Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/735,298

VEHICLE WINDOW SWITCH MODULE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 06, 2024
Examiner
SAEED, AHMED M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
605 granted / 749 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
42.2%
+2.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 749 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 11, 13 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Buckley (US. Pat. 10,752,190). Regarding claim 1, Buckley teaches a window switch module for operating a plurality of moveable windows 13 in a vehicle, the window switch module comprising: a primary switch 12 configured to selectively open and close each of the plurality of moveable windows; and a plurality of secondary switches (A-D) operatively connected to the primary switch, wherein each secondary switch is configured to select operation of at least one of the moveable windows via actuation of the main switch (Figs. 1-3 and col. 4, lines 20-65). Regarding claim 11, Buckley teaches a vehicle defining a vehicle interior and comprising: a plurality of moveable windows 13, including a left-front window, a left-rear window, a right-front window, and a right-rear window; a window switch module 11 arranged within the vehicle interior and comprising: a primary switch 12 configured to selectively open and close each of the plurality of moveable windows; and a plurality of secondary switches (A-D) operatively connected to the primary switch, wherein each secondary switch is configured to select operation of at least one of the moveable windows via actuation of the main switch (Figs. 1-3 and col. 4, lines 20-65). Regarding claim 2, Buckley teaches the window switch module of claim 1, wherein the plurality of moveable windows includes a left-front window, a left-rear window, a right-front window, and a right-rear window Figs. 1-3 and col. 4, lines 20-65). Regarding claims 5 and 13, Buckley teaches the switch module wherein the plurality of secondary switches includes: a first button A configured to select operation of the left-front window via the primary switch; a second button B configured to select operation of the right-front window via the primary switch; a third button C configured to select operation of the left-rear window via the primary switch; and a fourth button D configured to select operation of the right-rear window via the primary switch (Figs. 1-3). Regarding claims 6 and 15, Buckley teaches the window switch module further comprising a tertiary switch (switch 12 acts as a tertiary switch) operatively connected to the primary switch and configured to select a predefined position of at least one of the moveable windows via actuation of the primary switch and at least one of the secondary switches (multi-tap or depression functionality on the selected windows to move them to predefined positions, such as 1 tap gives a ¾ height, 2 taps gives ½ height, see col. 8, lines 10-25). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3, 4, 7-10, 12, 14, 16-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Buckley in view of Sakai (US. Pat. 7,262,375). Buckley teaches a master window switch module for operating a plurality of moveable windows 13, including a left-front window, a left-rear window, a right-front window, and a right-rear window in a vehicle, the window switch module comprising: a primary switch 12 configured to selectively open and close each of the plurality of moveable windows; and a plurality of secondary switches (A-D) operatively connected to the primary switch, wherein each secondary switch is configured to select operation of at least one of the moveable windows via actuation of the main switch ((Figs. 1-3 and col. 4, lines 20-65), as required by claim 20; wherein the plurality of secondary switches includes: a first three switch (0, A, C) defining: a first position (position 0) configured to select operation of the left-front window via the primary switch (switch A operates left-front window); a second position (position 0) configured to select operation of the left-rear window via the primary switch (switch C operates left-rear window); and a third position configured to deselect operation of each of the left-front window and the left-rear window via the primary switch in a first mode (position 0 turns off grouping-left-front and left-rear are deselected from simultaneous operation and work individually, see Fig. 3a and col. 4, lines 30-65) and select simultaneous operation of the left-front window and the left-rear window via the primary switch in a second mode (the second mode has two different positions, where all fours switches A-D are grouped together and simultaneously operate, see Fig. 3b; and where switches A-b grouped together and C-D grouped together, see Fig. 3C and col. 4, lines 20-65); and a second three- switch (0, B, D) defining: a first position (position 0) configured to select operation of the right-front window via the primary switch (switch B operates right-front window); a second position (position 0) configured to select operation of the right-rear window via the primary switch (switch D operates right-rear window); and a third position configured to deselect operation of each of the right-front window and the right-rear window via the primary switch in a first mode (position 0 turns off grouping-right-front and right-rear are deselected from simultaneous operation and work individually, see Fig. 3a and col. 4, lines 30-65) and select simultaneous operation of the right-front window and the right-rear window via the primary switch in a second mode (the second mode has two different positions, where all fours switches A-D are grouped together and simultaneously operate, see Fig. 3b; and where switches A-B grouped together and C-D grouped together, see Fig. 3C and col. 4, lines 20-65), as required by claims 3, 12 and 20; wherein the second mode of operation of the first (A, C) and second three switches (B, D) is defined when each of the first three switch and the second three switch is in its respective third position (Fig. 3b), as required by claims 4, 14 and 20. Buckley does not teach the claimed structure of the secondary switch (three-way switches). However. Sakai teaches a similar window switch module with a primary switch SW3 and a secondary switch SW1, wherein the secondary switch includes a first three-way switches (L1, L4, and center) and a second three-way switches (L2, L3, and center), as required by claims 3, 4, 12, 14, and 20. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Sakai in the switch of Buckley to provide an improved ergonomics and user convenience. Buckley does not teach the following a mirror position regulator, a window operation lockout switch, and a switch configured to operate vehicle door locks. However. Sakai teaches a similar window module that comprises a mirror position regulator SW4 configured to operate one or more vehicle side mirrors (Fig. 1 and col. 3, lines 1-10), as required by claims 7 and 16; further comprising a function selector (SW1 acts as a function selector) configured to select between operation of the primary switch SW1 and the mirror position regulator SW4 (col. 3, lines 10-20), as required by claims 8 and 17; further comprising a window operation lockout switch SW6 (Fig. 1 and col. 3, lines 1-10), as required by claim 9 and 18; further comprising a switch configured to operate vehicle door locks (Fig. 1 and col. 3, lines 1-10), as required by claims 10 and 19. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to add mirror controls, a function selector, window lockout and door lock switches to the window switch panel of Buckley to create a highly integrated multi-functional master control panel on the driver’s door, as is conventional in the automotive art for improved ergonomics and convenience. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED M SAEED whose telephone number is (571)270-7976. The examiner can normally be reached 10-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke can be reached at 571-272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED M SAEED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706256
SWITCH DISCONNECTOR WITH AN ARC EXTINGUISHING SHIELD PLATE
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704869
ROCKER DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700555
BALANCED LOW TRAVEL KEY SWITCH DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12683101
SWITCH APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681592
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 749 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month