Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/736,073

Mandible Graft Reconstruction Assembly, System and Procedure

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 06, 2024
Priority
Jun 06, 2023 — provisional 63/471,475
Examiner
WOLF, MEGAN YARNALL
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Kls Martin L P
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
379 granted / 621 resolved
-9.0% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
658
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.4%
+0.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 621 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I, claim 1, in the reply filed on 8/4/2026 is acknowledged. Claim 2 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 8/4/2026. Power of Attorney The examiner was not permitted to discuss an examiner’s amendment for the issues below because it appears applicant has legal representation but a valid power of attorney has not been filed in the present application. Providing representative information in an Application Data Sheet (ADS) does not constitute a power of attorney. See 37 CFR 1.76(b)(4) and MPEP § 408. For information on appointing a power of attorney, see MPEP § 402.02 et seq. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1, line 4, “the surface configuration” is believed to be in error for --a surface configuration--. In claim 1, line 7, “the location” is believed to be in error for --a location--. In claim 1, line 10, “a patient’s mandible” is believed to be in error for --the patient’s mandible--. In claim 1, line 17, “a fibula flap” is believed to be in error for --the fibula flap--. In claim 1, line 18, “the physical model” is believed to be in error for --the physical 3-D model--. In claim 1, line 20, “the 3-D model” is believed to be in error for --the physical 3-D model--. In claim 1, line 26, “the 3-D physical model” is believed to be in error for --the physical 3-D model--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1, line 26 (step (m)), recites “transitioning the reconstruction assembly from the 3-D physical model onto the patient”. This is unclear because the reconstruction assembly is defined in step (b) as comprising a fixation implant, a dental prosthesis, anterior and posterior positioning extensions, implant posts, and a fibula flap, but step (l) removes the positioning extensions from the dental prosthesis. It is therefore unclear if the positioning extensions are part of the reconstruction assembly that is transitioned onto the patient in step (m). If the positioning extensions are not placed onto the patient, step (m) could be amended to recite each of the parts of the reconstruction assembly listed in step (b) minus the positioning extensions. For applicant’s convenience, proposed amendments to claim 1 are shown below. 1. A mandible reconstruction method comprising the steps of: (a) creating a virtual 3-D model of a patient’s mandible that has been resected, (b) designing components of a reconstruction assembly comprising a fixation implant contoured to a surface configuration of the patient’s remaining bone, a dental prosthesis, anterior and posterior positioning extensions joined to the dental prosthesis, implant posts, and a fibula flap, (c) determining a location for positioning recesses to receive the anterior and posterior positioning extensions and screw apertures for affixation of the fixation implant in the virtual 3-D model, (d) creating a physical 3-D model of [[a]] the patient’s mandible that has been resected, the physical 3-D model including the positioning recesses to receive the anterior and posterior positioning extensions and screw apertures for affixation of the fixation implant (e) manufacturing the fixation implant, dental prosthesis, anterior and posterior positioning extensions joined to the dental prosthesis, and implant posts, (f) inserting the implant posts into a fibula, (g) harvesting segments from the fibula, (h) affixing the fibula segments to the fixation implant to create [[a]] the fibula flap, (i) positioning the dental prosthesis onto the physical 3-D model such that the positioning extensions are received by the positioning recesses, (j) affixing the fixation implant and fibula flap onto the physical 3-D model with the implant posts extending into bores in the dental prosthesis, (k) applying resin to cement the dental prosthesis to the implant posts, the positioning extensions ensuring the correct location and orientation of the dental prosthesis relative to the fixation implant, (l) removing the positioning extensions from the dental prosthesis, and (m) transitioning the fixation implant, dental prosthesis, implant posts, and fibula flap from the physical 3-D Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. It appears claim 2 would be allowable upon being amended to positively recite the 3-D physical model of the patient’s mandible comprising the positioning recesses. Note that claim 2, line 2 should recite --a surface configuration-- instead of “the surface configuration”. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art is considered Qaisi et al. “Fibula Jaw in a Day: State of the Art in Maxillofacial Reconstruction”, J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74:1284.e1-1284.e15, 2016 (hereafter referred to as Qaisi). Qaisi discloses a mandible reconstruction method comprising virtual 3D modeling and using a physical 3D model to configure a reconstruction assembly comprising a fixation implant, a dental prosthesis, implant posts, and a fibula flap (at least figs. 9A-9D), but Qaisi does not disclose anterior and posterior positioning extensions joined to the dental prosthesis or positioning recesses to receive the anterior and posterior positioning extensions and screw apertures for affixation of a fixation implant in the physical 3-D model. Toranto US 2022/0362023 discloses positioning extensions 4404 joined to a reconstruction assembly (fig.44), but does not disclose a physical 3-D model comprising recesses to receive the positioning extensions and does not disclose the step of removing the positioning extensions. Therefore, the prior art does not disclose, teach, or suggest the mandible reconstruction method as recited in claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MEGAN Y WOLF whose telephone number is (571)270-3071. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8am-2pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Melanie Tyson can be reached at (571)272-9062. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MEGAN Y WOLF/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 06, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751823
MECHANICAL GUIDES FOR PREFERENTIAL LEAFLET FOLDING DURING CRIMPING
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12746126
IMPLANT FOR FUSING AT LEAST TWO BONE COMPONENTS AND METHOD OF FUSING BONE COMPONENTS USING THE IMPLANT
5y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746127
SLEEVE AUGMENT DEVICE FOR AN ARTICULATED JOINT
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12728012
IMPLANTABLE COMPONENT WITH IMPROVED ANCHORING MEANS FOR ANKLE PROSTHESIS AND ANKLE PROSTHESIS COMPRISING SUCH A COMPONENT
5y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12714569
Hip Joint Device and Method
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.1%)
3y 6m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 621 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month