Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/738,545

SYSTEM COMPRISING MOTOR UNIT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 10, 2024
Examiner
JOHNSON, RASHAD H
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Makita Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
443 granted / 554 resolved
+12.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
579
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
46.9%
+6.9% vs TC avg
§102
31.7%
-8.3% vs TC avg
§112
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 554 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 6/10/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zugen et al. (US 2020/0384625). In claim 14, Zugen discloses (Fig. 1-10) a system comprising: a motor unit (120) comprising a motor (140) including a motor shaft (150), and a fixing member (121); a first working unit (106) configured to be selectively fixed to the fixing member (121) and be driven by the motor shaft (150), wherein the motor shaft (150) extends in a left-right direction when the first working unit (106) is operated by a user; and a second working unit (108) configured to be selectively fixed to the fixing member (121) and driven by the motor shaft (150), wherein the motor shaft (150) extends in an up-down direction when the second working unit (108) is operated by the user. In claim 15, Zugen discloses (Fig. 1-10) a system comprising: a motor unit (120) comprising a motor (140), an output member (123) configured to driven by the motor, and a fixing member (121); a first working unit (106) configured to be selectively fixed to the fixing member (121) of the motor unit (120) and be driven by the motor (140); and a second working unit (108) configured to be selectively fixed to the fixing member (121) of the motor unit (120) and be driven by the motor (140), wherein the output member comprises: a first output member (123 of 106) configured to be selectively fixed to the motor and drive the first working unit (106); and a second output member (123 of 108) configured to be selectively fixed to the motor (140) and drive the second working unit (108). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-13 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The cited prior art taken singularly or in combination fails to anticipate or fairly suggest the limitation of the independent claim(s), in such a manner that a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 would be proper. The prior art fails to teach a combination of all the features as presented in the independent claim(s) with the allowable feature being: Claim 1: “the first working unit comprises a first manipulation member configured to be manipulated by a user to drive the motor, and the second working unit comprises a second manipulation member configured to be manipulated by the user to drive the motor.”. Zugen et al. (US 2020/0384625) has been cited as prior art most closely related to the claimed invention. In claim 1, Zugen (Fig. 1-10) teaches a system comprising: a motor unit (120) comprising a motor (140), an output member (302) configured to be driven by the motor (140), and a fixing member (121); a first working unit (106) configured to be selectively fixed to the fixing member (121) of the motor unit (120) and be driven by the output member (302); and a second working unit (108) configured to be selectively fixed to the fixing member (121) of the motor unit (120 and be driven by the output member (302), wherein the first working unit (106) differs from the second working unit (108), in a case where the fixing member (121) is fixed to the first working unit (106), the fixing member (121) of the motor unit (120) is oriented in a first direction relative to a reference plane when the first working unit (106) and the motor unit (120) are in a first working posture relative to the reference plane, in a case where the fixing member (121) is fixed to the second working unit (108), the fixing member (121) of the motor unit (120) is oriented in a second direction relative to the reference plane when the second working unit (108) and the motor unit (120) are in a second working posture relative to the reference plane, wherein the second direction is different from the first direction. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Zeiler et al. (US 20201/0384746) teaches a battery assembly including a housing having a handle, rechargeable battery cells disposed within the housing, and a mating feature configured to selectively connect the battery assembly with a receptacle of at least one of a power equipment and a charging station. Noel et al. (US 2024/0335934) teaches a power tool device that includes a housing, a battery pack interface configured to receive at least one battery pack. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RASHAD H JOHNSON whose telephone number is (571)272-1231. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christopher Koehler can be reached at 571-272-3560. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. RASHAD H. JOHNSON Examiner Art Unit 2834 /RASHAD H JOHNSON/Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 10, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597823
Rotor and Method for Producing a Rotor
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597819
Insulation Device, Motor Stator and Motor
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12573921
ELECTRO-MAGNETIC SHIELD TO PREVENT BEARING AND/OR GEARBOX DAMAGE DUE TO SHAFT INDUCED VOLTAGE IN ELECTRIC MOTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573907
STATOR HAVING SLOTS FILLED WITH RESIN FOR INSULATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567790
MAGNETIC FLUX MODULATED TYPE MAGNETIC GEAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 554 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month