement from the rack in combination with the remaining limitations of the claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following references are considered relevant but fail to teach the combination as claimed: Muller et al. (US Pub. No. 2021/0055104) discloses a laser instrument comprising a tripod and a rotary base, and a laser instrument projecting a laser line (4) but fails to teach the combination as claimed including an attachment bracket and a movable bracket. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YARITZA GUADALUPE-MCCALL whose telephone number is (571)272-2244. The examiner can normally be reached Mon -Thu, 8:00am - 6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Laura E Martin can be reached at 571-272-2160. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. YARITZA GUADALUPE-MCCALL Primary Examiner Art Unit 2855 July 1, 2026 /YARITZA GUADALUPE-MCCALL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680803
MEASURING DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680324
Laszlo stud leveler
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680802
DISPLACEMENT MEASURING INSTRUMENT
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674666
STRING LINE APPARATUS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668077
MULTI-PURPOSE ANALOGUE DEVICE FOR TRACING CURVES AND GEOMETRIC TRANSFORMATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+14.7%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1157 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month