Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/735,881

METHODS, APPARATUSES AND SYSTEMS FOR CLASSIFYING USER EQUIPMENT MEASUREMENTS FOR POSITIONING ESTIMATION

Non-Final OA §102§103§112§Other
Filed
Jun 06, 2024
Priority
Nov 03, 2022 — continuation of PCTCN2022129585
Examiner
DONADO, FRANK E
Art Unit
2641
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
ZTE Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
367 granted / 528 resolved
+7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +59% interview lift
Without
With
+59.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
551
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
56.6%
+16.6% vs TC avg
§102
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 528 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Preliminary Amendment The present Office Action is based upon the original patent application filed on 6/6/2024, as modified by the preliminary amendment, filed on 7/13/2026. Claims 1-20 are pending in the present application. Priority Domestic Applicant’s claim for domestic priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C.120, 121, or 365(c) or 365 (a) of any PCT Application international application is acknowledged, which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement submitted on 6/6/2024 and 5/22/2025 has been considered by the Examiner and made of record in the application file. Claim Objections Claim 11 is objected to for minor informalities and require the following or other appropriate correction: Claims 5, 10, 15 and 20 are objected to for minor informalities and require the following or other appropriate correction: The acronyms “ARP”, “TRP” and “DL-PRS” must be completely spelled out. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 5, 10, 15 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claims contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The acronyms “ARP” and “DL-PRS” are not defined in the specification. Since they are a part of the originally filed claims, they are considered a part of the original disclosure, and so these terms are not considered New Matter. However, they should be spelled out and defined in the specification, within the context of the supported claims. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 6-8, 11-13 and 16-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a2) as being anticipated by Li, et al (US PG Publication 2022/0417887), hereafter Li. Regarding claim 1, Li teaches a method performed by a wireless communication node, the method comprising: transmitting, to a wireless communication device, an assistance data request for assistance data, wherein the assistance data is related to an error source ([0215] 3. The UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability receives the LPP signaling RequestLocationInformation from the server (LMF – see [0207]), hereafter LMF/server [0220] The LMF receives the measurement value, it compares it with the AL to obtain the result of whether the GNSS system positioning is reliable); receiving the assistance data from the wireless communication device ([0220] The LMF receives the measurement value, it compares it with the AL to obtain the result of whether the GNSS system positioning is reliable); and performing a positioning integrity analysis based on the assistance data ([0220] When the LMF receives the measurement value, it performs weighted calculation in combination with other GNSS integrity components to obtain the integrity PL (ProtectionLevel) value of the terminal, and compares it with the AL to obtain the result of whether the GNSS system positioning is reliable). Regarding claim 2, Li teaches the method of claim 1, further comprising: transmitting a measurement initiation request related to a carrier phase configured to be received by the wireless communication device ([0216] 4. When the UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability performs the GNSS positioning method under the request of RequestLocationInformation, and completes the related integrity function monitoring and auxiliary measurement, it provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include: [0217] a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value); and receiving a measurement initiation response related to a carrier phase, wherein the measurement initiation response comprises a plurality of measurements performed by the wireless communication device ([0216] 4. The UE provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include: [0217] a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value [0218] 5. The UE provides the measurement component related to the GNSS positioning method through the ProvideLocationInformation, and the measurement component is one or a combination of the following information: [0219] a carrier phase integrity measurement value). Regarding claim 3, Li teaches the method of claim 2, further comprising: transmitting a measurement request for at least one of a carrier phase related measurement or a measurement quality parameter ([0215] 3. When the UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability receives the LPP signaling RequestLocationInformation from the server, it reads the integrity-related requirement in the QoS, and performs auxiliary measurement function and supports integrity auxiliary monitoring on the terminal side according to the parameters such as Authentication Flag, TTA, etc., in the QoS, combined with the auxiliary data and its integrity indication broadcasted by the network [0216] 4. When the UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability performs the GNSS positioning method under the request of RequestLocationInformation, and completes the related integrity function monitoring and auxiliary measurement, it provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include one or a combination of the following information: [0217] The integrity parameter values for the GNSS-dependent measurement components: a multipath parameter value, an electromagnetic interference parameter value, a satellite fault parameter value, a pseudo-range correction integrity parameter value, and a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value); and receiving a measurement result report based on the measurement request, wherein the measurement result report comprises the at least one of a carrier phase related measurement or a measurement quality parameter ([0215] 3. The UE performs auxiliary measurement function and supports integrity auxiliary monitoring on the terminal side according to the parameters such as Authentication Flag, TTA, etc., in the QoS, combined with the auxiliary data and its integrity indication broadcasted by the network [0216] 4. When the UE completes the related integrity function monitoring and auxiliary measurement, it provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include one or a combination of the following information: [0217] The integrity parameter values for the GNSS-dependent measurement components: a multipath parameter value, an electromagnetic interference parameter value, a satellite fault parameter value, a pseudo-range correction integrity parameter value, and a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value). Regarding claim 6, Li teaches a method performed by a wireless communication device, comprising: receiving an assistance data request for assistance data configured to be transmitted by a wireless communication node ([0215] 3. The UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability receives the LPP signaling RequestLocationInformation from the server (LMF – see [0207]), hereafter LMF/server); and transmitting the assistance data, wherein the assistance data is related to an error source ([0220] The LMF receives the measurement value, it compares it with the AL to obtain the result of whether the GNSS system positioning is reliable [0220] The LMF receives the measurement value, it compares it with the AL to obtain the result of whether the GNSS system positioning is reliable), wherein the wireless communication node is configured to perform a positioning integrity analysis based on the assistance data ([0220] When the LMF receives the measurement value, it performs weighted calculation in combination with other GNSS integrity components to obtain the integrity PL (ProtectionLevel) value of the terminal, and compares it with the AL to obtain the result of whether the GNSS system positioning is reliable). Regarding claim 7, Li teaches the method of claim 6, further comprising: receiving a measurement initiation request related to a carrier phase ([0216] 4. When the UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability performs the GNSS positioning method under the request of RequestLocationInformation, and completes the related integrity function monitoring and auxiliary measurement, it provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include: [0217] a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value); and transmitting a measurement initiation response related to a carrier phase configured to be received by the wireless communication node, wherein the measurement initiation response comprises a plurality of measurements performed by the wireless communication device ([0216] 4. The UE provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include: [0217] a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value [0218] 5. The UE provides the measurement component related to the GNSS positioning method through the ProvideLocationInformation, and the measurement component is one or a combination of the following information: [0219] a carrier phase integrity measurement value). Regarding claim 8, Li teaches the method of claim 7, further comprising: receiving a measurement request for at least one of a carrier phase related measurement or a measurement quality parameter ([0215] 3. When the UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability receives the LPP signaling RequestLocationInformation from the server, it reads the integrity-related requirement in the QoS, and performs auxiliary measurement function and supports integrity auxiliary monitoring on the terminal side according to the parameters such as Authentication Flag, TTA, etc., in the QoS, combined with the auxiliary data and its integrity indication broadcasted by the network [0216] 4. When the UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability performs the GNSS positioning method under the request of RequestLocationInformation, and completes the related integrity function monitoring and auxiliary measurement, it provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include one or a combination of the following information: [0217] The integrity parameter values for the GNSS-dependent measurement components: a multipath parameter value, an electromagnetic interference parameter value, a satellite fault parameter value, a pseudo-range correction integrity parameter value, and a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value); and transmitting a measurement result report based on the measurement request, wherein the measurement result report comprises the at least one of a carrier phase related measurement or a measurement quality parameter ([0215] 3. The UE performs auxiliary measurement function and supports integrity auxiliary monitoring on the terminal side according to the parameters such as Authentication Flag, TTA, etc., in the QoS, combined with the auxiliary data and its integrity indication broadcasted by the network [0216] 4. When the UE completes the related integrity function monitoring and auxiliary measurement, it provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include one or a combination of the following information: [0217] The integrity parameter values for the GNSS-dependent measurement components: a multipath parameter value, an electromagnetic interference parameter value, a satellite fault parameter value, a pseudo-range correction integrity parameter value, and a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value). Regarding claim 11, Li teaches a wireless communication node comprising ([0207] LMF Location Management Function): a transceiver configured to: transmit, to a wireless communication device, an assistance data request for assistance data, wherein the assistance data is related to an error source ([0215] 3. The UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability receives the LPP signaling RequestLocationInformation from the server (LMF – see [0207]), hereafter LMF/server [0220] The LMF receives the measurement value, it compares it with the AL to obtain the result of whether the GNSS system positioning is reliable); and receive the assistance data from the wireless communication device ([0220] The LMF receives the measurement value, it compares it with the AL to obtain the result of whether the GNSS system positioning is reliable); and at least one processor configured to: perform a positioning integrity analysis based on the assistance data ([0220] When the LMF receives the measurement value, it performs weighted calculation in combination with other GNSS integrity components to obtain the integrity PL (ProtectionLevel) value of the terminal, and compares it with the AL to obtain the result of whether the GNSS system positioning is reliable). Regarding claim 12, Li teaches the wireless communication node of claim 11, the transceiver is further configured to: transmit a measurement initiation request related to a carrier phase configured to be received by the wireless communication device ([0216] 4. When the UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability performs the GNSS positioning method under the request of RequestLocationInformation, and completes the related integrity function monitoring and auxiliary measurement, it provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include: [0217] a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value), and receive a measurement initiation response related to a carrier phase, wherein the measurement initiation response comprises a plurality of measurements performed by the wireless communication device ([0216] 4. The UE provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include: [0217] a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value [0218] 5. The UE provides the measurement component related to the GNSS positioning method through the ProvideLocationInformation, and the measurement component is one or a combination of the following information: [0219] a carrier phase integrity measurement value). Regarding claim 13, Li teaches the wireless communication node of claim 12, the transceiver is further configured to: transmit a measurement request for at least one of a carrier phase related measurement or a measurement quality parameter ([0215] 3. When the UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability receives the LPP signaling RequestLocationInformation from the server, it reads the integrity-related requirement in the QoS, and performs auxiliary measurement function and supports integrity auxiliary monitoring on the terminal side according to the parameters such as Authentication Flag, TTA, etc., in the QoS, combined with the auxiliary data and its integrity indication broadcasted by the network [0216] 4. When the UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability performs the GNSS positioning method under the request of RequestLocationInformation, and completes the related integrity function monitoring and auxiliary measurement, it provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include one or a combination of the following information: [0217] The integrity parameter values for the GNSS-dependent measurement components: a multipath parameter value, an electromagnetic interference parameter value, a satellite fault parameter value, a pseudo-range correction integrity parameter value, and a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value); and receive a measurement result report based on the measurement request, wherein the measurement result report comprises the at least one of a carrier phase related measurement or a measurement quality parameter ([0215] 3. The UE performs auxiliary measurement function and supports integrity auxiliary monitoring on the terminal side according to the parameters such as Authentication Flag, TTA, etc., in the QoS, combined with the auxiliary data and its integrity indication broadcasted by the network [0216] 4. When the UE completes the related integrity function monitoring and auxiliary measurement, it provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include one or a combination of the following information: [0217] The integrity parameter values for the GNSS-dependent measurement components: a multipath parameter value, an electromagnetic interference parameter value, a satellite fault parameter value, a pseudo-range correction integrity parameter value, and a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value). Regarding claim 16, Li teaches a wireless communication device comprising ([0215] UE): a transceiver configured to: receive an assistance data request for the assistance data configured to be transmitted by a wireless communication node ([0215] 3. The UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability receives the LPP signaling RequestLocationInformation from the server (LMF – see [0207]), hereafter LMF/server), transmit the assistance data, wherein the assistance data is related to an error source ([0220] The LMF receives the measurement value, it compares it with the AL to obtain the result of whether the GNSS system positioning is reliable [0220] The LMF receives the measurement value, it compares it with the AL to obtain the result of whether the GNSS system positioning is reliable); wherein the wireless communication node is configured to perform a positioning integrity analysis based on the assistance data ([0220] When the LMF receives the measurement value, it performs weighted calculation in combination with other GNSS integrity components to obtain the integrity PL (ProtectionLevel) value of the terminal, and compares it with the AL to obtain the result of whether the GNSS system positioning is reliable). Regarding claim 17, Li teaches the wireless communication device of claim 16, the transceiver is further configured to: receive a measurement initiation request related to a carrier phase ([0216] 4. When the UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability performs the GNSS positioning method under the request of RequestLocationInformation, and completes the related integrity function monitoring and auxiliary measurement, it provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include: [0217] a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value); and transmit a measurement initiation response related to a carrier phase configured to be received by a wireless communication node, wherein the measurement initiation response comprises a plurality of measurements performed by the wireless communication device ([0216] 4. The UE provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include: [0217] a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value [0218] 5. The UE provides the measurement component related to the GNSS positioning method through the ProvideLocationInformation, and the measurement component is one or a combination of the following information: [0219] a carrier phase integrity measurement value). Regarding claim 18, Li teaches the wireless communication device of claim 16, the transceiver is further configured to: receive a measurement request for at least one of a carrier phase related measurement or a measurement quality parameter ([0215] 3. When the UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability receives the LPP signaling RequestLocationInformation from the server, it reads the integrity-related requirement in the QoS, and performs auxiliary measurement function and supports integrity auxiliary monitoring on the terminal side according to the parameters such as Authentication Flag, TTA, etc., in the QoS, combined with the auxiliary data and its integrity indication broadcasted by the network [0216] 4. When the UE supporting only the UE-Assisted capability performs the GNSS positioning method under the request of RequestLocationInformation, and completes the related integrity function monitoring and auxiliary measurement, it provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include one or a combination of the following information: [0217] The integrity parameter values for the GNSS-dependent measurement components: a multipath parameter value, an electromagnetic interference parameter value, a satellite fault parameter value, a pseudo-range correction integrity parameter value, and a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value); and transmit a measurement result report based on the measurement request, wherein the measurement result report comprises the at least one of a carrier phase related measurement or a measurement quality parameter ([0215] 3. The UE performs auxiliary measurement function and supports integrity auxiliary monitoring on the terminal side according to the parameters such as Authentication Flag, TTA, etc., in the QoS, combined with the auxiliary data and its integrity indication broadcasted by the network [0216] 4. When the UE completes the related integrity function monitoring and auxiliary measurement, it provides the integrity-related auxiliary measurement values to the network through the LPP protocol ProvideLocationInformation, which include one or a combination of the following information: [0217] The integrity parameter values for the GNSS-dependent measurement components: a multipath parameter value, an electromagnetic interference parameter value, a satellite fault parameter value, a pseudo-range correction integrity parameter value, and a carrier phase integrity correction parameter value). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 4, 9, 14 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li, in view of Kaufmann (US PG Publication 2022/0244405). Regarding claim 4, Li teaches the method of claim 1. Li does not teach wherein performing a positioning integrity analysis based on the assistance data comprises: performing the positioning integrity analysis by obtaining an error distribution related parameter of the assistance data. In the same field of endeavor, Kaufmann teaches wherein performing a positioning integrity analysis based on the assistance data comprises: performing the positioning integrity analysis by obtaining an error distribution related parameter of the assistance data ([0043] Estimating the integrity of the position fix may comprise modelling an error distribution of the corrected ranging measurements). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the invention of Li, which includes determining positioning errors using assistance data, to include Kaufmann’s teaching of performing positioning integrity analysis through error distribution of the assistance data, for the benefit of characterizing delay variations, for use in improving the accuracy of a position fix and/or improving the accuracy with which the integrity of a position fix can be estimated (see [0008]). Regarding claim 9, Li teaches the method of claim 6. Li does not teach wherein the wireless communication node is configured to perform the positioning integrity analysis based on the assistance data by: performing the positioning integrity analysis by obtaining an error distribution related parameter of the assistance data. In the same field of endeavor, Kaufmann teaches wherein the wireless communication node is configured to perform the positioning integrity analysis based on the assistance data by: performing the positioning integrity analysis by obtaining an error distribution related parameter of the assistance data ([0043] Estimating the integrity of the position fix may comprise modelling an error distribution of the corrected ranging measurements). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the invention of Li, which includes determining positioning errors using assistance data, to include Kaufmann’s teaching of performing positioning integrity analysis through error distribution of the assistance data, for the benefit of characterizing delay variations, for use in improving the accuracy of a position fix and/or improving the accuracy with which the integrity of a position fix can be estimated (see [0008]). Regarding claim 14, Li teaches the wireless communication node of claim 11. Li does not teach wherein the at least one processor is configured to perform a positioning integrity analysis based on the assistance data by: performing the positioning integrity analysis by obtaining an error distribution related parameter of the assistance data. In the same field of endeavor, Kaufmann teaches wherein the at least one processor is configured to perform a positioning integrity analysis based on the assistance data by: performing the positioning integrity analysis by obtaining an error distribution related parameter of the assistance data ([0043] Estimating the integrity of the position fix may comprise modelling an error distribution of the corrected ranging measurements). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the invention of Li, which includes determining positioning errors using assistance data, to include Kaufmann’s teaching of performing positioning integrity analysis through error distribution of the assistance data, for the benefit of characterizing delay variations, for use in improving the accuracy of a position fix and/or improving the accuracy with which the integrity of a position fix can be estimated (see [0008]). Regarding claim 19, Li teaches the wireless communication device of claim 16. Li does not teach wherein the wireless communication node is configured to perform the positioning integrity analysis based on the assistance data by: performing the positioning integrity analysis by obtaining an error distribution related parameter of the assistance data. In the same field of endeavor, Kaufmann teaches wherein the wireless communication node is configured to perform the positioning integrity analysis based on the assistance data by: performing the positioning integrity analysis by obtaining an error distribution related parameter of the assistance data ([0043] Estimating the integrity of the position fix may comprise modelling an error distribution of the corrected ranging measurements). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the invention of Li, which includes determining positioning errors using assistance data, to include Kaufmann’s teaching of performing positioning integrity analysis through error distribution of the assistance data, for the benefit of characterizing delay variations, for use in improving the accuracy of a position fix and/or improving the accuracy with which the integrity of a position fix can be estimated (see [0008]). Claims 5, 10, 15, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Li, in view of Manolakos, et al (US PG Publication 2024/0172172), hereafter Manolakos. Regarding claim 5, Li teaches the method of claim 2. Li does not teach wherein the assistance data and/or the plurality of measurements correspond to at least one of the following error sources: ARP location, TRP location, Inter-TRP synchronization, boresight direction of DL-PRS related error, beam information of DL-PRS related error. In the same field of endeavor, Manolakos teaches wherein the assistance data and/or the plurality of measurements correspond to at least one of the following error sources: ARP location, TRP location, Inter-TRP synchronization, boresight direction of DL-PRS related error, beam information of DL-PRS related error ([0029] The physical TRPs may be an array of antennas, where the base station employs beamforming of the base station [0122] The LPP Provide Assistance Data message at stage 530 may be sent by the LMF 570 to the UE 504 [0125] At stage 550, the UE 504 utilizes the assistance information received at stage 530 and any additional data (e.g., a desired location accuracy or a maximum response time) received at stage 540 to perform positioning operations (e.g., measurements of DL-PRS) [0141] Tx TEGs may be provided to the UE in the assistance data (e.g., LPP Provide Assistance Data message at stage 530). Currently, the following features are expected to be supported for mitigating TRP Tx timing errors and/or UE Rx timing errors for DL-TDOA. A TRP should be able to provide the association information of DL-PRS resources with Tx TEGs to the location server if the TRP has multiple TEGs). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the invention of Li, which includes determining positioning errors using assistance data, to include Manolakos’ teaching of determining positioning errors using assistance data, including DL-PRSs, for the benefit of mitigating TRP timing errors, so that a TRP is able to provide the association information of DL-PRS (see [0141]). Regarding claim 10, Li teaches the method of claim 7. Li does not teach wherein the assistance data and/or the plurality of measurements correspond to at least one of the following error sources: ARP location, TRP location, Inter-TRP synchronization, boresight direction of DL-PRS related error, beam information of DL-PRS related error. In the same field of endeavor, Manolakos teaches wherein the assistance data and/or the plurality of measurements correspond to at least one of the following error sources: ARP location, TRP location, Inter-TRP synchronization, boresight direction of DL-PRS related error, beam information of DL-PRS related error ([0029] The physical TRPs may be an array of antennas, where the base station employs beamforming of the base station [0122] The LPP Provide Assistance Data message at stage 530 may be sent by the LMF 570 to the UE 504 [0125] At stage 550, the UE 504 utilizes the assistance information received at stage 530 and any additional data (e.g., a desired location accuracy or a maximum response time) received at stage 540 to perform positioning operations (e.g., measurements of DL-PRS) [0141] Tx TEGs may be provided to the UE in the assistance data (e.g., LPP Provide Assistance Data message at stage 530). Currently, the following features are expected to be supported for mitigating TRP Tx timing errors and/or UE Rx timing errors for DL-TDOA. A TRP should be able to provide the association information of DL-PRS resources with Tx TEGs to the location server if the TRP has multiple TEGs). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the invention of Li, which includes determining positioning errors using assistance data, to include Manolakos’ teaching of determining positioning errors using assistance data, including DL-PRSs, for the benefit of mitigating TRP timing errors, so that a TRP is able to provide the association information of DL-PRS (see [0141]). Regarding claim 15, Li teaches the wireless communication node of claim 12. Li does not teach wherein the assistance data and/or the plurality of measurements correspond to at least one of the following error sources: ARP location, TRP location, Inter-TRP synchronization, boresight direction of DL-PRS related error, beam information of DL-PRS related error. In the same field of endeavor, Manolakos teaches wherein the assistance data and/or the plurality of measurements correspond to at least one of the following error sources: ARP location, TRP location, Inter-TRP synchronization, boresight direction of DL-PRS related error, beam information of DL-PRS related error ([0029] The physical TRPs may be an array of antennas, where the base station employs beamforming of the base station [0122] The LPP Provide Assistance Data message at stage 530 may be sent by the LMF 570 to the UE 504 [0125] At stage 550, the UE 504 utilizes the assistance information received at stage 530 and any additional data (e.g., a desired location accuracy or a maximum response time) received at stage 540 to perform positioning operations (e.g., measurements of DL-PRS) [0141] Tx TEGs may be provided to the UE in the assistance data (e.g., LPP Provide Assistance Data message at stage 530). Currently, the following features are expected to be supported for mitigating TRP Tx timing errors and/or UE Rx timing errors for DL-TDOA. A TRP should be able to provide the association information of DL-PRS resources with Tx TEGs to the location server if the TRP has multiple TEGs). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the invention of Li, which includes determining positioning errors using assistance data, to include Manolakos’ teaching of determining positioning errors using assistance data, including DL-PRSs, for the benefit of mitigating TRP timing errors, so that a TRP is able to provide the association information of DL-PRS (see [0141]). Regarding claim 20, Li teaches the wireless communication device of claim 17. Li does not teach wherein the assistance data and/or the plurality of measurements correspond to at least one of the following error sources: ARP location, TRP location, Inter-TRP synchronization, boresight direction of DL-PRS related error, beam information of DL-PRS related error. In the same field of endeavor, Manolakos teaches wherein the assistance data and/or the plurality of measurements correspond to at least one of the following error sources: ARP location, TRP location, Inter-TRP synchronization, boresight direction of DL-PRS related error, beam information of DL-PRS related error ([0029] The physical TRPs may be an array of antennas, where the base station employs beamforming of the base station [0122] The LPP Provide Assistance Data message at stage 530 may be sent by the LMF 570 to the UE 504 [0125] At stage 550, the UE 504 utilizes the assistance information received at stage 530 and any additional data (e.g., a desired location accuracy or a maximum response time) received at stage 540 to perform positioning operations (e.g., measurements of DL-PRS) [0141] Tx TEGs may be provided to the UE in the assistance data (e.g., LPP Provide Assistance Data message at stage 530). Currently, the following features are expected to be supported for mitigating TRP Tx timing errors and/or UE Rx timing errors for DL-TDOA. A TRP should be able to provide the association information of DL-PRS resources with Tx TEGs to the location server if the TRP has multiple TEGs). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the invention of Li, which includes determining positioning errors using assistance data, to include Manolakos’ teaching of determining positioning errors using assistance data, including DL-PRSs, for the benefit of mitigating TRP timing errors, so that a TRP is able to provide the association information of DL-PRS (see [0141]). Conclusion Citation of Pertinent Prior Art not Applied The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hao, et al (US PG Publication 2023/0284176), hereafter Hao, teaches a positioning method and related apparatus. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Examiner Frank Donado whose telephone number is (571) 270-5361. The examiner can normally be reached Mondays through Fridays between 8 am and 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s Supervisor Patent Examiner (SPE) Charles Appiah can be reached at 571-272-7904. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FRANK E DONADO/Examiner, Art Unit 2641 /CHARLES N APPIAH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706869
MEDIA ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM
5y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707462
METHOD, APPARATUS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM
1y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701482
SWITCHING CELLS BASED ON MONITORING PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT MESSAGES
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689948
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR FACILITATING VOICE COMMUNICATION SERVICES IN NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689961
METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER STORAGE MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+59.0%)
3y 0m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 528 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month