Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/735,279

Dual Cosmetic Product

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 06, 2024
Examiner
OLIVER, BRADLEY S
Art Unit
3754
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Blancour Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
416 granted / 683 resolved
-9.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
728
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.6%
+14.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 683 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the boundary between the first cosmetic composition and the second cosmetic composition that has, at the smaller depth of the first cosmetic composition, a rounded shape must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-8, 10-13, and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Look (US 6695510). Regarding claim 1, Look discloses a cosmetics product, comprising: a solid cosmetic composition forming a stick and including, in a cosmetically- acceptable medium: at least one first pigment suspended in a first cosmetic composition (16); and a second cosmetic composition (14) which is differentiated from the first cosmetic composition by one or more of color, pigment, or finish (col. 6, ll. 30-46), wherein along a width of a top of the stick, a depth of the first cosmetic composition gradually decreases from a larger depth to a smaller depth (See annotated Fig. 2n below). PNG media_image1.png 137 246 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Look discloses the cosmetics product of claim 1, wherein in a cross-section along a plane that is perpendicular to an axis along a length of the solid composition, a boundary between the first cosmetic composition and the second cosmetic composition has a "V" shape, with two straight lines extending from a point at an angle to each other (Fig. 2n). Regarding claim 3, Look discloses the cosmetics product of claim 1, wherein the gradual decrease is linear and monotonic (Fig. 2n). Regarding claim 5, Look discloses the cosmetics product of claim 1, wherein the second cosmetic composition is colorless (col. 6, ll. 33-36). Regarding claim 6, Look discloses a cosmetic product, comprising: a solid cosmetic composition forming a stick and including: at least a first cosmetic composition (16) containing, in a cosmetically-acceptable medium, a first pigment, and a second cosmetic composition (14) containing, in a cosmetically-acceptable medium, a second pigment different from the first pigment (col. 6, ll. 30-46), wherein along a width of a top of the stick, a depth of the first cosmetic composition gradually decreases from a larger depth to a smaller depth (Fig. 2n). Regarding claim 7, Look discloses the cosmetics product of claim 6, wherein in a cross-section along a plane that is perpendicular to an axis along a length of the solid cosmetic composition, a boundary between the first cosmetic composition and the second cosmetic composition has a "V" shape, with two straight lines extending from a point at an angle to each other (Fig. 2n). Regarding claim 8, Look discloses the cosmetics product of claim 6, wherein the gradual decrease is linear and monotonic (Fig. 2n). Regarding claim 10, Look discloses the cosmetics product of claim 6, wherein the second cosmetic composition is colorless (col. 6, ll. 33-36). Regarding claim 11, Look discloses a cosmetics product, comprising: a dispenser (12); and a solid cosmetic composition forming a stick and housed in the dispenser, and wherein the solid cosmetic composition has a top protruding from the dispenser (Fig. 2n), and wherein the solid cosmetic composition includes, in a cosmetically-acceptable medium: at least one first pigment suspended in a first cosmetic composition (16), and a second cosmetic composition (14) which is differentiated from the first cosmetic composition by one or more of color, pigment, or finish (col. 6, ll. 30-46), wherein along a width of the top of the stick, a first amount of the first cosmetic composition is gradually decreased with respect to a second amount of the second cosmetic composition (Fig. 2n). Regarding claim 12, Look discloses the cosmetics product of claim 11, wherein in a cross-section along a plane that is perpendicular to an axis along a length of the solid cosmetic composition, a boundary between the first cosmetic composition and the second cosmetic composition has a "V" shape, with two straight lines extending from a point at an angle to each other (Fig. 2n). Regarding claim 13, Look discloses the cosmetics product of claim 11, wherein the gradual decrease is linear and monotonic (Fig. 2n). Regarding claim 15, Look discloses the cosmetics product of claim 11, wherein the second cosmetic composition is colorless (col. 6, ll. 33-36). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4, 9, and 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Look. Regarding claims 4, 9, and 14, Look teaches the cosmetics product of claims 1, 6, and 11, respectively, wherein, in a cross-section along a plane that is perpendicular to an axis along a length of the solid cosmetic composition, a boundary between the first cosmetic composition and the second cosmetic composition has, at the smaller depth of the first cosmetic composition, a rounded shape (Fig. 2h). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have changed the shape of the first and second compositions of Look such that in a cross-section along a plane that is perpendicular to an axis along a length of the solid cosmetic composition, a boundary between the first cosmetic composition and the second cosmetic composition has, at the smaller depth of the first cosmetic composition, a rounded shape, wherein doing so would merely be a matter of selecting a different shape or combining several shapes within the teachings of Look (Figs. 2a-2y and col. 5, ll. 20-45). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The Ambler, O’Reilly, Kapustin, Chao, Palo, and Costo Lucco references are cited as being directed to the state of the art of cosmetic sticks with more than one composition. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRADLEY S OLIVER whose telephone number is (571)270-3787. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7-3 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Angwin can be reached at (571)270-3735. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRADLEY S OLIVER/Examiner, Art Unit 3754
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594782
RETRACTABLE WRITING UTENSIL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583248
DRAWING MATERIAL CONTAINER CARTRIDGE AND DRAWING MATERIAL CONTAINER SET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564257
REFILL UNIT FOR SUNSCREEN AND REFILLABLE STICK CONTAINER HAVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12545047
WRITING INSTRUMENT PART, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING WRITING INSTRUMENT PART, AND WRITING INSTRUMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12507785
PRESS-TYPE MAKEUP PEN
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 683 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month