Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/739,883

HIGH-STRENGTH AND HIGH-REBOUND GOLF CLUB HEAD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 11, 2024
Examiner
GORDEN, RAEANN
Art Unit
3711
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
1220 granted / 1469 resolved
+13.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-5.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
1510
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.8%
+5.8% vs TC avg
§102
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1469 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nielson et al. (2016/0059093) in view Harbert et al. (2023/0139568). Claim 1, Nielson discloses a golf club head comprising a main body having a crown portion, a sole portion, a toe portion connected with the crown portion and the sole portion, a face plate connecting portion connected with the crown portion, the toe portion, and the sole portion (fig 15A-B). Two first counterweight installation portions (rearward track 12020F; forward channel 12020) provided at the sole portion (fig 46) [0249], a ball striking face plate attached to the face plate connecting portion of the main body (fig 15B). Two first counterweight blocks (weights assemblies 12040; 12040F) installed in the first counterweight installation portions (rearward track 12020F; forward channel 12020) of the main shell (fig 46) [0049]. Each counterweight block (weight assemblies 12040; 12040F) is attached using a screw (set screw) passing through a first elongated fixing hole of one of the first counterweight blocks (weight assemblies) [0249, 0219]. Nielson discloses the weights or counterweight blocks are secured in place by tightening the set screw which causes the screw to compress against the bottom of the channel. Nielson does not disclose threaded screw holes in the main shell or body to receive the screw. Harbert teaches attachments to a sole of a club head using a screw that is secured through a screw hole in the main body (fig 9B). One of ordinary skill in the art would have modified the type of screw connection to optimize strength and durability. Claim 2, Nielson discloses the first counterweight installation portions (rearward track 12020F; forward channel 12020) of the main shell each have two lateral sides; the first counterweight blocks (weights assemblies 12040; 12040F) each have two lateral sides corresponding to the two lateral sides of the first counterweight installation portions of the main shell (fig 46). Claim 3, Nielson discloses one of the first counterweight blocks (weights assemblies 12040; 12040F) is movable along a first moving line, and the other of the first counterweight blocks is movable along a second moving line intersected with the first moving line (fig 46) [0249]. Claim 4, Nielson does not disclose the screw through the main body as shown above. Harbert teaches the screw through the main body (see above) in addition to an inner cylinder portion penetrated by the screw hole (fig 9B area surrounding screw). Claim 7, Nielson does not disclose a groove. Harbert teaches the main shell has a groove provided at the sole portion and located between the channel and the face plate connecting portion (114, fig 3). One of ordinary skill in the art would have included a groove or sole slot to increase the face flex when hitting the golf ball. Claim 8, Nielson discloses the main shell or body may be made from titanium alloy, which is identical to applicant’s material (instant spec page 4). The specific gravity will fall within applicant’s range from 1.7-4.7 [0126]. Claim 9, Nielson discloses the face may be made from steel alloy, which is identical to applicant’s material (instant spec page 4). The specific gravity will fall within applicant’s range from 7-18. Claim 10, Nielson discloses the specific gravity of the ball striking face plate is more than 1.5 times that of the main shell (same as applicant’s materials). One of ordinary skill in the art would have modified the type of screw connection to optimize strength and durability. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAEANN GORDEN whose telephone number is (571)272-4409. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eugene Kim can be reached at 571-272-4463. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAEANN GORDEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3711 January 22, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599819
GOLF CLUB HEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594464
GOLF BALLS HAVING AT LEAST ONE RADAR DETECTABLE MARK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594465
GOLF BALLS HAVING INCREASED IMPACT DURABILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582876
GOLF BALL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576314
GOLF CLUB HEAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (-5.0%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1469 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month