Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/738,181

WIRE HARNESS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 10, 2024
Priority
Feb 28, 2022 — JP 2022-028840 +1 more
Examiner
PANG, ROGER L
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
976 granted / 1092 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1114
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
43.8%
+3.8% vs TC avg
§102
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§112
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1092 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The following action is in response to application 18/738,181 filed on June 10, 2024. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. With regard to claim 5, on lines 3-4, the limitation of “the plurality of links” lacks antecedent basis. The plurality of links is not claimed until claim 3. This problem occurs in claim 6 as well. Since claim 7 depends on claim 3, this claim has antecedent basis. The claims will be treated as best understood. Claim Interpretation “A terminal” has been interpreted as a point of electrical contact. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Uchigata (JP 2007196925A from IDS). Please see annotated Figure 4 below for some of the noted limitations: PNG media_image1.png 351 699 media_image1.png Greyscale With regard to claim 1, Uchigata teaches a wire harness comprising: a harness body W that electrically connects a first electrical connection target @72 installed in a slide door 4 and a second electrical connection target @30 installed in a vehicle body B, wherein when the slide door is at a fully open position D3 with respect to the vehicle body, the harness body is routed on a side of a slide direction during an opening operation of the slide door with respect to a link mechanism 16/18 that connects the slide door and the vehicle body and reciprocates the slide door in the slide direction with respect to the vehicle body. With regard to claim 2, Uchigata teaches the harness, wherein a terminal (Fig. 4) on a side of the first electrical connection target @72 in the harness body is assembled to a side of the slide door at a position equivalent to a coupling portion 36 on a side of the slide door in the link mechanism in the slide direction (Fig. 2/4) or on a side of the slide direction during the opening operation with respect to the coupling portion on the side of the slide door when the slide door is at a fully closed position with respect to the vehicle body, and a terminal (Fig. 4) on a side of the second electrical connection target @30 in the harness body is assembled to a side of the vehicle body B at a position equivalent to a coupling portion 26r on the side of the vehicle body in the link mechanism in the slide direction or on a side of the slide direction during the opening operation with respect to the coupling portion on the side of the vehicle body when the slide door is at the fully closed position with respect to the vehicle body. With regard to claims 3 and 4, Uchigata teaches the harness, wherein when the slide door is at the fully open position D3 with respect to the vehicle body, the harness body is routed on the side of the slide direction during the opening operation with respect to the link mechanism 16 arranged on a most front side of the vehicle among a plurality of the link mechanisms 16/18 arranged at intervals in a vehicle vertical direction (Figs. 2 and 4). With regard to claims 5, 6 and 7, Uchigata teaches the harness, wherein the harness body is routed between two adjacent link mechanisms 16/18 in a vehicle vertical direction among the plurality of the link mechanisms arranged at intervals in the vehicle vertical direction (Fig. 2; harness is wired upwards (paragraph 26) and then below link 18/above link 16). With regard to claims 8, 9, and 10, Uchigata teaches the harness, wherein the harness body is routed between an upper link mechanism 18 and a lower link mechanism 16 arranged at an interval in a vehicle vertical direction (Fig. 2; harness is wired upwards (paragraph 26) and then below link 18/above link 16). Suggestions for Applicant Based on the cited art, it is suggested applicant focus on the relative locations of the terminals with respect to both link mechanisms. One suggestion would be to include the limitations of claim 2 and 9 into claim 1, and also claim the entire wiring harness is located between the upper and lower link mechanisms, wherein the terminal on the side of the first electrical connection target is located vertically below the coupling portion on the slide door and the terminal on a side of the second electrical connection target is located vertically below the coupling portion on the vehicle body. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Maeda (JP2001151042A) has been cited to show a similar wiring harness comprising: a harness body W/H, link mechanism 300, vehicle body 100, sliding door 200, wherein terminals of the wiring harness are located at equivalent coupling portions between the linkage mechanism and the respective door and vehicle body (Fig. 3). Gotou (US 7284785)( has been cited to show a similar wiring harness comprising: a harness body 13, vehicle body 1, door 5 and connector portions 9/11. Sato (US 7905537) has been cited to show a similar wiring harness comprising: a harness body 14, link mechanism 2, vehicle body 4, sliding door 1, wherein terminals of the wiring harness are located at equivalent coupling portions between the linkage mechanism and the respective door and vehicle body (Fig. 1). Kogure (US 12233791 and US 12275358) have been cited to show similar inventions from the same assignee and inventors that do not have double patenting issues. FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION Submission of your response by facsimile transmission is encouraged. The central facsimile number is (571) 273-8300. Recognizing the fact that reducing cycle time in the processing and examination of patent applications will effectively increase a patent's term, it is to your benefit to submit responses by facsimile transmission whenever permissible. Such submission will place the response directly in our examining group's hands and will eliminate Post Office processing and delivery time as well as the PTO's mail room processing and delivery time. For a complete list of correspondence not permitted by facsimile transmission, see MPEP 502.01. In general, most responses and/or amendments not requiring a fee, as well as those requiring a fee but charging such fee to a deposit account, can be submitted by facsimile transmission. Responses requiring a fee which applicant is paying by check should not be submitting by facsimile transmission separately from the check. Responses submitted by facsimile transmission should include a Certificate of Transmission (MPEP 512). The following is an example of the format the certification might take: I hereby certify that this correspondence is being facsimile transmitted to the Patent and Trademark Office (Fax No. (571) 273-8300) on ____________ (Date) Typed or printed name of person signing this certificate: _____________________________________ _____________________________________ (Signature) If your response is submitted by facsimile transmission, you are hereby reminded that the original should be retained as evidence of authenticity (37 CFR 1.4 and MPEP 502.02). Please do not separately mail the original or another copy unless required by the Patent and Trademark Office. Submission of the original response or a follow-up copy of the response after your response has been transmitted by facsimile will only cause further unnecessary delays in the processing of your application; duplicate responses where fees are charged to a deposit account may result in those fees being charged twice. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROGER L PANG whose telephone number is (571)272-7096. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 05:30-16:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob Scott can be reached at 571-270-3415. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROGER L PANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3655 /ROGER L. PANG/ Examiner Art Unit 3655B June 16, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679285
OHC MOUNTING BRACKET FOR VEHICLES
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668311
GLASS ROOF ASSEMBLY FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668193
Glove Box Hinge Detent Device
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668107
SUNROOF MECHANICAL ASSEMBLY AND SUNROOF DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668314
LOWER STRUCTURE OF VEHICLE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+7.0%)
2y 2m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1092 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month