Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/734,193

Anamorphic directional illumination device

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jun 05, 2024
Priority
Jun 20, 2023 — provisional 63/521,906
Examiner
THOMAS, BRANDI N
Art Unit
2872
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Reald Spark LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
924 granted / 1118 resolved
+14.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1138
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
57.7%
+17.7% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1118 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 2-31, 35-40, 42-51, 54-56, 59, 61, 65-66, 68-78 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 8/10/2026. Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1, 32-34, 41, 52-53, 57-58, 60, 62-64, and 67 in the reply filed on 8/10/2026 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgement is made of receipt of Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO-1449) filed 8/22/2024, 8/26/2024, 10/23/2024, 1/3/2025, and 3/26/2025. An initialed copy is attached to this Office Action. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claim 1, 32-34, 41, 52-53, 57-58, 60, 62-64, and 67 provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 1, 15-16, 21, and 26 of copending Application No. 18/211,789 (reference application). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because of the claim limitations summarized in the table below. Identical portions of the reference claims have been bolded for ease of identification. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. 18/734,193 18/211,789 1. An anamorphic near-eye display apparatus comprising: an illumination system comprising a spatial light modulator, the illumination system being arranged to output light; and an optical system arranged to direct light from the illumination system to a viewer's eye, wherein the optical system has an optical axis and has anamorphic properties in a lateral direction and a transverse direction that are perpendicular to each other and perpendicular to the optical axis, wherein the spatial light modulator comprises pixels distributed in the lateral direction, and the optical system comprises: a transverse anamorphic component having positive optical power in the transverse direction, wherein the transverse anamorphic component is arranged to receive light from the spatial light modulator and the illumination system is arranged so that light output from the transverse anamorphic component is directed in directions that are distributed in the transverse direction; an input waveguide arranged to receive light from the transverse anamorphic component; a partially reflective mirror, the input waveguide being arranged to guide light from the transverse anamorphic component to the partially reflective mirror along the input waveguide, and the partially reflective mirror being arranged to reflect at least some of that light; an intermediate waveguide arranged to receive at least some of the light reflected by the partially reflective mirror, a lateral anamorphic component having positive optical power in the lateral direction, the intermediate waveguide being arranged to guide the light received from the partially reflective mirror to the lateral anamorphic component along the intermediate waveguide in a first direction; a light reversing reflector that is arranged to reflect light that has been guided along the intermediate waveguide in the first direction so that the reflected light is guided along the intermediate waveguide in a second direction opposite to the first direction to the partially reflective mirror, the partially reflective mirror being arranged to transmit at least some of that light; and an extraction waveguide arranged to receive at least some of the light transmitted by the partially reflective mirror that has been guided in the second direction along the intermediate waveguide, wherein the extraction waveguide comprises an array of reflective extraction features, the reflective extraction features being arranged to extract light guided along the extraction waveguide towards an eye of a viewer, the array of reflective extraction features being distributed along the extraction waveguide so as to provide exit pupil expansion. 1. An anamorphic near-eye display apparatus comprising: an illumination system comprising a spatial light modulator, the illumination system being arranged to output light; and an optical system arranged to direct light from the llumination system to a viewer's eye, wherein the optical system has an optical axis and has anamorphic properties in a lateral direction and a transverse direction that are perpendicular to each other and perpendicular to the optical axis, wherein the spatial light modulator comprises pixels distributed in the lateral direction, and the optical system comprises: a transverse anamorphic component having positive optical power in the transverse direction, wherein the transverse anamorphic component is arranged to receive light from the spatial light modulator and the illumination system is arranged so that light output from the transverse anamorphic component is directed in directions that are distributed in the transverse direction; an extraction waveguide arranged to receive light from the transverse anamorphic component; a lateral anamorphic component having positive optical power in the lateral direction, the extraction waveguide being arranged to guide light from the transverse anamorphic component to the lateral anamorphic component along the extraction waveguide in a first direction; and a light reversing reflector that is arranged to reflect light that has been guided along the extraction waveguide in the first direction so that the reflected light is guided along the extraction waveguide in a second direction opposite to the first direction, wherein the extraction waveguide comprises an array of extraction features, the array of extraction features being arranged to transmit light guided along the extraction waveguide in the first direction and to extract light guided along the extraction waveguide in the second direction towards an eye of a viewer, the array of extraction features being distributed along the extraction waveguide so as to provide exit pupil expansion, and the lateral anamorphic component comprises: a reflective linear polariser polarizer disposed between the light reversing reflector and the array of extraction features; and a polarisation polarization conversion retarder disposed between the reflective linear polariser polarizer and the light reversing reflector, the polarisation polarization conversion retarder being arranged to convert a polarisation polarization state of light passing therethrough between a linear polarisation polarization state and a circular polarisation polarization state. 21. (Previously Presented) An anamorphic near-eye display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the optical system further comprises: an input waveguide arranged to receive light from the transverse anamorphic component; a partially reflective mirror, the input waveguide being arranged to guide light from the transverse anamorphic component to the partially reflective mirror along the input waveguide, and the partially reflective mirror being arranged to reflect at least some of that light; an intermediate waveguide arranged to receive at least some of the light reflected by the partially reflective mirror; a lateral anamorphic component having positive optical power in the lateral direction, the intermediate waveguide being arranged to guide the light received from the partially reflective mirror to the lateral anamorphic component along the intermediate waveguide in a first direction; a light reversing reflector that is arranged to reflect light that has been guided along the intermediate waveguide in the first direction so that the reflected light is guided along the intermediate waveguide in a second direction opposite to the first direction to the partially reflective mirror, the partially reflective mirror being arranged to transmit at least some of that light; and wherein the extraction waveguide is arranged to receive at least some of the light transmitted by the partially reflective mirror that has been guided in the second direction along the intermediate waveguide. 32. An anamorphic near-eye display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the extraction waveguide has a front guide surface and a rear guide surface, and the rear guide surface comprises extraction facets that are the reflective extraction features. 16. An anamorphic near-eye display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the extraction waveguide has a front guide surface and a rear guide surface, and the rear guide surface comprises extraction facets that are the array of extraction features, each extraction facet being arranged to reflect light guided in the second direction towards an eye of a viewer through the front guide surface. 52. An anamorphic near-eye display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the transverse anamorphic component comprises a lens. 26. An anamorphic near-eye display apparatus according to claim 23, wherein the transverse anamorphic component further comprises at least one lens element. 63. An anamorphic near-eye display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the reflective extraction features are inclined with respect to the first and second directions along the optical axis. 15. An anamorphic near-eye display apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the array of extraction features have a surface normal direction that is inclined with respect to the direction along the waveguide by an angle in the range 20 to 40 degrees. Claims 33-34, 41, 53, 57-58, 60, 62, 64, and 67 are dependent from claim 1 and are rejected for the reasons given above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRANDI N THOMAS whose telephone number is (571)272-2341. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30 - 3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephone Allen can be reached at 571-272-2434. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRANDI N THOMAS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 05, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740698
PREDICTING CLINICAL PARAMETERS RELATING TO GLAUCOMA FROM CENTRAL VISUAL FIELD PATTERNS
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730300
SPATIALLY VARIABLE HYDROPHOBIC LAYERS FOR DIGITAL MICROFLUIDICS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730352
OPTICAL SWITCH AND SWITCHING METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724313
ARBITRARILY TAILORABLE ELECTROCHROMIC DEVICE AND USE THEREOF
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12721518
EYE SCOPES
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 10m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1118 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month