Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/735,024

TOPICAL COMPOSITIONS

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Jun 05, 2024
Priority
Jul 03, 2019 — provisional 62/870,154 +2 more
Examiner
SAEED, ALI S
Art Unit
1616
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Illustris Pharmaceuticals Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
32%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 32% of cases
32%
Career Allowance Rate
42 granted / 133 resolved
-28.4% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
70 currently pending
Career history
211
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
45.4%
+5.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.2%
-31.8% vs TC avg
§112
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 133 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority This application is a Continuation of 17869665, filed 07/20/2022, 17869665 is a Continuation of 16920460, filed 07/03/2020, 16920460 Claims Priority from Provisional Application 62870154, filed 07/03/2019. Information Disclosure Statement The IDS filed on 6/20/2024 has been considered. See the attached PTO 1449 form. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group I (claims 1-16) and hyaluronic acid as the species of extracellular matrix component and acetyl hexapeptide-3 as the species of therapeutic peptide, in the reply filed on 8/20/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 3, 11-12 and 17-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention or species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Status Receipt of Remarks filed on 8/20/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-20 are currently pending. Claims 3, 11-12 and 17-20 have been withdrawn. Accordingly, claims 1, 2, 4-10, 13-16 are currently under examination. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1, line 4, the recitation “Daltons,;” should delete the extra comma or semicolon. Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 2, 4-10, 13-16 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-21 of U.S. Patent No. 12036263B2. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because ‘263 also claims a composition comprising an extracellular matrix component and a therapeutic peptide, wherein the extracellular matrix component consists of an extracellular matrix component with an average molecular weight of less than about 100,000 Daltons, wherein the extracellular matrix component is at a concentration of about 0.1 wt. % to about 5 wt. % based on the total weight of the composition; and wherein the therapeutic peptide is at a concentration of about 5 wt. % to about 25 wt. % based on the total weight of the composition. The extracellular matrix component or fragment thereof is selected from the group consisting of hyaluronic acid, collagen, fibronectin, elastin, lectin, and a combination thereof. The therapeutic peptide is selected from the group consisting of palmitoyl oligopeptide, palmitoyl tripeptide-1, palmitoyl tetrapeptide-7, acetyl hexapeptide-3, and combinations thereof. The concentration of therapeutic peptide is about 5 wt. % to 20 wt. %. The composition further comprising one or more pharmaceutical additives selected from the group consisting of diluents, fillers, disintegrants, binders, lubricants, surfactants, hydrophobic vehicles, water soluble vehicles, emulsifiers, buffers, humectants, moisturizers, solubilizers, preservatives, colorants, plasticizers, carriers, excipients, and a combination thereof. The therapeutic peptide is selected from the group consisting of dipeptides, tripeptides, tetrapeptides, pentapeptides, hexapeptides and a combination thereof. The composition further comprising a vitamin selected from the group consisting of vitamin D, vitamin K, vitamin B, vitamin A, vitamin E, and vitamin C, or a combination thereof. The composition further comprising an oil control agent selected from the group consisting of salicylic acid, dehydroacetic acid, benzoyl peroxide, and vitamin B3, or a mixture thereof. The composition further comprising a skin care agent selected from the group consisting of retinal, salicylate, minocycline, and lidocaine. The composiion further comprising a hydrating composition, which is a lubricating vehicle, which is selected from the group consisting of petrolatum, petrolatum plus volatile silicone, lanolin, cold cream, and hydrophilic ointment. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALI SAEED whose telephone number is (571)272-2371. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, SUE X LIU can be reached at 5712725539. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALI S SAEED/ Examiner, Art Unit 1616
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 05, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740925
COMPOSITIONS AND ARTICLES FOR MAKE-UP REMOVAL
7y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740562
HERBICIDE COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR FORMULATING AND USING THE SAME
5y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12599694
SCAFFOLD WOUND DRESSING
4y 0m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12564192
HERBICIDAL AGENT COMPOSITION AND WEED CONTROL METHOD
4y 0m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12485161
COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SULFORAPHANE OR A SULFORAPHANE PRECURSOR AND A MILK THISTLE EXTRACT OR POWDER
3y 11m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
32%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+33.8%)
4y 0m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 133 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month