Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/738,793

VEHICLE FLOOR MAT STRUCTURE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jun 10, 2024
Priority
Jul 18, 2023 — JP 2023-116856
Examiner
FREEDMAN, LAURA
Art Unit
3614
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
SUBARU Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
1062 granted / 1218 resolved
+35.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1244
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§103
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1218 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to the amendment filed 31 July 2026, in which claims 1 and 3-5 were amended and claims 6-20 were added. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the inclined portion" in line 9. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Additionally, claim 1 sets forth “an inclined portion” in line 10, and it is unclear if these are the same inclined portion. Examiner suggests initially presenting “an inclined portion”, and then referencing back to this feature with the term “the” or “said”. Clarification and rephrasing are required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 appear to be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the allowable subject matter of claim 1 is a combination of features, including a floor panel comprising a first wall and a second wall located closer to the rear seat than the first wall, a floor mat comprising an upward inclined surface extending from a position corresponding to a lower end of the second wall toward a position corresponding to an upper end of the second wall and toward the rear seat, and the floor mat is separated from the floor panel, in combination with other features of claim 1. The most closely related art, including Sato et al. (JP 2018158637 A), Altus (US 5052283 A), Felsen (US 6318796 B1), and Held (US 6857955 B1), do not disclose these details. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAURA FREEDMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-2442. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason Shanske can be reached at 571-270-5985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAURA FREEDMAN/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3614
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 10, 2024
Application Filed
May 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 31, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 31, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741619
WORKING MACHINE WITH A FRAME STRUCTURE CONTROLLED EMERGENCY STOP ACTUATOR
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12728934
UTILITY VEHICLE
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728907
STEERING DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722688
STEERING AXLE FOR A STEERABLE VEHICLE, AND INDUSTRIAL TRUCK
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722556
EXPANDABLE FOOD CART
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+0.9%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1218 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month