Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/740,604

TRANSMISSION DETERMINATION METHOD AND DEVICE, BASE STATION, TERMINAL, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jun 12, 2024
Examiner
BLANTON, JOHN D
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
ZTE CORPORATION
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
784 granted / 1014 resolved
+19.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1062
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1014 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/17/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. On page 5-6 of the Applicant’s Response, Applicant: “The claimed technical limitation a) "the determined paging occasion refers to a paging PDCCH occasion that is not in conflict with an uplink resource configured in the semi-static frame structure configuration information" focuses on active exclusion of conflicting uplink resources when identifying valid paging occasions, which is fundamentally distinct from the technical solution disclosed in Koskela's paragraph [0034] cited by the Examiner.“. Examiner respectfully disagrees with Applicant’s argument. Koskela expressly discloses a UE receiving semi-static UL/DL slot configuration and a bitmap that indicate slots used for monitoring a paging occasion (p29-31). The indicated slots for paging occasions are PDCCH monitoring occasions specific to the UE and the UE’s UL-DL pattern (p6). The UE uses the bitmap and semi-static UL-DL pattern to determine which DL slots to monitor for paging occasions which avoids monitoring any of the UL slots (p34). This avoids any conflicts with the configured UL resources on a slot basis. Koskela discloses the slot level bitmapping of paging occasions because the UL-DL patterns change and the numerology can be different. This solves the problem of ensuring only downlink and flexible slots are monitored by the UE and UL slots are avoided which lead to discrepancies and wasted power and resources (p27). In view of the above discussions the rejection of claims 1-4 and 7-8 still stands. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 and 7-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Koskela et al. (US 2019/0349885) (“Koskela”). For claims 1, 7, and 8; Koskela discloses: acquiring semi-static frame structure configuration information (paragraph 29-31: the network may use a configured TDD configuration (TDD-UL-DL-ConfigCommon—1&2 concatenated) to get a complete TDD configuration); acquiring synchronization signal block (SSB) configuration information (paragraph 62-63: the UE is configured via MIB (‘pdcch-ConfigSIB1’) with monitoring pattern for Type0-PDCCH, scheduling the SIB1); acquiring paging physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) configuration information (paragraph 47-50: physical downlink control channel configuration may include the information indicating the start of one or more paging occasions…The information may include a bitmap indicating the start of the one or more paging occasions in at least a portion of a subframe); and determining paging occasion (paragraph 63: For example for SS/PBCH and CORESET monitoring pattern 1 where monitoring occasion occurs every 20 ms, the UE is given an offset (O) from the start of the radio frame (where occasions occur), with a shift (M) placing the monitoring occasion corresponding each SSB in time, together with number of possible monitoring occasions per slot. Based on the detected SSB index, information provided by MIB the UE can determine the monitoring occasion (search space) corresponding to each SSB index. FIG. 8 illustrates one realization of search space locations (e.g., paging occasions)); the determined paging occasion refers to a paging PDCCH occasion that is not in conflict with an uplink resource configured in the semi-static frame structure configuration information (paragraph 34: the network may signal to the UE the Nth possible slot(s) being used for paging occasions in the paging frame. To illustrate, the network, such as a base station, may signal to a UE the 1st and 3rd possible slots being used for paging. When this is the case, the UE knows the TDD UL/DL pattern and sees that in the corresponding paging frame to treat the 3rd slot (which can be a DL a lot or bi-directional slot, X) as paging slot, and then the subsequent 10.sup.th slot and so forth as a paging occasion). For claim 2, Koskela discloses: wherein the semi-static frame structure configuration information comprises a frame structure configured by high-layer signaling tdd-UL-DL-ConfigCommon and/or tdd-UL-DL-ConfigDedicated (paragraph 29-31: the network may use a configured TDD configuration (TDD-UL-DL-ConfigCommon—1&2 concatenated) to get a complete TDD configuration). For claim 3, Koskela discloses: wherein the SSB configuration information is used to configure actually transmitted SSB (paragraph 63: For example for SS/PBCH and CORESET monitoring pattern 1 where monitoring occasion occurs every 20 ms, the UE is given an offset (O) from the start of the radio frame (where occasions occur), with a shift (M) placing the monitoring occasion corresponding each SSB in time, together with number of possible monitoring occasions per slot. Based on the detected SSB index, information provided by MIB the UE can determine the monitoring occasion (search space) corresponding to each SSB index. FIG. 8 illustrates one realization of search space locations (e.g., paging occasions)). For claim 4, Koskela discloses: wherein the paging PDCCH information comprise paging PDCCH search space configuration (paragraph 19: the physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) configuration may provide the UE with the search space configuration including the monitoring occasions within a paging occasion). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Agiwal et al. (US 2017/0367069); Agiwal discloses to minimize UE's power consumption is as follows: In this embodiment, based on the configured DRX cycle, a UE determines the start of paging frame or paging occasion or paging burst in which paging is transmitted for the UE. A UE wakes up “N” broadcast periods before the start of paging frame or paging occasion or paging burst (610). The broadcast period (620) is the interval over which BS/eNB/TRP completes one full TX beam sweeping for synchronization signals (such as PSS/SSS/ESS) and broadcast channel (PBCH) transmission. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN D BLANTON whose telephone number is (571)270-3933. The examiner can normally be reached 7am-6pm EST, Mon-Thu. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at 571-272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN D BLANTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 12, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 17, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587929
METHOD AND APPARATUS SUPPORTING RANDOM ACCESS TRANSMISSIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574416
MONITORING OVERLAY NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12574943
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING PHYSICAL DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL AND DEVICE FOR SAME IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563533
RESOURCE ALLOCATION METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556337
BANDWIDTH PART MAPPING FOR CONTROL AND DATA CHANNELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+8.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1014 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month