Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/739,811

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REGULATING DAMPING FORCE OF A VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Jun 11, 2024
Examiner
STAUBACH, CARL C
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The-Enterprise OY
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
411 granted / 565 resolved
+2.7% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
592
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
44.2%
+4.2% vs TC avg
§102
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 565 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-15 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because “software” claim 1 l 6 and claim 12 l 5 is not one of the four statutory categories, see MPEP 2106.03. Dependent claims rejected due to dependency from rejected base claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by Jonson et al US 2022/0234408. In Re 1-12 Jonson teaches: 1. (Currently Amended) A system a sensor arrangement (para 85 fig 7 112-504 “sensor” and or “component”) configured to sense data related to at least one characteristic (para 52) of an upcoming path (para 52 “road”) of the vehicle; a software application (figs 11-18) executable on a user device (fig 17) associated with a user (para 27 “user”), wherein the software application is configured to: receive the sensed data from the sensor arrangement communicably coupled with the software application (figs 10-18); and process the sensed data to predict (“predict” paras 32,79-80,91) at least one damping force value (“target level of damping” 1304 fig 13; 1402 fig 14, paras 30-31) based on the at least one characteristic of the upcoming path of the vehicle; and a control arrangement communicatively coupled with the software application and operatively coupled with at least one actuator (“actuator” paras 31,36), wherein the at least one actuator is coupled with a damping system (title) of the vehicle, and wherein the control arrangement is configured to control the at least one actuator to regulate the damping force based on the predicted at least one damping force value (1306 fig 13; 1406 fig 14, para 54)(at least all figs and paras). 2. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim 1, wherein the sensor arrangement a Global Positioning System (GPS) sensor, a speedometer, a camera (para 52 “camera”), an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensor, a sound level meter (SLM). 3. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim 1, wherein the at least one characteristic characteristic of an upcoming route (para 76) of the vehicle, driving characteristic of the vehicle, speed of the vehicle,1-1 configuration of the damping system, acceleration of the vehicle, orientation of the vehicle; or weather data. 4. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim 2, wherein the camera in the sensor arrangement is configured to capture signals containing information related to the at least one characteristic of the upcoming path transmitted from at least one another vehicle (1302 “another vehicle” fig 13 para 52 camera system of another vehicle). 5. (Currently Amended) The system 6. (Currently Amended) The system a voice input (“voice commands” paras 57,128), a blinking of eyes, a movement of eyes, a movement of a body part of the user. 7. (Currently Amended) The system 8. (Currently Amended) The system 9. (Currently Amended) The system receive previously stored data (para 76 “route previously traveled”) related to the at least one characteristic of the upcoming path from a storage unit (memory 1706 fig 17) communicably coupled to the software application; and process the previously stored data and the sensed data to predict the at least one damping force value (para 76). 10. (Currently Amended) The system 11. (Currently Amended) The system In Re 12-15, the method of claims 12-15 rejected over in re 1,3,6 respectively, as taught by Jonson as described above. Further, the claimed “another vehicle moving in front of the vehicle” is taught by Jonson para 75 another vehicle provides data to subsequent instant vehicle, i.e. the another vehicle precedes the instant vehicle in time and space. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CARL C STAUBACH whose telephone number is (571)272-3748. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Logan Kraft can be reached at 571-270-5065. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CARL C STAUBACH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 11, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595769
VARIABLE VALVE ACTUATION CONTROLS FOR ENGINES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583514
FOUR-WHEEL STEERING CONTROL DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570250
METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN OPTIMUM OR MAXIMUM-PERMISSIBLE SPEED OF A RAIL VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570324
COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING A PLURALITY OF FUNCTIONS FOR A DEVICE, IN PARTICULAR FOR A VEHICLE, BY SEPARATION OF A PLURALITY OF ZONES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12552353
System and Method for Controlling a Vehicle Parking Brake
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+21.3%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 565 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month