Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/739,460

INFLATABLE WATERCRAFT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jun 11, 2024
Priority
Jun 12, 2023 — provisional 63/472,531 +1 more
Examiner
DAVIS, RICHARD G
Art Unit
3644
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Team Worldwide Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
674 granted / 838 resolved
+28.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
854
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 838 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This document is responsive to applicant’s Election/Restriction response filed 8/17/2026. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species B in the reply filed on 8/17/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 2 (and 3 by dependency) is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The limitation “and the tubular bodies” is indefinite because claim 1 only introduces “a” tubular body. Since there are two alternative structures in claim 1 that each separately form “a” tubular body, it is not clear if the plural bodies of claim 2 is attempting to claim both embodiments simultaneously even though they are alternatives. In view of the rejections above under 35 USC § 112, the claims referred to in any and all rejections below are rejected as best understood. Any claims that depend upon claims rejected above are also considered rejected via dependency. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 4-7, 9, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bai et al. (US PG Pub 2021/0387700). Regarding claim 1, Bai discloses: An inflatable watercraft comprising: an upper wall (see fig 4 – top surface of inflatable floor 1); a lower wall (see fig , ref 31) connected to the upper wall so as to form a bottom main body; an inner wall (see fig 4 – inner wall of 21) extended longitudinally; an outer wall (see fig 4 – outer wall of 21) also extended longitudinally; wherein the inner wall, the outer wall and the upper wall are connected to form a tubular body around the bottom main body, or the inner wall, the outer wall and the lower wall are connected to form a tubular body around the bottom main body (see fig 4); wherein, when deflated, the tubular body collapses due to gravity so that the outer wall is superposed on the inner wall (as shown in fig 4 – the outer wall would necessarily superpose on the inner wall when deflated). Regarding claim 2, Bai discloses: The inflatable watercraft as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a conduit projected from the lower wall (see figs 2 and 3, ref 7), wherein the bottom main body and the tubular bodies are configured to form a cockpit, and the conduit connects an interior of the cockpit to an exterior of the cockpit (see fig 3). Regarding claim 4, Bai discloses: The inflatable watercraft as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a seat detachably connected to the tubular body (see fig 3). Regarding claim 5, Bai discloses: The inflatable watercraft as claimed in claim 4, wherein the seat comprises a strap and a hook connected to the strap (91), the tubular body comprises a plurality of fastening loops arranged longitudinally (see fig 6), and the hook is configured to selectively catch one of the fastening loops (see fig 4). Regarding claim 6, Bai discloses: An inflatable watercraft comprising: a bottom main body extended longitudinally (1, 31); two tubular bodies extended longitudinally and connected to the bottom main body (21); wherein each of the tubular bodies comprises an inner wall and an outer wall connected to the inner wall (see fig 4); wherein the inner wall is shorter than the outer wall in cross section (the outer wall encompasses the upper portion of the tube and is therefore taller than the shorter inner wall). Regarding claim 7, see the rejection of claim 2. Regarding claim 9, see the rejection of claim 4. Regarding claim 10, see the rejection of claim 5. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 8 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure is found in the Notice of Reference Cited (PTO-892). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICHARD G DAVIS whose telephone number is (571)270-5005. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 8am-6:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Collins can be reached on 571-272-6886. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICHARD G DAVIS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 11, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741727
OUTBOARD MOTOR
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12715590
EJECTION APPARATUS
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12709407
LANDING FACILITY, LANDING METHOD
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12708112
COLLAPSIBLE MOUNTED HUNTING BLIND
1y 3m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12703483
Integrated Propulsion System And Aircraft Using Same
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+18.0%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 838 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month